aintforever

I'm just worried as to why he is doing all these interviews.

I think the problem is we cannot afford a new broom. When it comes to the end of the month and the club are 50k short of staying in business it just might be handy to have someone like Crouch around.

I dunno what your sexuality has got to do with it but I've been to a fair few art galleries, went to art school for 2 years and studied it as part of my degree course but still would rather have a football club than a few old paintings gathering dust somewhere. It might actually encourage art in Southampton if new young artists get more of a chance to showcase their work instead of a load of old crap. Anyway it was your spoiling for a fight I was pointing out.

LOL at Alpine trying to start an arguement. What sort of **** goes on a football message board of a club possibly about to go out of existence and bang on about how they would rather their council own £150mill worth of old paintings instead of a football club?

I think a football club is more valuable to the City than a bunch of old paintings, most of which are just stuck in storage somewhere. Common sense says flog a few and have a Council owned stadium.

I don't think Saints can be accused of any deliberate hanky panky like Leeds were, SLH has been around for ages, it is not like it was set up to avoid a points deduction.

I would be well happy with Souness running the show, he knows his stuff and is a winner.

What a load of fuss over nothing, if people want to leave early it's up to them. The players probably wouldn't even notice and any potential investor is not going to give a monkeys. I left early because I couldn't stand watching my team get outclassed by the worst team in the league. I couldn't give a monkeys what a bunch of spotty gimps in the Northam thought. I've had a ST for a decade and a week or so ago travelled the length of the country to watch a similar shower of ****e so I will leave early whenever I like, if anyone has a problem with that they are a dickhead.

Exactly, I still want to know why they didn't put us in admin before last Thursday's deadline? It was either very bad management or done out of spite, either way it has ****ed us up good and proper.

As it stands the club could still be ****ed, I fail to see your point.

I left right on the 3rd goal and I have a season ticket, only a dickhead would judge people by when they choose to leave the ground. ****ing retarded thick ****s the lot of em.

Complete ****, we're down and we deserve it.

Whoever sings that are retards.

Yes basically because Lowe put us into admin this week and not last we will probably start next season bottom of League 1 on -10. Or we pull off the great escape, only to be relegated by the Football League as they dock 10 points on the last day.

I think you can guarantee that there will be a points deduction, otherwise every club in the country will set up a holding company for next season. What I don't get is why did Lowe put us into admin just a few days after the deadline for taking the points hit this season - was it just out of spite? Whatever the reason it could have really screwed us up.

As much as I dislike Lowe I think he does have a point. Barclays can go **** themselves, they may well have killed our club, I'm gonna move my account.

Surely it will be £1 to anyone wiling to take on the debts?

dumb idea

To be fair Dennis Wise got Millwall to a FA Cup final and into Europe which is the same as Strachan and he's seen as a managerial god.

How could it possibly be a bad thing?!?

Derby did it, seems fair that we can as well.

I think you will find it's Barclays who have got their wish.

I don't believe we will be put in admin, it makes no sense to do it 5 days after the cut off point. I expect we are being fed the threat of admin just to make it easier to stomach when Lowe/Wilde buy SFC from the holding company.

That's no reason for the timing, Lowe would have known the deadlines and what they would mean. Admin could easily have been announced before the deadline.