Special K

Steamy ****ing windows!

You aint a man, 'til you had a tan. (on your nob that is, just in case someone accuses me of being racist, like)

Difficult one. I think the second one was very rude in not getting involved. At the very least she sould have tickled your hairy taters or at least offered a bit of token sapphic action with her mate, even if it was restricted to a bit of tit play. I think it is fair to say that it was a legit 3some. And well done you for going through with the second one, especially if she was an odrinary doris. It shows chivalry is far from dead in the modern thoughtful male (bear, or human, type thing).

Exploding wing mirrors is the way forward.

I can think of three good reasons why you shouldn't do that George.

If there is a re-match, your mate need not be worried on the evidence of that. The other fella looked llike he was just happy wearing baggy shorts and a headguard. He reminded me of this.......

Au contraire T. Option B was offered as "Or would you rather P survived and we strove for promotion on our own merits and not neccesarily be succesful (Vote B). Easy choice" Doesn't say we wouldn't be successful at promotion. MLG stylee-backatcha big fella. But taking your point, i still think i would go for B. I know it may go against the grain, but there's something more appealing about seeing them humiliated and belittled as opposed to expunged. Far more banter mileage with the fishy few in that. All imho of course.

Poor thing RIP little one.

B for me. We are good enough to go up on our own accord. This mixed with Pompey playing Winchester City, et al next season would be terrific.

So fella's, all about the same age, then. I guess we can say late 30's / early 40's is the danger zone! Glad things have or are working out for you though.

All 2,000 of them.

Not really my thing. I remember having a burger from a french McDonalds outlet about 5 or 6 years ago, on the drive back from the south of france. It was ok as i remember, but probably because i was hank fookin' marvin. Don't really like the look of their outlets though and wouldn't choose to buy food from there if there were other options.

Of those who have, what age were you when you experienced it? Personally, i don't think i am there yet, but i can sense something may be around the corner!

I prefer to look down on Sun readers. Jasper was right back in the 80's and 90's with his skits on them and from the people i know who "read" the Sun, they are generally of low intelligence with an inability to converse properly, preferring to confine themselves to a limited range of topics; generally related to television programmes, unrealistic future sexual achievements and celebrity gossip. Granted, they talk enthusiastically on these subjects, but then spoil it by liberal use of swearing to (presumably) lengthen a sentence, due to a limited vocabulary. I know it's all very un-PC these days to be condescending, but quite honestly i've given them enough time to better themselves and they have failed. Miserably.

So, did anyone "read" this bull **** yesterday? Was it a revelation to drag yourselves through the insipid banality of a celebrity-obsessed w@nk fest on a Sunday too?

Crap memories of bad performances there in the past. Hope for a lot different tomorrow.

I've had some dealings with them on commercial construction projects over the last 6 years. Pre economic collapse, they were so gung-ho, it was untrue. I saw at first hand the supposed "due diligence" they were obliged to undertake, but it never amounted to more than a cursory glance over someone else's figures. As long as someone said it was ok, then hey, they could take it as ok. Crazy. Then, as it all went breasts-up, the ineptitude of the same cowboys shone through. Previously big-bollocked bulls!tters were replaced by frightened little boys, who couldn't make a decision and referred everything "upstairs". Fortunately, most of them were shown the door during 08 - 09. However, this had the nasty effect of the future of projects being determined by the faceless tools up at HQ. Viable schemes were closed down in a blind panic to declare "toxic" debt and some very good people lost a great deal of money, or worse, their livelihoods. Quite honestly, i've no time for them. And certainly no time for them dishing out bonuses whilst making a thumping great loss. Tossers.

No, the dog is alive and well and living in Monaco.

Upper Shirley Village is a gun free zone.

Is there not a place for a (dare i say it) "softer" belief system where participation in the social side of religous services, as you say, is an equally valid form of religous observation? Strict adherence to a prescribed faith may not suit everyone, and instead of trying to find a faith that does suit the individual, surely the freedom to adopt a more personal faith that is based upon a set of values and tenets is no less genuine, even if its outward manifestation is through, for instance, church gatherings and events. After all we are no longer subject to the fear of imposed beliefs and are free to choose our own direction. If we can find that this suits our choices, then i wouldn't want to see it described as any less authentic than customary religous observations.

Ahhh! So it should be sung in a Black Country accent. Thanks

What does Kum-by-ya (sp?) mean? I remember singing it at school during morning assembly, whilst looking at those hymn books that were covered with brightly-covered vinyl.

I've been to Stirling, if that helps?