From Eling's post above : "One of the reasons for this is that the Administrator has not generated expected funds from the sale of other CSI businesses that might have assisted the club's position".
Is not the administratgor of CSI raising funds, from the assets, to satisfy the creditors of CSI ? Is it legit practice to try to dispose of asset 'A' and pump the proceeds into asset 'B' in an attempt to keep 'B' afloat, and therefore boost the ( limited in this case ) chance of selling it.
And once again, if PFC were banking on funds from CSI to keep them solvent during November & December, this is surely an admission that they are 'inextricably linked'.