Jump to content

Cameron - "UK was a junior partner"


Thedelldays
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cameron: "I think it's important in life to speak as it is, and the fact is that we are a very effective partner of the US, but we are the junior partner," the PM told Sky News.

 

"We were the junior partner in 1940 when we were fighting the Nazis."

 

 

Sorry Dave but the US wasn't even at war in 1940. In fact there weren't even any non-Commonwealth countries for the UK to be partners with let alone be junior partners. Dreadful stuff from Dave that won't go down well with the blue-rinse brigade or those of us who would like a less deferential relationship with the states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cameron: "I think it's important in life to speak as it is, and the fact is that we are a very effective partner of the US, but we are the junior partner," the PM told Sky News.

 

"We were the junior partner in 1940 when we were fighting the Nazis."

 

 

Sorry Dave but the US wasn't even at war in 1940. In fact there weren't even any non-Commonwealth countries for the UK to be partners with let alone be junior partners. Dreadful stuff from Dave that won't go down well with the blue-rinse brigade or those of us who would like a less deferential relationship with the states.

Im flabbergasted that he said that about 1940!!!! The Mail will soon put him right
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would add that the US & Great Britain were both very much 'junior partners' when compared to the enormous sacrifices made by the Red Army & the Soviet people during WWII . Nevertheless the stand made by Britain & its empire (almost alone from May 1940 to June 41) was crucial in the eventual defeat of the Axis .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would add that the US & Great Britain were both very much 'junior partners' when compared to the enormous sacrifices made by the Red Army & the Soviet people during WWII . Nevertheless the stand made by Britain & its empire (almost alone from May 1940 to June 41) was crucial in the eventual defeat of the Axis .

 

Not disagreeing with you, but the enormous losses suffered by the Red Army and the civilian Russians were caused in the main by the brutal and merciless military tactics employed by Stalin on his own troops and people - basically 'don't worry, there's plenty more where they came from!!' He even carried on killing them after the war because they had been POW's and were, therefore, traitors.

 

As far as David Cameron's ignorant outburst goes, well, he's a politician, which probably explains it. We know they're talking shoyt because their lips are moving.

Edited by RonManager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cameron had a better education than 99.9% of the British population, so this was a pathetic mistake to make.Personally I'm fed up with the whole "special relationship", "Lapdog" "Junior parner" pony that British politicans seem to have indulged in since Mrs T and RR, our whole Foregin affairs policies for the past 30 years have been measured against our closeness to the US.The French,Germans and the rest of Europe owe us & the Americans their freedom (along with countless brave people from the world over) and yet they still speak out when we're wrong and look after their own interests. Our Foregin policy should not be based on WW2 alliances and the cold war.

 

Broadening the discussion slightly, there is a anti American feeling in this Country and some of it is down to the approach our Senior officals take to them. I've lived and worked there and met some lovely people, there are also plenty of arseholes (much like most other countries). I'm convinced that our leaders sucking up to them contributes to the hatred some people feel for the Country.America was built up by millions of poor immigrants, I just fail to understand the left's, and it is mainly the left's, hatred of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broadening the discussion slightly, there is a anti American feeling in this Country and some of it is down to the approach our Senior officals take to them. I've lived and worked there and met some lovely people, there are also plenty of arseholes (much like most other countries). I'm convinced that our leaders sucking up to them contributes to the hatred some people feel for the Country.America was built up by millions of poor immigrants, I just fail to understand the left's, and it is mainly the left's, hatred of it.

 

Perceived American imperialism I think is the root cause of this, however that is not to say that I believe America went into Iraq purely for 'democracy'...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would add that the US & Great Britain were both very much 'junior partners' when compared to the enormous sacrifices made by the Red Army & the Soviet people during WWII . Nevertheless the stand made by Britain & its empire (almost alone from May 1940 to June 41) was crucial in the eventual defeat of the Axis .

 

I don't think anyone with any knowledge about WW2 would argue that the war wasn't won on the Eastern Front but 1940 was a seminal point in this nations history and stretched into 1941 with the Battle Of The Atlantic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broadening the discussion slightly, there is a anti American feeling in this Country and some of it is down to the approach our Senior officals take to them. I've lived and worked there and met some lovely people, there are also plenty of arseholes (much like most other countries). I'm convinced that our leaders sucking up to them contributes to the hatred some people feel for the Country.America was built up by millions of poor immigrants, I just fail to understand the left's, and it is mainly the left's, hatred of it.

 

I lived and worked in the States and as a people I found them really nice. However, their insistence that "The American Way" is the only way irks the left. The survival of the fittest ethic does not sit comfortably with the liberal democracies of Europe where our brand of social democracy is more inclusive.

 

In addition, the war in Iraq (to a lesser degree Afghanistan) is seen by plenty as an American war of aggression that we were dragged into. That war certainly changed the view of people I know who were indifferent at best about the yanks beforehand.

 

All, of course, IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lived and worked in the States and as a people I found them really nice. However, their insistence that "The American Way" is the only way irks the left. The survival of the fittest ethic does not sit comfortably with the liberal democracies of Europe where our brand of social democracy is more inclusive.

 

In addition, the war in Iraq (to a lesser degree Afghanistan) is seen by plenty as an American war of aggression that we were dragged into. That war certainly changed the view of people I know who were indifferent at best about the yanks beforehand.

 

All, of course, IMHO.

 

I do tend to agree with that.

 

I think the most misunderstood people of the devoloped world are the American South, they are protrayed either as hillbillies or racists. I found them to be neither and amongst the nicest people I've ever met. Then again I find the French pretty friendly as a whole, so perhaps I'm a bit strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not disagreeing with you, but the enormous losses suffered by the Red Army and the civilian Russians were caused in the main by the brutal and merciless military tactics employed by Stalin on his own troops and people - basically 'don't worry, there's plenty more where they came from!!' He even carried on killing them after the war because they had been POW's and were, therefore, traitors.

 

As far as David Cameron's ignorant outburst goes, well, he's a politician, which probably explains it. We know they're talking shoyt because their lips are moving.

 

I quite agree , Stalin was quite as murderous and brutal a dictator as any of his fascist opponents , in some ways he was actually more ruthless than Hitler .

 

This undeniable truth however shouldn't detract from the magnificent effort the Soviet people put into defeating Nazism , and the terrible price they paid . The point I was really trying to make is that we in the west do tend to underestimate the crucial role the Red Army played in the war . A few weeks after D-Day for instance the Soviets won what may well be the largest victory of WWII when then virtually destroyed the German 'Army Group Centre' (Operation Bragaton) - yet how many on here have even heard of this battle I wonder ?

 

As a patriot and a history fanatic I'm enormously proud of the heroic role our little country played in the war , but If I remember correctly around 9 out of 10 German battle casualties were actually suffered on the Eastern front - that is the true measure of where that terrible war was really won and lost .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That statement manages to be embarrassing in three different ways!

 

Firstly it's just plain inaccurate. Say what you like about our education system, but even the thickest of 10-year-olds know the rough chronology of the second world war; Jesus, apart from the Tudors it's the only bit of history most English kids have a half-decent grasp of! To have an Oxford graduate get something like that wrong is unbelievable.

 

Secondly, the grovelling "special relationship" guff spouted by UK politicians (which always has a slightly clingy, pathetic air to it) is becoming outright cringeworthy. The traditional dynamic between the two countries, with "WASP" Presidents with ties to the British Isles and a lingering (and entirely misplaced) sense of cultural inferiority on the part of the Americans in relation to us, passed into history years or perhaps decades ago. For a long time we have been just another European country to the people and government of the US; they just don't consider us all that important, for the very good reason that we're NOT that important! Hence there's no need to do all this gay sucking-up trying to save a "special relationship" which doesn't exist.

 

Thirdly, there's little reason to bring the second world war into a speech on modern transatlantic relations at all, aside from maybe a brief mutual pat on the back for the sacrifices made by GIs/Tommies during the war and how the fight against Nazism brought the nations closer together and all that sort of thing. It's just not relevant, and like I said our establishment really needs to move on from this obsolete "playing Greece to their Rome" bullsh*t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...