Jump to content

An interesting read on Alan Pardew


Wildgoose
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sport psychology, simple framework I'm beginning to warm to him. He seems to believe in everything we aren't. Our lot are in for a steep learning curve and a few are going to disappear without trace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If internal and external harmony coalesce we are approaching sporting excellence. It is unity within a club which encourages this. Uncertain futures lead to uncertain performances. Leeds is the perfect example. Harmony off the field leads to success on it."

 

Exactly the change we have hopefully made.

 

The internal fighting and disunity of the RL and subsequent years to a club unified from top to bottom.

 

A company in turmoil is destined to fail. Same for a football club.

 

Our part in this is to have the patience and show support through thick and thin, good and bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All i can say to many on this forum is look at the differing responses between this and when one of the world's best sports psychologists (SCW) was at this club, and even back in march when Wotte was talking about it. The response on here was almost 100% negative, and yet here we are. I will even use a psychological, yet simple, term to explain it - attitude towards an indivual/individuals - SCW/MW = negative (wotte talked about it after we had lost); AP = positive.

 

Got to say the article is good in that it is positive towards AP but, as an article, lacks alot of detail and is padded out. i am actually quite f===ed off that i just wasted 2 minutes of my life reading that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All i can say to many on this forum is look at the differing responses between this and when one of the world's best sports psychologists (SCW) was at this club, and even back in march when Wotte was talking about it. The response on here was almost 100% negative, and yet here we are. I will even use a psychological, yet simple, term to explain it - attitude towards an indivual/individuals - SCW/MW = negative (wotte talked about it after we had lost); AP = positive.

 

Got to say the article is good in that it is positive towards AP but, as an article, lacks alot of detail and is padded out. i am actually quite f===ed off that i just wasted 2 minutes of my life reading that!

 

Think you're missing the RL-part of the SCW-debacle.. We were just relegated, had sold our best players and the money spend on SCW, many felt should have been spend on players that could get us back in the Prem. RL made a bad decision, failed to act on it before the damage was done and the rest... well.... that's history...

 

Now we have a new owner, new optimism through-out the entire orginisation and a manager who knows how to put the psychology into use (more of what Hoddle did during his tenure). Not the experiment that was SCW, but a tried, tested and functional version of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you're missing the RL-part of the SCW-debacle.. We were just relegated, had sold our best players and the money spend on SCW, many felt should have been spend on players that could get us back in the Prem. RL made a bad decision, failed to act on it before the damage was done and the rest... well.... that's history...

 

Now we have a new owner, new optimism through-out the entire orginisation and a manager who knows how to put the psychology into use (more of what Hoddle did during his tenure). Not the experiment that was SCW, but a tried, tested and functional version of it.

all i can say is that there is no way SCW would have been a 'failed experiment' if the fans and others hadn't rigorously opposed further involvement in the 1st team that he was meant for during/post Redknapp. the 'resources' piled into SCW's appoinment would have been no greater than the purchase of an average right back - doubt that would have significantly improved the team that finished 12th or whatever it was (the team is greater than 11 individuals, as Mourinho says).

 

--btw don't think i was a lowe-luvvie cos apart from SCW, virtually everything else he did i will never forgive him for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all i can say is that there is no way SCW would have been a 'failed experiment' if the fans and others hadn't rigorously opposed further involvement in the 1st team that he was meant for during/post Redknapp.

 

I'll give you the others, i.e. Redknapp himself and some of the other coaching staff and players having an impact on the "experiment", but the idea that the fans somehow put the kibosh on the whole project is somewhat stretching it IMHO.

 

For me SCW was potentially the right man, but totally at the wrong time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All i can say to many on this forum is look at the differing responses between this and when one of the world's best sports psychologists (SCW) was at this club, and even back in march when Wotte was talking about it. The response on here was almost 100% negative, and yet here we are. I will even use a psychological, yet simple, term to explain it - attitude towards an indivual/individuals - SCW/MW = negative (wotte talked about it after we had lost); AP = positive.

 

Got to say the article is good in that it is positive towards AP but, as an article, lacks alot of detail and is padded out. i am actually quite f===ed off that i just wasted 2 minutes of my life reading that!

 

yes, SCW was the sporting psychologist who announced prior to the ill-fated 2005 Series in New Zealand that studies have proven that "winning teams wear red"...sure did the Lions a lot of good as they got hammered 3-0.....as for those who believe SCW was the reason we won the RWC in 2003, Mrs Woodward could've picked the team and it would've won...we won because of 4 players, Johnson, Wilkinson, Dallaglio and Robinson.....Woodward is a guy who puts structures in place and then fills those structures with well-qualified people...he himself was a moderate old 1st Division coach but who was smart enough to recognise his limitations and learn from others, such as when he took a holiday to the States and visited Gridiron set-ups, noting down every detail of their set-up to the extent of locker configurations....given time, unlimited resources (note that he has already asked the BOA for increased funding to deliver his '2012 vision') and the flexibility to experiment, he may have been successful with us...given that those elements weren't in place following our relegation, he didn't have them to play with....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theres a bloke used to work for us might be able to help, Woodward or something I think it was ;)

 

Absolutely! I think Sports Psychology can have a big part to play and have always been interested in it

 

I agree with Um Pahars re Mr Woodward though......right man, wrong time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give you the others, i.e. Redknapp himself and some of the other coaching staff and players having an impact on the "experiment", but the idea that the fans somehow put the kibosh on the whole project is somewhat stretching it IMHO.

 

For me SCW was potentially the right man, but totally at the wrong time.

 

I dont think SCW would have been accepted anytime with Lowe involved.

 

 

Little concerned with comments from Charlton fans as Pardew said the same things he is saying now when he first went to the Valley.

 

After five years of constant bad news regarding the Saints results perhaps I really cannot believe things are going to change for the better.

 

The current squad will be increased with new players and new coaches and most are not that bad so I dont really know why I am slightly worried but I am

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did not think SCW was a sports psychologist , he just employed them.

but i may be wrong

 

He probably like you could spell it and had an understanding of it use unlike Harry who probably could not spell it either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't be that great or Championship/Premiership clubs would have been after him, have been enough vacancies recently

 

..bearing in mind that its a Board of Directors who appoint managers, the majority of Chairmen seem to want some tough, old player who screams at the players in training, and swears at the ref. on match days.They fit the bill.

 

Not much room for an intelligent thinker, who has an overview of everything

and doesn't want all the glory himself. The main problem is that most Chairman have the money but not the football savvy. It takes a good businessman to MAKE money, but a wise one to know HOW to spend it.

 

We've seen that in our club recently and many others in the past. I think ML knows exactly what he's doing and he's not expecting to do it before Christmas...IMHO, AP seems to be an inspired choice

,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think SCW would have been accepted anytime with Lowe involved.

 

 

Little concerned with comments from Charlton fans as Pardew said the same things he is saying now when he first went to the Valley.

 

After five years of constant bad news regarding the Saints results perhaps I really cannot believe things are going to change for the better.

 

The current squad will be increased with new players and new coaches and most are not that bad so I dont really know why I am slightly worried but I am

 

Yes, there will always be that element of doubt until we see the results roll in after the season is underway. I was certainly nervous when they appointed Strachan but look how successful he was with Saints. I think it all depends on the club and the manager. Sometimes it just clicks and when it does, things go well. Let's hope that Pardew clicks with Saints!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, there will always be that element of doubt until we see the results roll in after the season is underway. I was certainly nervous when they appointed Strachan but look how successful he was with Saints. I think it all depends on the club and the manager. Sometimes it just clicks and when it does, things go well. Let's hope that Pardew clicks with Saints!

 

I agree but every time I think things are getting better things get worse thats all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCW- Wrong sport

 

He never had a chance here. It was an interesting appointment that could have worked, but everyone turned against him because of the constant sniping, leaking & lobbying from a certain master of the art (second only to Princess Diana) - one Harry Redflapps. Rather than embrace something new he saw SCW as a threat (perhaps rightly so) and effectively drove him out. He has history on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...