aintforever

Baker Street for us, hoping to get up and around Wembley quite early though. Don't give a **** if it's rammed, that's what it's all about.

Yes but he still won fair and square. Both candidates knew the rules and where they had to secure votes to get elected. trump would argue that had it been a simple popular vote he would have focused his canvassing on different areas instead of targeting the States he needed and there would have been a different outcome. How is their system any less fair than here where parties like UKIP and the greens don't get anywhere near the amount of seats their vote should give them?

It is **** funny, especially because he is supposed to be the most powerful man on the planet yet can't even get his own policies through. The media are a bunch of ****s, that's one thing he has got right. Funny thing is we now have a load of left wingers standing up for Fox News.

I don't have problem trusting experts' opinions but only a complete fool would trust politicians.

Is that from the polling experts who told us Cameron wouldn't win the GE and remain would win the referendum?

Whatever your views on their hooligan problem you have to say well done to the Russians for how well they have embraced the homosexual community within their football culture. Puts us to shame, you don't see that many openly gay men with their tight fitting shorts and matching tight t-shirts around the pubs on match days over here.

I can't see many fans wanting to go over there, I would actually prefer it if we didn't qualify. You just have to look on YouTube to see that they have a serious problem over there, even during the worst days of hooliganism over here it was never close to what Russia is like today. To be fair to the Russians though at least they want to fight unlike our hoolies who just want to act hard behind a line of coppers and film it on their phones. The English in France to a right old pasting, was men against boys.

Great, just secured my ticket up in the gods, now they put ones on sale where you can actually see the game properly!

It's the last time I buy a membership at the start of a season, completely pointless when you can just wait until the first high demand fixture.

Agree, there is little point dividing it down any further, those who most want tickets will be first online anyway.

The £56 ones are a bit steep considering it's like watching a game of subbuteo from 20 yards away.

A bit more confident after today. I think with United's fixtures and the fact that they are facing a right bun fight to get a CL spot mean that we may want it more, be better prepared and fitter than them on the day. Gabbiadini is on fire so that gives us a real puncher's chance. I just hope the CB situation doesn't prove to be our undoing.

Everyone's got a reason why they can't go to all the games. It makes little difference wether someone goes to 2 or 3 games IMO, they might as well open it up to all members and let the ones who want to go the most queue up on line and get tickets.

If we lose the cup final because of the centre backs he has still ****ed up.

I don't think they will bother with 4, 3, 2, 1 etc, I expect it will just be a members free for all. The original categories was just to get people to buy tickets for Saints reserves v Arsenal reserves. All the loyalest fans have tickets, I don't see what difference it makes wether someone has been to two or three games, it's just different degrees of plastic.

That's just what we needed in preparation for the Final. Now the lads can put their feet up and watch Utd play 3 more times before Wembley.

awesome result!

I reckon it will just go to a few days for members only, then a few days for anyone with a purchase history.

I had freebies in Club Wembley for last years FA cup final and they were as quiet as a mouse. Think most of the fans were their prawn sandwich lot not the usual away rabble.

The amount of green dots don't seem noticeably different to two days ago.

Perhaps a lot of people benefit, except the poor sods stuck on minimum wage.

Like I said, it is good for my company and so is good for me. But, when we hire a Pole it means there is a British person somewhere we have left on the dole - if you were him you might not have the same attitude. Rest assured, there is someone somewhere who can do your job better than you for a fraction of your salary as well.

Does the average tell the whole story though? Just because there are many high earning EU immigrants does not mean it's any easier for say English cleaners to compete with EU immigrants willing to work for less. Also if having access to an unlimited pool of cheap labour forces wages down, if forces down for everyone so naturally there are more English low wage earners showing up on the stats. We employ many Polish at my company, you get more for your money because most of them are over qualified and have a much better attitude because they have travelled so far to work. It's great for our company but it does mean that somewhere there is British people losing out.

Of course more higher income people voted remain, they are less likely to feel the negative effects of mass immigration. It's great being able to get some cheap Polish guys in to tile your new bathroom, not so great for the British tiler who has to compete.

Blimey, the only tickets left are up in the gods! Watched an England game from the back of the top tier before and the view is shockingly bad, bordering on pointless. I could barely make out wether a player was black or white let alone who they were.