aintforever

That's ******, the club wouldn't give a **** about what's written on here or twitter - they would have made their decision based on the dull football and poor attendances.

This but with Davis instead of Tadic.

Anyone who thinks Puel was fired because of what a few people wrote on a message board is a ****ing idiot. No surprise to see a few on here.

Wouldn't be surprised if the new owners wanted to bring in their own people anyway.

I would try three at the back so that the wing backs provide the width (both Cedric and Bertrand are decent going forward). Then play two up front - I don't think any of our strikers are suited to playing on their own up front like Pelle or Lambert were. I would play: Forster VVD Hoedt Stephens Cedric Romeo Lemina Bertrand Davis Gabbi Long

You can't blame the fans, I can't remember many people clamouring for Pelegríno. The buck stops with Les Reed, he could have hired Silva a week after the end of last season except he ****ed around for weeks and missed out.

The worrying thing is we look so ****e after such easy fixtures, ****ing up winnable home games early in the season saw us relegated last time. Nothing wrong with the thread, the fixture list gave us a good opportunity to be around the top of the table early on but we have failed miserably.

It's gonna be a relegation scrap this year, we couldn't score last year and have gone into this season weaker up front.

This, could have sacked Puel the day after the season ended and hired Silva. God knows why we waited around for so long.

This. He's the only one with the brains and movement to link it all together.

This.

Or put another way, all we achieved prior to Reed joining was get out of League 1 at the second attempt, bank rolled by a billionaire and with a squad that contained Rickie Lambert, Morgan Schneiderlin, Adam Lallana, Jose Fonte and Alex Oxlade Chamberlain. And even then we finished behind Brighton. Way to go Cortese.

Bit late with this one fella, we've had this discussion. Leave won and the button's been pressed.

I think he's superb, Labour couldn't ask for a better recruitment tool. Every time Mogg appears on TV spouting his dated, bigoted views it makes Corbyn seem more of a decent, normal person.

I get the arguments, but you said it would be 'weird' for someone to consider abortion in the event of rape because of their religious beliefs. If your wife or daughter got raped and she was catholic you may or may not agree with her having it aborted but it would be a stretch for anyone to say choosing abortion would be 'weird'. Going through rape must be hard enough let alone dealing with the emotion and pain of pregnancy and childbirth afterwards. IMO only a heartless **** would deny the victim that right.

It wouldn't really be weird though would it. It would just mean that person had some sort of understanding of the circumstances and sympathy for the person involved. And a realisation that their beliefs are based on a centuries old work of fiction.

I doubt homophobic views have anything to do with his catholic faith, more likely to do with losing 'soggy biscuit' at boarding school.

Just because he looks miserable doesn't mean he wants to leave, could be any reason.

Had the same issue with my little one. Weird thing is I was tempted to go through with it because it is just the norm but I'm glad I didn't. I will leave it up to her to decide what religion/fairytales she wants to believe in.

That's why I didn't get married in a church, it would have been hypocritical. You can get married almost anywhere nowadays.

Agree with what you say except marriage is nothing to do with religion, there wasn't one mention of God, Jesus or any other fairytale creatures in my wedding.

What like making kids go to church, or dragging a boy to Fratton Park to watch **** football? Children have always been pushed in certain directions, just because those guys are different to you doesn't make them wrong.

It doesn't say they gave their child hrt - or did I miss that?

Live and let live, as long as the kid is happy it's not a problem.

I dunno, I think a large proportion would gladly see the back of him but 99% is very optimistic. I think you underestimate the power of state propaganda. I expect most just don't know how poor their standard of living is compared to the rest of the World and those that are suffering will just blame the US and the sanctions. Plus with these sort of dictatorships there is always a percentage that side with the leader, not matter how appalling, because it feathers their nest. Also there is the history of Korea and their suffering from Americas bombs and their leader being their saviour which will shape their thinking. IF the Yanks star a war there it's going to be a right mess, the Chinese are the only people who can intervene IMO.