swedish dave Posted Wednesday at 13:13 Posted Wednesday at 13:13 20 hours ago, Tommy Mulgrew said: I’m guessing - Welcome back, Dave; it’s been a while since I used to read your strangely-formatted posts on this forum. Thanks for the greeting Tommy. Firstly, I was away on a long, pensioners summer holiday and decided to ignore the site - until all the fan aggression disappeared after that awful relegation. As a fan for over 60 years, I have experienced relegations before but I never reacted in the manner that some apparently did by posting incessant abuse day after day. Later on I had major problems with my e-mail account, and got lost and was forced to begin again with a new ID, leaving my previous 11, 000+ posts disappearing into the dusts of time. 6
swedish dave Posted Wednesday at 13:21 Posted Wednesday at 13:21 21 hours ago, Crab Lungs said: I read this like I would a poem 😭 Oh....was that a compliment, or a criticism? I do write in a lot in differing styles, (and even had some poetry published - back in the day). Nowadays my hobby is writing film scripts that may never see the light of day, and responding to postings on football sites that are written in understandable English. 1
Crab Lungs Posted Wednesday at 14:21 Posted Wednesday at 14:21 (edited) 1 hour ago, swedish dave said: Oh....was that a compliment, or a criticism? I do write in a lot in differing styles, (and even had some poetry published - back in the day). Nowadays my hobby is writing film scripts that may never see the light of day, and responding to postings on football sites that are written in understandable English. A backhanded compliment, I got halfway through and realised it wasn’t a poem 😂 don’t stop - it’s unique Edited Wednesday at 14:21 by Crab Lungs 2
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Wednesday at 23:09 Posted Wednesday at 23:09 8 hours ago, Crab Lungs said: A backhanded compliment, I got halfway through and realised it wasn’t a poem 😂 don’t stop - it’s unique I've listened to enough radio 4, to be able to read Dave's posts as poetry. Finishing with things like "dusts of time" adds real gravitas to them. More please! 2
swedish dave Posted Thursday at 16:39 Posted Thursday at 16:39 (edited) 17 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: I've listened to enough radio 4, to be able to read Dave's posts as poetry. Finishing with things like "dusts of time" adds real gravitas to them. More please! Thank you H&W , (that's 3 of you who have commented), although there used to be "someone" on here who periodically criticised me, but the only thing I can recall was that he rarely used a Spell Checker. I don't go out of my way to be different, but I was the kid who read a lot of books when young, (and then teachers wanted me to read my scrawling aloud to the class), which frequently made me unpopular with those ...who didn't. The tone of some postings tends to brings out the cynic in me, but as I am in a generation too old to care, the one thing I have learned ...is to be pragmatic. Changing managers and even owners, and surviving bankruptcies is just par for the course for me after 66+ years as a fan, although to be fair there are times - when provoked - that quite frankly - I just don't give a da*n. Edited Thursday at 16:40 by swedish dave 2
Badger Posted Thursday at 19:16 Posted Thursday at 19:16 On 14/01/2026 at 13:13, swedish dave said: Thanks for the greeting Tommy. Firstly, I was away on a long, pensioners summer holiday and decided to ignore the site - until all the fan aggression disappeared after that awful relegation. As a fan for over 60 years, I have experienced relegations before but I never reacted in the manner that some apparently did by posting incessant abuse day after day. Later on I had major problems with my e-mail account, and got lost and was forced to begin again with a new ID, leaving my previous 11, 000+ posts disappearing into the dusts of time. Welcome back. 4
Fabrice29 Posted Thursday at 19:39 Posted Thursday at 19:39 (edited) Funny for this thread to be bumped over some good performances in the league below us when there’s a young lad invigorating Wolves season in the one above who was in our U18’s for a period 2 years ago. Edited Thursday at 19:41 by Fabrice29
Tommy Mulgrew Posted Thursday at 20:34 Posted Thursday at 20:34 51 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said: a young lad … who was in our U18’s for a period 2 years ago Did his elder brother score for Senegal against Egypt yesterday? 🤓
The Kraken Posted Thursday at 21:15 Posted Thursday at 21:15 1 hour ago, Fabrice29 said: Funny for this thread to be bumped over some good performances in the league below us when there’s a young lad invigorating Wolves season in the one above who was in our U18’s for a period 2 years ago. Yes, it’s definitely funny that a thread started 4 years ago about a 16 year old would be bumped to update on his progress. Very funny indeed. 1
Ted Bates Statue Posted Thursday at 21:38 Posted Thursday at 21:38 On 14/01/2026 at 13:13, swedish dave said: Thanks for the greeting Tommy. Firstly, I was away on a long, pensioners summer holiday and decided to ignore the site - until all the fan aggression disappeared after that awful relegation. As a fan for over 60 years, I have experienced relegations before but I never reacted in the manner that some apparently did by posting incessant abuse day after day. Later on I had major problems with my e-mail account, and got lost and was forced to begin again with a new ID, leaving my previous 11, 000+ posts disappearing into the dusts of time. 1
saintant Posted Thursday at 21:55 Posted Thursday at 21:55 2 hours ago, Fabrice29 said: Funny for this thread to be bumped over some good performances in the league below us when there’s a young lad invigorating Wolves season in the one above who was in our U18’s for a period 2 years ago. Presume you refer to Mateus Mane. I'm not sure of his history but records show he played one game for our U18s in 23/24. Strange because there is no transfer history for him other than he went from Rochdale to Wolves.
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Thursday at 22:06 Posted Thursday at 22:06 8 minutes ago, saintant said: Presume you refer to Mateus Mane. I'm not sure of his history but records show he played one game for our U18s in 23/24. Strange because there is no transfer history for him other than he went from Rochdale to Wolves. According to https://alwayswolves.co.uk/everything-you-need-to-know-about-wolves-mateus-mane/ "The promise was clear to see and, despite a trial with Southampton, he opted to sign for Wolves in the summer of that year."
saintant Posted Thursday at 22:10 Posted Thursday at 22:10 1 minute ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: According to https://alwayswolves.co.uk/everything-you-need-to-know-about-wolves-mateus-mane/ "The promise was clear to see and, despite a trial with Southampton, he opted to sign for Wolves in the summer of that year." Ah, so his appearance for us was as a trialist and he opted to join Wolves. Presume for some reason he never met Ankersen or he'd have certainly joined us 🙂 1 2
saintant Posted Thursday at 22:12 Posted Thursday at 22:12 2 hours ago, Fabrice29 said: Funny for this thread to be bumped over some good performances in the league below us when there’s a young lad invigorating Wolves season in the one above who was in our U18’s for a period 2 years ago. Seems it was one game as a trialist and he decided to join Wolves.
Badger Posted Thursday at 22:19 Posted Thursday at 22:19 3 minutes ago, saintant said: Seems it was one game as a trialist and he decided to join Wolves. Or it was one game, we’d seen enough and didn’t pursue it. This seems a non-story to me. Plenty of players have passed through our trials and either chosen elsewhere (Gascoigne for example) or been overlooked (Kevin Phillips for example). Others have slipped the net elsewhere and ended up at Saints. Big deal. What was Fabrice’s point ? 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Thursday at 22:25 Posted Thursday at 22:25 4 minutes ago, Badger said: Or it was one game, we’d seen enough and didn’t pursue it. This seems a non-story to me. Plenty of players have passed through our trials and either chosen elsewhere (Gascoigne for example) or been overlooked (Kevin Phillips for example). Others have slipped the net elsewhere and ended up at Saints. Big deal. What was Fabrice’s point ? About to make a connection between the Arias playing for Wolves and our Federico Arias from around 20 years ago?
saintant Posted Thursday at 22:42 Posted Thursday at 22:42 20 minutes ago, Badger said: Or it was one game, we’d seen enough and didn’t pursue it. This seems a non-story to me. Plenty of players have passed through our trials and either chosen elsewhere (Gascoigne for example) or been overlooked (Kevin Phillips for example). Others have slipped the net elsewhere and ended up at Saints. Big deal. What was Fabrice’s point ? Not sure. He seems to suggest that Mateus Mane was a member of our U18 squad but that appears not to be the case. 1
Fabrice29 Posted Thursday at 22:57 Posted Thursday at 22:57 34 minutes ago, Badger said: Or it was one game, we’d seen enough and didn’t pursue it. This seems a non-story to me. Plenty of players have passed through our trials and either chosen elsewhere (Gascoigne for example) or been overlooked (Kevin Phillips for example). Others have slipped the net elsewhere and ended up at Saints. Big deal. What was Fabrice’s point ? I thought this place would have a bigger hissy fit over Mane than Ballard, that’s all. He’d have been much more useful this season. Anyway, as you say, non story and no big deal. Far too sensible approach.
Fabrice29 Posted Thursday at 22:58 Posted Thursday at 22:58 15 minutes ago, saintant said: Not sure. He seems to suggest that Mateus Mane was a member of our U18 squad but that appears not to be the case. Well except for the time he played and trained for them. But yeh not the case 😂 2
swedish dave Posted yesterday at 14:06 Posted yesterday at 14:06 15 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: According to https://alwayswolves.co.uk/everything-you-need-to-know-about-wolves-mateus-mane/ "The promise was clear to see and, despite a trial with Southampton, he opted to sign for Wolves in the summer of that year." Only bought himself a little time. He rejected us (as a relegated Prem. side) but will likely be playing Championship football next season if he stays with Wolves. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted yesterday at 15:56 Posted yesterday at 15:56 (edited) 17 hours ago, Badger said: Or it was one game, we’d seen enough and didn’t pursue it. This seems a non-story to me. Plenty of players have passed through our trials and either chosen elsewhere (Gascoigne for example) or been overlooked (Kevin Phillips for example). Others have slipped the net elsewhere and ended up at Saints. Big deal. What was Fabrice’s point ? Newcastle put Shearer in goal when looking at him from the reports for Wallsend Boys. Jack Hixton, Lawrie’s man in the North East knew better. Kevin Phillips was a full back in our youth team and by his own admission a very middling one. Took an injury crisis at Watford to become an emergency forward. Edited yesterday at 15:56 by Gloucester Saint
washsaint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago BY the week, looking more and mroe of a ridculous decision by the wankers in charge of our club. Utterly clueless. 3
Tommy Mulgrew Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) Scored another hat-trick today; six shots, four on target, three goals, won four free kicks and won both attempted tackles. Yet he’s not good enough for the mighty Saints. Edited 3 hours ago by Tommy Mulgrew 84 goals and 20 assists in 152 games, according to transfermarkt 7
macca155 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Another hatrick for Ballard, I could weep. What utter madness to sell him. 4
Mboto Gorge Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, Tommy Mulgrew said: Scored another hat-trick today; six shots, four on target, three goals, won four free kicks and won both attempted tackles. Yet he’s not good enough for the mighty Saints. Hang on, are you telling me that our owners have made a bad decision? Not sure that’s possible, they’re usually bang on with everything they do Edited 5 hours ago by Mboto Gorge 3
Football Special Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1Ps1TW6pcw/ Edited 5 hours ago by Football Special
Nordic Saint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 22 minutes ago, macca155 said: Another hatrick for Ballard, I could weep. What utter madness to sell him. At least, according to Orient fans, we get a cut of the fee when he's sold to a bigger club. League One Top Scorers - BBC Sport
EBS1980 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I think it was the right call to sell him, he had a few loans an hadn’t done anything and wasn’t at the level we needed. Was no point keeping in the b team as was too good for that level. Whether he can do it higher than L1 we don’t know but hopefully we have a sell on so we get more cash when he moves on in the summer lol 1
Lighthouse Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, EBS1980 said: I think it was the right call to sell him, he had a few loans an hadn’t done anything and wasn’t at the level we needed. Was no point keeping in the b team as was too good for that level. Whether he can do it higher than L1 we don’t know but hopefully we have a sell on so we get more cash when he moves on in the summer lol I agree. There's a lot of hindsight going on here recently for a player who's still never done anything at Championship level. Last year's L1 golden boot went to Charlie Kelman. This season he has as many non-penalty goals as Ross Stewart, so making the step up is hardly guaranteed. Ultimately, Dom needed a fresh start at a lower level. He got it and he's thriving, so fair play to him. If, in summer, we'd signed a man who last season scored three goals in League 1, to spearhead our promotion push to the PL, people on this board would be apoplectic. 4
lambtiss Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: I agree. There's a lot of hindsight going on here recently for a player who's still never done anything at Championship level. Last year's L1 golden boot went to Charlie Kelman. This season he has as many non-penalty goals as Ross Stewart, so making the step up is hardly guaranteed. Ultimately, Dom needed a fresh start at a lower level. He got it and he's thriving, so fair play to him. If, in summer, we'd signed a man who last season scored three goals in League 1, to spearhead our promotion push to the PL, people on this board would be apoplectic. Wrong to brand it as all hindsight. At the time, most Saints fans I knew were sad to see him go and were disappointed to see potential like Ballard’s squandered for less then £1m at a time when we were clearly short of attacking options and dropping a division to the Championship. To then see us spunk 7-10 times the fee we received for one of our own for on an unknown from the German 2nd tier just rubs salt into the wound, particularly when he turned out to be useless. it’s just another example of SRs transfer incompetency. 4
washsaint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, lambtiss said: Wrong to brand it as all hindsight. At the time, most Saints fans I knew were sad to see him go and were disappointed to see potential like Ballard’s squandered for less then £1m at a time when we were clearly short of attacking options and dropping a division to the Championship. To then see us spunk 7-10 times the fee we received for one of our own for on an unknown from the German 2nd tier just rubs salt into the wound, particularly when he turned out to be useless. it’s just another example of SRs transfer incompetency. Amen to this - he was a Saint through and through and it's clear he's got an eye for goal. I couldn't believe he was sold without being given a chance whereas that donkey DOwns was signed and looks like he's never played the game before. Look at how well it's worked out not binning off Cam Bragg (who you could argue has been our best midfielder this season) who also struggled on loan at L1 last season. 2
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Another sliding doors moment for SR, that they are always on the wrong side of. Ballard had been injured, and he was probably a season back on pushing through. We went with the more proven Archer. It's not so much bringing in Downs, as Ballard being behind top scorer AA and 15 million Archer. We could, and possibly should, have extended his contract and loaned him out for the season. Assuming he was willing to do that. Then moved Archer on, if possible.
Lighthouse Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 15 minutes ago, lambtiss said: Wrong to brand it as all hindsight. At the time, most Saints fans I knew were sad to see him go and were disappointed to see potential like Ballard’s squandered for less then £1m at a time when we were clearly short of attacking options and dropping a division to the Championship. To then see us spunk 7-10 times the fee we received for one of our own for on an unknown from the German 2nd tier just rubs salt into the wound, particularly when he turned out to be useless. it’s just another example of SRs transfer incompetency. I will say with a reasonable degree of certainty that if Ballard was still here he would not be getting into the team ahead of Armstrong and that if he did he wouldn't have come close to his scoring record so far. People are rather weirdly pretending that L1 and the Championship are the same level. They aren't.
Junkyard Dog Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: I will say with a reasonable degree of certainty that if Ballard was still here he would not be getting into the team ahead of Armstrong and that if he did he wouldn't have come close to his scoring record so far. People are rather weirdly pretending that L1 and the Championship are the same level. They aren't. I would of liked if he was given a chance also he would have been good cover when needed 1
lambtiss Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 13 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: I will say with a reasonable degree of certainty that if Ballard was still here he would not be getting into the team ahead of Armstrong and that if he did he wouldn't have come close to his scoring record so far. People are rather weirdly pretending that L1 and the Championship are the same level. They aren't. Nobody is suggesting that he would get into the team ahead of Armstrong. But he would have been a much better option than Downes off the bench and possibly Archer. 1
bugenhagen Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: I will say with a reasonable degree of certainty that if Ballard was still here he would not be getting into the team ahead of Armstrong and that if he did he wouldn't have come close to his scoring record so far. People are rather weirdly pretending that L1 and the Championship are the same level. They aren't. I think you are right in this. I would have loved for him to stay and been given a chance with us, as I did rate him, but I think this was the best move for his career. He would be shit in our setup. Just look at James Bree. Nobody was too bothered about him going out on loan, he wasn't that good. After playing 20 odd games for Charlton, he looks like a proper player. Watch him come back, and suddenly become as shit as all our other defenders.
Lighthouse Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, lambtiss said: Nobody is suggesting that he would get into the team ahead of Armstrong. But he would have been a much better option than Downes off the bench and possibly Archer. Imagine this press statement from Spors in summer: "We've been looking at two 20 year old players for the last few months. We had the option of signing either another sub-6ft striker for £1m from Blackpool, he's just scored three goals in League 1, or a 6'4" USA international for £7m, who's just scored ten goals in Bundesliga 2. We're going with option A because it's much cheaper." How do you think that goes down?
saintant Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, bugenhagen said: I think you are right in this. I would have loved for him to stay and been given a chance with us, as I did rate him, but I think this was the best move for his career. He would be shit in our setup. Just look at James Bree. Nobody was too bothered about him going out on loan, he wasn't that good. After playing 20 odd games for Charlton, he looks like a proper player. Watch him come back, and suddenly become as shit as all our other defenders. It's a fair point and you have to question the fitness training and coaching at our club. We buy some good players who progressively get worse the longer they are here and we're seeing that at the moment with Azaz, Scienza and Jander. On the flip side the likes of Bree, Adams, Bednarek have all thrived since leaving. It's no coincidence. 2
lambtiss Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, Lighthouse said: Imagine this press statement from Spors in summer: "We've been looking at two 20 year old players for the last few months. We had the option of signing either another sub-6ft striker for £1m from Blackpool, he's just scored three goals in League 1, or a 6'4" USA international for £7m, who's just scored ten goals in Bundesliga 2. We're going with option A because it's much cheaper." How do you think that goes down? Simple, you would sack the press officer who came up with such a ridiculous statement. 1
bugenhagen Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, saintant said: It's a fair point and you have to question the fitness training and coaching at our club. We buy some good players who progressively get worse the longer they are here and we're seeing that at the moment with Azaz, Scienza and Jander. On the flip side the likes of Bree, Adams, Bednarek have all thrived since leaving. It's no coincidence. True. The biggest difference for me in Tondas good period, and the shit we have been served before and after is willingness to run and work hard. Its mostly the same players and tactics, but in that brief spell there was a willingness to run for each other. That opens up spaces, lets us play faster passes etc. Also pionts to the fact we could only do it for about 45 minutes pr game, and certainly not over the Christmas period. When players struggle mentally and are losing a lot, they have not suddenly turned into shit footballers. But the stop running for each other. Just a little less. And that makes a huge difference. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now