Colinjb

What is your feeling on those comments Stanley?

Nick griffin also said: "while the BNP is not racist, it must not become multi-racist either. Our fundamental determination to secure a future for white children is restated, and an area of uncertainty is addressed and a position which is both principled and politically realistic is firmly established. We don't hate anyone, especially the mixed race children who are the most tragic victims of enforced multi-racism, but that does not mean that we accept miscegenation as moral or normal. We do not and we never will"." They view differing races as being unnaceptable within the UK, that is a dreadful anachronistic and xenophobic attitude that must dissappear for any nation or society to have a chance to survive in world affairs in the future. Describing 'mixed race' children as 'victims' is shocking to me. Frankly, how they say they are 'Not Racist' when they display such attitudes is baffling.

OH GOD, I hate that so much. There was a c**t back home in Colden Common who made a habit of asking for a double vodka orange come other peoples rounds. Utter w**ker.

90% of what the BNP though is utterly fine though. The 10% which covers the more unpallatable part of their agenda however makes them totally abhorent.

A bit blunt, but socialist ideas are widely open to social abuse, as can be seen by the hurrendous underclass culture that is undermining society today. The literally millions of people claiming benefits in this country are robbing the country not only of the money they claim, but they are not contributing anything on top! The actual cost of these innactive lot is immeasuarable because you cannot put a figure on the productivity they could otherwise produce. The bad legacy held by the Tories, particularly Thatcher's Tories due to the downturn and closure of manufacturing during her time in office was effected by the trade unions themselves participating in making the firms unviable along with world conditions making continued manufacture and base industries unecconomic is understandable. It is very easy to blame the one at the top for factors beyond their control, and considering the conditions we came through it bloody well. My opinion is though that the capitalist economy we have is incompatible with any kind of Labour government. Thatcher's ill considered speach regarding 'society not existing' was bloody ill advised but has serious elements of truth within it. Society is made up of individuals, unless those individuals are operating on all cylinders a society will not function. Right now, society is broken, a return to capitalist and tory ideals is a must for the nation to have a chance of fighting back. The 'Brown' method of spending out of a recession and letting this broken society take the debt on board is doomed to failure.

That's why my parents moved to Malta. Problem avoided.

Socialism: A nieve idea which fights against human nature in getting you to throw everything into one hat, lets the weak flourish due to the effort of the strong. Capitalism: One which embraces human nature, rewards the strong and skilled, punishes the lazy and weak. .....Pin removed, grenade thrown. Ladies and Gentlemen, discuss.......

People/Organisations who do good things and make a big deal out of it. Gold digging ******es.

Looks like i'll need it spelling out for me, so no, I really havn't covered myself in glory.

You can also legally shoot a witch within the city walls of York with a bow and arrow. Practicing wiccans beware!!!

If it is irrational and not based on experience, what grounding does it have?

Those are sky blue bibs, surely. And the blue away kit of the early 80's is outstanding.

As is every prime minister we have had over the last 30 years, they have all set the stage for the current mess Labour are exasperating.

I personally think it's ugly as sin, far too bulbous and gawky to be anything near good looking.

Good god i'm agreeing with Stanley about something!!!! Not sure what to feel right now....

Yeah, pretty basic stuff. The squad is young but needed supplimenting with senior players, 50/50 is the right ratio. The youth talent will sustain the club in future but championship survival is a must in the mean time. That was the gist of it.

I would ride her like seabiscuit.

Behind the team, yes? Behind Lowe and Wilde? F*ck no.

Like Middlesborough! Oh......

Southampton to Liverpool in December 2004 with my mate in tow. Both of us in a decrepid Rover 115 SD hammering up the A34/M40/M6. Appalling traffic, sh*t weather and the windscreen jets ran out of water. Had to stop many times to get the window clear! Took the mother of all cross country rat runs to avoid the M62/M6 junction, under up going via Crewe, Northwich and Runcorn. Made it with time to spare after all that only for my mate nearly denied admitence for having a can of Cider in his bag! Oh, and we lost 1-0......

True, regardless of how unsustainable they may have been though, it's well and truly f**ked their promotion chances, totally undermining the work they have been doing.

They were doing quite well! Bizare.

If by that you mean that a big 'thing' is made of it rather then letting people get on and watch the episode I agree. It's rediculous self gratifying sh*t the way organisations can come over as holier then thou just because they have played an equality card.

There is a very real difference between designers and draughsmen though. A good designer will need a sound grounding in engineering, if not full on experience in engineering himself. A draughsman or CAD operator does not, they just need to bring the concepts to realisation.

Absolutely. There is a massive shortfall of personel in parts of the engineering sector, but the drive is for experienced engineers, not freshfaced nieve yet enthusiastic ones.