Turkish Posted June 9 Posted June 9 8 hours ago, washsaint said: To be fair to Sullivan this is cancel culture at its worst. He's never been charged with any offences and whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? UK society makes me sick - people being 'canceled' left right and center because pearl clutching morons think they are 'holier than thou' and so much better than the plebs. Look at the witch hunt against Saints (and Tonda) for something that is absolutely miniscule in the great scheme of things. This is what happens when you have drips running the country pushing their left wing agenda. People desperately wanting to be see as moral guardians of society. It’s like a disease for which there is no cure. 1 1
sadoldgit Posted June 9 Posted June 9 7 hours ago, Noodles34 said: Yeah, watched it tonight and where’s the evidence? No allegiance to Sullivan in the slightest and certainly not West Ham but police have investigated and came up with nothing. There’s 7 women that say this and that and maybe they are being truthful, but maybe they are not, who really knows? But shit sticks. Not sure how the BBC and The Times think this is worthy of someone’s reputation being trashed. I’m guessing but would assume that having interviewed the women and investigated it more than you or I, they think it worth pursuing. The bloke had a shit reputation as it is. He made his money through the sex trade.
disconnect Posted June 9 Posted June 9 9 hours ago, Noodles34 said: Yeah, watched it tonight and where’s the evidence? No allegiance to Sullivan in the slightest and certainly not West Ham but police have investigated and came up with nothing. There’s 7 women that say this and that and maybe they are being truthful, but maybe they are not, who really knows? But shit sticks. Not sure how the BBC and The Times think this is worthy of someone’s reputation being trashed. Well, the BBC have very recent history of desperately trying to trash someone's reputation for far less...!
Lighthouse Posted June 9 Posted June 9 10 hours ago, washsaint said: To be fair to Sullivan this is cancel culture at its worst. He's never been charged with any offences and whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? UK society makes me sick - people being 'canceled' left right and center because pearl clutching morons think they are 'holier than thou' and so much better than the plebs. Look at the witch hunt against Saints (and Tonda) for something that is absolutely miniscule in the great scheme of things. He hasn't been 'cancelled' he has stepped down after some pretty serious allegations from multiple different sources. It's clearly in everybody's interest for him to step away from running a football club whilst this is investigated. I'm not sure what's, "holier than thou pearl clutching," here either, what he's been accused of is pretty serious. Guilty or not, I'd like to think that 99% of people would never do the things these women are claiming. 5
Anders Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Can't believe these drips pushing their left wing agenda want to cancel someone who ran a publication which sexualised 15/16 year old girls, paid a 16yo for sex when he was in his 40's and allegedly pressured young women into sleeping with him. 2
Forester Posted June 9 Posted June 9 12 minutes ago, Anders said: Can't believe these drips pushing their left wing agenda want to cancel someone who ran a publication which sexualised 15/16 year old girls, paid a 16yo for sex when he was in his 40's and allegedly pressured young women into sleeping with him. You are far too sensible for this place. The meatheads will be after you! 2
suewhistle Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Yes, just your common or garden hard core pornographer/pimp. On the Millwall forum one of the them who used to work on the print confirmed that he handled some real nasty stuff from Sullivan. 1
Turkish Posted June 9 Posted June 9 2 minutes ago, suewhistle said: Yes, just your common or garden hard core pornographer/pimp. On the Millwall forum one of the them who used to work on the print confirmed that he handled some real nasty stuff from Sullivan. Well if a Millwall fan is saying it on a football forum case closed 1
Noodles34 Posted June 9 Posted June 9 2 hours ago, sadoldgit said: I’m guessing but would assume that having interviewed the women and investigated it more than you or I, they think it worth pursuing. The bloke had a shit reputation as it is. He made his money through the sex trade. And what's wrong with that? I accept he may be a complete tool and maybe a nasty one and maybe he's guilty as sin, but sorry, one woman who admitted to having sex with him (after he promised her all the riches etc) said she couldn't remember if she said 'I don't want to do this' loud enough, or even at all. Sort of lost me on that to be honest.
Midfield_General Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Loving all this Saints-related chat, just what the main board is for 1
Oldandtired Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Could only have been worse if he'd stood behind a tree with an iPhone.. 2 1
Toadhall Saint Posted June 9 Posted June 9 52 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: Loving all this Saints-related chat, just what the main board is for Needs to be put in the lounge. I’ll worry about WHU when we play them. 1
Turkish Posted June 9 Posted June 9 59 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: Loving all this Saints-related chat, just what the main board is for Never miss an opportunity to be virtuous pal
Lord Duckhunter Posted June 9 Posted June 9 (edited) Fucking hell, I’m really shocked things like this were going on . Those poor unfortunate birds, all they wanted to do was be glamour models & work for a porn baron, they can’t have suspected for one minute it was such a sleazy trade. Let’s hope the industry has cleaned up its act & have safeguards in place to stop the exploitation & objectification of innocent chicks trying to forge a career in the porn business Edited June 9 by Lord Duckhunter 2
sadoldgit Posted June 9 Posted June 9 (edited) 7 hours ago, Noodles34 said: And what's wrong with that? I accept he may be a complete tool and maybe a nasty one and maybe he's guilty as sin, but sorry, one woman who admitted to having sex with him (after he promised her all the riches etc) said she couldn't remember if she said 'I don't want to do this' loud enough, or even at all. Sort of lost me on that to be honest. There is a lot wrong with him. Go look up Mary Millington if you need more evidence. You don’t find many decent people making fortunes out of pimping and pornography. Edited June 9 by sadoldgit
saintstowin Posted June 9 Posted June 9 Everyone knew he was a dirty little whatever. But just because you go into this industry (as a woman) doesn't mean men should be able to further exploit you. What decade it occured and however long it took someone to come forward - doesn't matter. Even if it is/was commonplace it doesn't make it ok. And it's not left or right wing it's sexual assault and exploitation. And now it's coming out that he was banned by his own club from children's and women's football. That is just shocking and links the club to all this in a way they've desperately tried to avoid so far. I hope that gets fully investigated, but I also hope it doesn't take any legal attention away from him.
Turkish Posted June 9 Posted June 9 1 hour ago, sadoldgit said: There is a lot wrong with him. Go look up Mary Millington if you need more evidence. You don’t find many decent people making fortunes out of pimping and pornography. I expect his done some truly abhorrent things in his time, like squeezing his nipple in the direction of a women when he wants milk in his coffee
Lord Duckhunter Posted June 9 Posted June 9 2 hours ago, sadoldgit said: There is a lot wrong with him. Go look up Mary Millington if you need more evidence. You don’t find many decent people making fortunes out of pimping and pornography. Not only is it not crime of the century, it’s legal. Mary Millington entered that industry of her own free will. She was a Brass from the late 60’s & only hooked up with Sullivan in 1974. To try and claim he somehow corrupted her is a stretch even for a radish like you. He made her one of the most famous chicks of the 70’s. For a bloke who spent hours “researching” Bonnie Blue, you’ve got a strange relationship with the morals of the porn industry. Forget Mary Milligan, Mary Whitehouse is more your bag. 2
Willo of Whiteley Posted June 9 Posted June 9 2 hours ago, Cuddles said: Wow West Ham doing a great job of making us look better 😂 Has Steve Gibson demanded a fine and points deduction yet? 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted June 9 Posted June 9 2 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said: Not only is it not crime of the century, it’s legal. Mary Millington entered that industry of her own free will. She was a Brass from the late 60’s & only hooked up with Sullivan in 1974. To try and claim he somehow corrupted her is a stretch even for a radish like you. He made her one of the most famous chicks of the 70’s. For a bloke who spent hours “researching” Bonnie Blue, you’ve got a strange relationship with the morals of the porn industry. Forget Mary Milligan, Mary Whitehouse is more your bag. But who can forget the lovely Mary Milligan, here starring in a Scandinavian production, posted until the mods ban it?
Mustang Saint Posted June 13 Posted June 13 On 09/06/2026 at 23:22, Willo of Whiteley said: Has Steve Gibson demanded a fine and points deduction yet? No but Ipswich got a penalty
Holmes_and_Watson Posted June 13 Posted June 13 6 hours ago, Mustang Saint said: No but Ipswich got a penalty Updates... There's safeguarding. But no one knows, and Sullivan is seemingly able to go about unmonitored, with no checks. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c862wpn8e4xo Karen Brady, with family connections to what Sullivan and Gold were up to, says she knew about the West Ham ban, but presumed he was innocent. Her amnesia must be a concern for those who know her. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c862wpn8e4xo Calls for a change...including from the daughter of Gold, who also has a shady past, but who wants to be involved. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c932ll05592o On the other hand, you could just push to get shot of the lot of them, and actually enforce your safeguarding.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now