Window Cleaner

But the plane did not land, I presume you haven't seen the Inmarsat/AAIB projected paths, analysis of Doppler effects shows it must have gone south, then basic trigonometry shows it's rough path, nowhere to land but in the drink. The only possible landing point on that path would be the Kerguelen Islands but they're too far south and my colleagues tell me they've not seen a 777 there of late.There is no possible reason to continue to mantain that the aircraft landed somewhere unless of course you chuze to discount all the information which is to date available.

then we'll be getting 25p from Jake's Corner Chipie

I'm not arguing, just thought I saw a reference to West Brom's shirt sponsorship bringing in 5 times the amount of ours. It's certainly an area we can do far,far better in.

Not 5 times less than West Brom's though is it ?

Basically all of thse "top clubs" need 2 good players for every position, that's the model they work on. As MU won't be in the CL next season perhaps their requirements wll be slightly less. Anyway football pundits with a penchant for some club or other are like kids in candy shops, they want everything whether they have any possibility of eating it all or not.

777-200. To reach the assumed area in which the plane finally fell into the ocean the aircraft would need to stay high, the lower you fly the more fuel it consumes, basic turbofan science tells you that. Plus there's the mysterious "final ping" at 08.19 which may have indicated that the plane either hit the water at exactly that time or for some reason the ACARs system was either intentionally powered up or engines stopping forced it into SATCOMM mode again.

Well there's something you can construct a nutjob theory from then, the Chagossians hijacked it and tried to fly it to their spiritual home. It would have ended up in the drink for sure.

planes land there all of the time, it's above all a US Navy Base, from time to time they do charter flights from the US to change the personnel and bring supplies. Don't know the frequency nowadays though, probably once or twice a week. Don't know why Pap is keeping on about this really.

Not at all, it's just a ref. Publicly humiliated, everyone can see that it was the lino who c*cked up anyway. Linos cock up every week and frankly some of those mistakes are far more decisive than who gets sent off for a team who were going 3-0 down anyway. Sending off Gibbs didn't change the end result in any shape or form apart from the number of goals they lost by.

Can't see what you're moaning about, we've not lost any game Mariner has reffed for us this season. 3 games, 7 points. Last Saturday wasn't his fault, lino saw the handball and obviously incorrectly identified the player. No skin off our nose who he sends off for the Arse, they were 2-0 down, it was a penalty so it was 3-0 anyway. They wouldn't have done much better at 11 than they did with 10.

We have another CFO now, can't remember his name, Rogers had quit/been sacked (don't know which) and was brought back after Cortese left.

Anyway the table is fluid Hull were 10th when we beat them back in November, I'm sure that there are other possible cases.

Might even be over 100 million soon, if it isn't already. This year's football receipts will probably be around 100 million alone.

I think many wanted that John Williams bloke, not me personally because I know nothing about him. However being a "Saints Fan" seems to make one desirable for any position no matter what other capacities one might or might not have. Perhaps Mr Williams didn't want to be number 2 3 or 4, in charge of the rubber stamp.

To be fair it's not the same thing really. A first team manager/coach has a direct effect on the team, a CEO doesn't really, especially when it's pretty clear that he's the number 2 anyway.

So then never ending unanswered question, why did he resign before ? Presuming that the information that we received that he was working out his notice until 31st January and his leaving gift was already acquired was correct of course. That's one of the problems of this forum, people are always eager to give out snippets of information but never willing to back them up with reasons or explanations.

Good.

Could be suicide, could be big bravery from a crew that had been hijacked for a terrorist attempt, knew everyone was going to die anyway so made it so that only those on board were victims and not thousands of people on the ground somewhere.

And the maximum contract length is 5 years, could be just another year and more money I guess. Trouble with Lallana is whatever we may sell him for we absolutely have to give Bournemouth 25%, so if we did sell him for say 24 million (easy math for me) we'd have to give them 6 million. Wonder if we've ever tried to renogociate that with them, say a 3 million £ hand out now for all future sell-on rights.

As you wish, although I think you jest sire.. The evidence is that there is no evidence.

No it didn't, take that as read, it's just made up ******.

Honestly those reports were never sustainable, if an unidentified aircraft had flown that low over the Maldives it would appear on the OTH radars at Diego, it obviously didn't so it didn't. It was always a crock of crap. They might have seen a low flying aircraft but it wasn't MH370.

tbh I told you all that 2 weeks ago.

The exact same theory was being put about from about the 12/14th March onwards, seems the Malaysians didn't want to accept until they had some sort of solid basis to uphold it, they still don't really but I guess they just grew tired of all the circus in KL.

He will get better, he's snatching at his final ball/shot just now, might help if he started futher forward instead of presenting himself around the penalty box after an 60 yard dash.