Matty and Turk's Compost Thread

[Matthew Le God]

1 minute ago, Turkish said:

why did you edit your post removing the word "joke" 1 minute after i posted?

Come on MLG just admit it, you know what you did, you realised you'd get pelters for it so edited it hoping no one would notice, sadly for you they did.

Anyway, having beaten you once again i'll let the good folk of saintsweb carry on with the discussion and i'll see you once this latest lot of wounds have healed from another mauling. 

In what context do you think the word joke was used? Because time after time, you have shown yourself to not understand context.

Edited May 8 by Matthew Le God

[Turkish]

Just now, Matthew Le God said:

So are you saying I won 2007 to 2010, or was that a draw? 🤔😉

Im not going to count when you sulked off for a while as there was no one to beat. 

[Matthew Le God]

Just now, Turkish said:

Im not going to count when you sulked off for a while as there was no one to beat. 

It wasn't sulking and it was only 1 year, not 3. So what about the other 2 years? Did I win them, a draw or is it just you being bad at maths (again)?

[Badger]

Have noticed that the MLG YouTube clip is from an account named Chocolate tampon, and last night Turkish posted one from  a channel operating under the name of spasticballs.

Not your alter egos by chance are they ?

All in all I think we do rather well in toning down the user names on here.

[egg]

1 hour ago, Matthew Le God said:

Bullshit! Stop lying.

You're a repeat offender mate. Poor form. 

[Sarnia Cherie]

13 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

 

Did you watch the video or just read the title?

The video has nothing to do with him being disgraced. That episode is from 2002, 11 years before he was arrested.

I did watch the video for what it was worth. In 2002 we had no idea there was a dark side to Rolf Harris but we do now.  I think you could have found many examples of 'Bouncing Back' without any mention of a convicted paedophile which most people would find insulting.

[skintsaint]

18 minutes ago, Sarnia Cherie said:

I think you could have found many examples of 'Bouncing Back' without any mention of a convicted paedophile which most people would find insulting.

Quite simple really to have done so.

 

[Holmes_and_Watson]

12 hours ago, egg said:

You're a repeat offender mate. Poor form. 

I know MLG has a lot of previous form for amending his posts, after responses and reaction have already been given. 

But disappointing that this is only a couple of weeks after the last time. This, and the pretence that he hadn't, shows that he's clearly incapable of learning anything. It's one thing to disagree with someone on a forum. But something else, if they are just dishonest.

[Sarnia Cherie]

1 hour ago, skintsaint said:

Quite simple really to have done so.

 

Exactly this. Gets the message across.

[Matthew Le God]

1 hour ago, miserableoldgit said:

You forgot to add "Strawman fallacy".....this has to be included in all posts connected with MLG....

Clearly, as people keep using them! 😉

[beatlesaint]

1 hour ago, Matthew Le God said:

I haven't said it is.

No offence mate but can’t you just bugger off for a year or two, you’ve got history with going away so read the room fella 👍

[Miltonaggro]

3 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said:

He'd argue if locked in a shipping container, on his own, in the middle of the North sea.

Is there a go fund me page? 

[Matthew Le God]

53 minutes ago, beatlesaint said:

No offence mate but can’t you just bugger off for a year or two, you’ve got history with going away so read the room fella 👍

Put me on your "ignore list" in the forum settings and you won't see my posts.

Edited May 11 by Matthew Le God

[Weston Super Saint]

49 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

Put me on your "ignore list" in the forum settings and you won't see my posts.

This is not true.

Another MLG fail.

[beatlesaint]

21 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

This is not true.

Another MLG fail.

Yeah exactly, tried it last time he was here !

[trousers]

1 hour ago, Matthew Le God said:

Put me on your "ignore list"

I know this is your go-to stock response, but (genuine question again)... Why do you seemingly appear to be happy with being annoying in the first place?

If people were to accuse me of being annoying, my natural instinct would be to engage in some self-reflection as I would see being perceived as annoying as a bad character trait rather than seeing it as some kind of badge-of-honour, as you seem to do. 

The "just ignore me" mantra is somewhat missing the point, unless you genuinely get a buzz out of being annoying...?

Excuse my amateur psychology, but I'm genuinely interested as to why it wouldn't bother someone if they're continually seen as annoying and not endeavour to be less annoying.... 

Edited May 11 by trousers

[Holmes_and_Watson]

4 minutes ago, goodymatt said:

Impressive to better last seasons point tally with a -£76m spend which included losing GK and both main CBs. The entire spine of the team sold in January actually.

 

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

They sold their best players last summer and in January. So to do better without them is a good thing.

Scooped again MLG. Not your day. 🙂

[trousers]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

They sold their best players last summer and in January. So to do better without them is a good thing.

Careful, you'll have @Holmes_and_Watson pointing out someone else already told me that 5 minutes before you did, if you're not careful...

[trousers]

Just now, Holmes_and_Watson said:

 

Scooped again MLG. Not your day. 🙂

Ha! Beat me to it... Scooped even, you might say....

[Weston Super Saint]

1 minute ago, trousers said:

Careful, you'll have @Holmes_and_Watson pointing out someone else already told me that 5 minutes before you did, if you're not careful...

Oopppps, scooped again

[Holmes_and_Watson]

Just now, trousers said:

Careful, you'll have @Holmes_and_Watson pointing out someone else already told me that 5 minutes before you did, if you're not careful...

Too late
😀

[trousers]

1 minute ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Oopppps, scooped again

I already said I was scooped before you told me I was scooped.... You sir, have also been scooped! 

Edited May 24 by trousers

[Holmes_and_Watson]

Just now, Weston Super Saint said:

Oopppps, scooped again

Gah! Now Weston is Scoop King! 🙂

[trousers]

Just now, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Gah! Now Weston is Scoop King! 🙂

I just told him that FFS!!!

[Matthew Le God]

2 minutes ago, trousers said:

Careful, you'll have @Holmes_and_Watson pointing out someone else already told me that 5 minutes before you did, if you're not careful...

 

2 minutes ago, trousers said:

Ha! Beat me to it... Scooped even, you might say....

The question was to me, not him. So I replied to a question to me.

[Holmes_and_Watson]

Just now, trousers said:

I already said I was scooped before you told me I was scooped.... You sit, have also been scooped! 

I have been called many things, but being called a "sit" is a low shot. I mean, you couldn't even be bothered to put all the letters in. That hurts. 🙂

[trousers]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

 

The question was to me, not him. So I replied to a question to me.

What question?

[Holmes_and_Watson]

1 minute ago, trousers said:

I just told him that FFS!!!

Gah! More scoops than a successful ice cream parlour!

[Matthew Le God]

12 minutes ago, trousers said:

What question?

You seemingly wanting to know the context of how being 1 point better off than the previous season is accomplishing something great.

[Lord Duckhunter]

Surely it’s good, rather than great? 

[The Kraken]

29 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

 

The question was to me, not him. So I replied to a question to me.

Trousers didn’t ask a question.

[Matthew Le God]

4 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

Trousers didn’t ask a question.

He seemingly wanted to know the context of how being 1 point better off than the previous season is accomplishing something great. 

[The Kraken]

Just now, Matthew Le God said:

He seemingly wanted to know the context of how being 1 point better off than the previous season is accomplishing something great. 

You assumed that and volunteered the information. He wasn’t asking a question.

[Matthew Le God]

9 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

You assumed that and volunteered the information. He wasn’t asking a question.

The way he worded it while it's not a direct question like “Is that really a great accomplishment?”, it functions as one by implying doubt.

 

[trousers]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

The way he worded it while it's not a direct question like “Is that really a great accomplishment?”, it functions as one by implying doubt.

 

Please promise me you'll never stop making me chuckle MLG

[Holmes_and_Watson]

While @Matthew Le God is here thinking on trousers (no, not Spors'), any chance of you replying to this...

On 11/05/2025 at 19:45, trousers said:

I know this is your go-to stock response, but (genuine question again)... Why do you seemingly appear to be happy with being annoying in the first place?

If people were to accuse me of being annoying, my natural instinct would be to engage in some self-reflection as I would see being perceived as annoying as a bad character trait rather than seeing it as some kind of badge-of-honour, as you seem to do. 

The "just ignore me" mantra is somewhat missing the point, unless you genuinely get a buzz out of being annoying...?

Excuse my amateur psychology, but I'm genuinely interested as to why it wouldn't bother someone if they're continually seen as annoying and not endeavour to be less annoying.... 

It was posted shortly after you were defending posting a video concerning a convicted paedophile, and a bit after your meltdown asking several people to put you on ignore, and getting caught editing posts to change their context.

[Matthew Le God]

13 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

While @Matthew Le God is here thinking on trousers (no, not Spors'), any chance of you replying to this...

It was posted shortly after you were defending posting a video concerning a convicted paedophile, and a bit after your meltdown asking several people to put you on ignore, and getting caught editing posts to change their context.

1) The joke was about Alan Partridge bouncing back in 2002!

2) I didn't change the context in any edited post. I edit posts to correct spelling mistakes or add something to them for further clarification. I don't do it to fundamentally change the purpose of them. You continue to bullshit about this.

3) Suggesting people use the ignore forum function is not a meltdown. It is a suggestion to solve something they have an issue with.

Edited May 24 by Matthew Le God

[Matthew Le God]

22 minutes ago, trousers said:

Please promise me you'll never stop making me chuckle MLG

 

 

[The Kraken]

4) you didn’t answer the question.

[The Kraken]

Which is kind of funny, as you answered a non-question from trousers quite willingly.

[Matthew Le God]

3 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

Which is kind of funny, as you answered a non-question from trousers quite willingly.

It wasn't a non question. It functions as one by implying doubt. I think we need some Saints forum English lessons.

 

 

[The Kraken]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

It wasn't a non question. It functions as one by implying doubt. I think we need some Saints forum English lessons.

 

 

Trousers’ made a statement that you assumed was a question. It’s a bit like me saying “unless I’m missing some context, MLG’s posting history makes him seem like a needlessly argumentative prat”. I’m not asking a question, I’m making a statement. 

GCSE ‘A’ grade at English language and English literature thank you very much 😎

[The Kraken]

And you still haven’t answered the actual question.

[trousers]

4 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

And you still haven’t answered the actual question.

What question...?

[Matthew Le God]

15 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

GCSE ‘A’ grade at English language and English literature thank you very much 😎

Mix up at the exam board.

[The Kraken]

Another response but still no answer to the actual question.

[Matthew Le God]

13 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

And you still haven’t answered the actual question.

Here is your answer @trousers

I'm not bothered by people on this forum finding me annoying. Even those on here that I find annoying. It has no impact on my life outside this forum.

[Turkish]

1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

Mix up at the exam board.

You’re getting ironed out more than a linen shirt these day MLG, sad to see a once great poster floundering around like a punch drunk boxer a shadow of your former self. You used to at least provide some opposition but these days it’s like knocking away a disabled fly with a giant electric swatter

[Holmes_and_Watson]

29 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

1) The joke was about Alan Partridge bouncing back in 2002!

2) I didn't change the context in any edited post. I edit posts to correct spelling mistakes or add something to them for further clarification. I don't do it to fundamentally change the purpose of them. You continue to bullshit about this.

3) Suggesting people use the ignore forum function is not a meltdown. It is a suggestion to solve something they have an issue with.

1) As pointed out by several, there were far better ways to have communicated the same thing. But you went with a class defense of it.

2) You've been caught at this so often, your defence of it is infantile. Twice within the space of a few weeks recently.

3) No one else has issues, except yourself. Yet you were the one to give a list of several names. Perhaps you could put allmof them on ignore? Oh, and a few posters pretty much asked to be added, the following week, to be spared from your thread derailments.

It's a bit pathetic not to take the views of a number of people into account, about how you post. Oddly, you are the first to go into huffs and hiding when challenged. It clearly affects you here. Just not enough for you to avoid endlessly repeating your behaviour.

[Holmes_and_Watson]

3 minutes ago, Turkish said:

You’re getting ironed out more than a linen shirt these day MLG, sad to see a once great poster floundering around like a punch drunk boxer a shadow of your former self. You used to at least provide some opposition but these days it’s like knocking away a disabled fly with a giant electric swatter

I recently saw some posts from 2012, and the word "bellend" was regularly used in relation to MLG. And those posts referred to earlier events. So, not sure about that one.

I agree that more and more flies over his head, and the holes he digs are more desperate. His carer has reduced him to having the two buttons, "bullshit" and "strawman" to add to posts too.