VectisSaint

Nothing says I'm a ***** who knows nothing about football like people who tell other people they know nothing about football...

Rachel Riley is literally perfect. As such she would never go for someone who confuses to and too Sorry, had to be done.

This is a Tranny, Southampton's finest: Cross-dressing came much later

I don't have any Horlicks boxes, funny you should mention that, I used to deliver Horlicks, summer job when I was a student, original white van man, Tranny with Horlicks written on the side.

He is also not a bad player when he turns up, he was quite decent for Swindon before getting into trouble and remember he has played in the PL. He may be a tool, but he is still a decent player, much like our beloved Osvaldo.

or a student... CatchupTV is your friend... Graeme Le Saux was also on but not as a contestant. Also rachel Riley is worth watching even if MLT is not on the show. First time I have stooped to watching daytime TV since retiring.

Was it just coincidence that the first 6 letters of the conundrum were MALIBU? Matt's favourite tipple. He is very good at this Countdown stuff.

How can he score infinitely more than Davis (6 goals for Saints) or even JWP (2 goals for Saints). I hope he does score, but I'm not expecting that from him, he is more defensively minded (though RK may be converting him into a more offensive role) and like Davis and JWP I expect him to be creating chances (note that does not mean assists) for others, an occassional goal would be a bonus.

Pelle is exactly what the slow, cumbersome Chelsea defence needs, he would be playing into their hands. What we need is pace up front, a combination of JRod, Mane and Shlong would give Chelse real nightmares.

How? Scored in one game, was awful in the one he scored in for 2/3 of the match, didn't play in one and drew a blank, including missing a sitter in the other two. Just can't see how that is "fairly reliable".

Of the nominations it probably has to be Mane, but no-one really stands out. Trouble is everyone has been so inconsistent during September. Everyone was awful for most of the match against Man U, though Pelle did play well for first part and last 10 minutes (after he had asked to be subbed). Pelle was very average on Saturday and missed an absolute sitter after being set up by Juanmi for one of the simplest chances he will ever get. Virgil was terrible against Man U, but good on Saturday. Norwich was in August so doesn't count (September games are WBA, Man U, MK Dons and Swansea). Tadic went missing for most of the Man U game. Mane has not been at his best, but at least scored against Swansea plus 2 against MK Dons, so think he is probably the most deserving.

Goes with the one we used to have of Jonathan Forte.

It will soon be like the Terracotta Army outside the stadium with all the proposed statues. But I would add Big Ron to the list, probably more worthy than any of the others mentioned (who are all still alive anyway, don't agree with statues of living people)

You mean this? https://1cantoris.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/scan02434.jpg You don't feel it's a bit over the top?

My God, it's dog eat dog out there.

0-1 Sunderland, terrible defending by Caulker from a corner

Gazza, Mugabi, Debayo, Gape, McCarthy, Caulker, McQueen, Little, Seager, Hesketh, Sims Subs Isted, Isgrove, Jones, Olomola, Cook According to Twitter

Lawro not so stupid after all

JWP and Steven Davis don't get many opportunities to replicate this in the U21s.

Best squad for sure. Might not be best starting XI quite yet. Only problem is goalkeeper, but then the position has been poorly covered for years, its no worse now, you could argue with a decent loanee and an injured England international that is stronger than before, but in truth with FF out long term, we are in the **** if The Stek gets injured.

"Its" It is not a possessive pronoun.

What a load of tosh, you really are a muppet. Accusing others of not watching the game when it is quite clear it was you who either didn't watch it or didn't appreciate what was happening. I am quite a critic of JWP but he actually played very well on Saturday (at least for 60-odd minutes) doing all of the things you say he didn't do, good passes, a great corner, harrying, tackling (yes I found it hard to believe) and showing a lot of desire and energy, he does seem to have found a yard of pace that was previously missing. Played together well with Davis again, who was one of the best players on the park, with lots of energy, pin-point passes (and some that were a hair's breadth away from being so). It was so noticeable that soon after he was subbed off when we were 3-0 up that the energy levels dropped and we resorted to the same awful play that we exhibited for 50 minutes against Man U (strangely coinciding with the time before Davis was subbed on). OK, so he cannot score for toffee at the moment, just like JWP, but we have plenty of others who can, and who do largely due to the work that these two are putting in. JWP has improved immeasurably since playing a deeper role, as he did with Romeu when Vic threw his toys out of his pram. Criticism where its due, but try not slagging people off who actually take notice of what has happened in a game instead of spewing rubbish based on your preconceived misconceptions.

Sent off more times than Vic.

Very funny. Played more than half of the match yesterday avoiding making tackles because he stepped over the line too often early on and got booked. Romeu should grow his hair a bit so that he does not look like a thug, he gets booked before he hardly makes a tackle, most of his bookings (though not the one yesterday) have so far not been warranted - he is a marked man already though which is a concern.

That's the trouble with making an assessment based purely on the score. It was a debacle for 50 minutes (we were great for 35 minutes at the start), one of the most shockingly awful displays by Saints I have seen in nearly 50 years. Man U were awful and we let them score 3 goals from 3 on-target shots.