TopGun Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 A friend of mine went to some Sky Sports roadshow/sportsman's dinner last week and the hosts were MLT, Paul Merson and Chris Kamara (Stelling was on hols apparently). Someone asked MLT what was his highest basic wage at Saints and he said £4,000 per week. Seemingly Merson didn't know that at all and fell about laughing as he said he was being paid £35,000 per week at the same time by Villa. I'd guess MLT earns more nowadays in retirement as I've been told he gets £7,000 for each Saturday show and £2,000 for extra events like the roadshow evenings. Plus his extras from Flybe etc. Bit galling to think that a player like the forever injured Jason Euell is on three times MLT's wage 10 or so years on when we are in the CCC these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintstr1 Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 .............And worth every penny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yate Saint Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 So how much did Spurs offer him then?? I thought he was on 25k. I'm not sure if 4k is correct!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 He got much more than £4k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt SFC Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 I'm sure he got by fine on 4k. Over 200k a year, oh noooos poor matty. Have you got his paypal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
team-saint Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 jason euell isn't forever injured Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Landrew Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 I've heard Matt say his best ever week's basic was £8,000. But his win extras were apparently very good indeed. Mind you, 8K a week is very good too, to the average person. The best I've ever earned in 7 days was £7,250 before tax in 1990. That was a very nice job that lasted a couple of years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 Players need all that money because when they retire their arms and legs drop off and they can't work like the rest of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0108787 Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 i thought he was on about 12k with us at one point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 I've heard Matt say his best ever week's basic was £8,000. But his win extras were apparently very good indeed. Mind you, 8K a week is very good too, to the average person. The best I've ever earned in 7 days was £7,250 before tax in 1990. That was a very nice job that lasted a couple of years. Thank you for that. Really added a lot to the thread. Touch 'look at me' perhaps StL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordswoodsaints Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 i know for sure he earned more than £4k. he also had a clause in his renegotiated contract that allowed him to earn as much as the highest paid player at the club and i think that at the time beattie was earning £16k so he must of at least matched that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silversaint Posted 6 November, 2008 Share Posted 6 November, 2008 Hang on is someone seriously claiming that jason mule is currently being paid 12k a week? Surely not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Landrew Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Thank you for that. Really added a lot to the thread. Touch 'look at me' perhaps StL Not at all. I merely put it there to illustrate how much ordinary footballers earn compared to avaerage people. That money was an exceptional week in an exceptional job. It it makes you feeel any better, I did consider not putting it there because it is private information to me, and nowadays I'm quite the pauper anyway. Perhaps you wrote your reply to get me to bite. well, perhaps you succeeded, because I won't be putting any of my personal information on this website anymore. There, I stepped back from the informal to the formal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Perhaps you wrote your reply to get me to bite. This place would be no fun if mods didn't bite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Farmer Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Tiss got a lot of nice big five figure 'signing on' fees whenever he signed a new contract though, which negated the fact his weekly wage was so low (and also help to remove the possibililty of any 'wages envy' with the any other so called 'stars' at the time). Saying that, for what he did for the club, and the fans, and the City of Southampton, he should of received 90% of the wages pot anyhow and the rest should of been thankful he wore the red and white of the once mighty Saints and kept them in all in designer Ray Ban sunglasses down at Los Marinos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stardustonmyfeet Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Thank you for that. Really added a lot to the thread. Touch 'look at me' perhaps StL Touch jealous perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Wolf Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Hang on is someone seriously claiming that jason mule is currently being paid 12k a week? Surely not? I thought it was more than that tbh...I thought it was 14-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubai_phil Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Nah come on everyone knows he was on 4k per day..... or was it 40? Almost as much as an Air Traffic Controller in Dubai (who's buying the first beer tomorrow) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danbert Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Not at all. I merely put it there to illustrate how much ordinary footballers earn compared to avaerage people. That money was an exceptional week in an exceptional job. It it makes you feeel any better, I did consider not putting it there because it is private information to me, and nowadays I'm quite the pauper anyway. Perhaps you wrote your reply to get me to bite. well, perhaps you succeeded, because I won't be putting any of my personal information on this website anymore. There, I stepped back from the informal to the formal. I fail to see your point. In what way does this information help us to understand what ordinary footballers earn compared to average people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_saints Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 So to sum up: Various people have supposedly heard Matty say various figures in relation to what he earned. As pretty much all of these "from the horses mouth" facts seem to differ, I thought I'd make it easier for you- No one f**king knows what his top basic wage was!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuz Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 I think that this has been dealt with before but quoting from page 26 of Matt Le Tissier Testimonial Magazine, May 2002: Matt: "Right - my basic weekly wage has never been above four grand a week!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_saints Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 I think that this has been dealt with before but quoting from page 26 of Matt Le Tissier Testimonial Magazine, May 2002: Matt: "Right - my basic weekly wage has never been above four grand a week!" But....but - people have HEARD HIM say he was on 15k a week!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxy Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 But....but - people have HEARD HIM say he was on 15k a week!!!!! He could well have been but the basic salary could still have been lower, but with all sorts of increments (games started, goals, wins, league position, image rights, signing on fees, loyalty bonuses, shares....) it would be fairly easy to structure a deal which kept a headline salary low. This could be particularly worthwhile for a Channel Islander Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fowllyd Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Tiss got a lot of nice big five figure 'signing on' fees whenever he signed a new contract though, which negated the fact his weekly wage was so low (and also help to remove the possibililty of any 'wages envy' with the any other so called 'stars' at the time). Saying that, for what he did for the club, and the fans, and the City of Southampton, he should of received 90% of the wages pot anyhow and the rest should of been thankful he wore the red and white of the once mighty Saints and kept them in all in designer Ray Ban sunglasses down at Los Marinos. Yep - whatever Le Tiss may or may not have been paid, it's impossible to argue with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Bob Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 How can Merson laugh at him when a) he was half the player b) he wasted all his money at the bookies and c) sky only employ him to keep him off the street I think you answered your own question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatch Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 He got to have a little fumble with Marilyn from Home and Away as well, so not all his rewards were financial. I mean, can you put a price on that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancake Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 He got to have a little fumble with Marilyn from Home and Away as well, so not all his rewards were financial. I mean, can you put a price on that! 10p? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 20p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Can't believe was only that. Others on much more. Dodd was on a basis more than double that near the end of his time as player here. MLT's last year was awful though. £1k pw basic. Am pretty sure was same again for squad selection and same again for an appearance. Although the guys from that era were paid poor basics they were paid high "appearance bonuses". It worked by getting a big lump sum for appearing in X number of games or matchday squads. Some clauses provided that "absence from games through injury suffered in a game or training after being selected for a squad" amounted to an appearance in all susequent games missed. Example, picked in squad then injured in training. Then miss 20 games but chalk up 20 "appearances". If you think about it many players would have been (and may still be ?) picking up bonuses without kicking a ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oz Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 I've heard Matt say his best ever week's basic was £8,000. But his win extras were apparently very good indeed. Mind you, 8K a week is very good too, to the average person. The best I've ever earned in 7 days was £7,250 before tax in 1990. That was a very nice job that lasted a couple of years. who did you play for, accrington stanley ressies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oz Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 I've heard Matt say his best ever week's basic was £8,000. But his win extras were apparently very good indeed. Mind you, 8K a week is very good too, to the average person. The best I've ever earned in 7 days was £7,250 before tax in 1990. That was a very nice job that lasted a couple of years. earned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mini_me Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Lets settle this once and for all on an unbiased poll Who is Saints all time Top Earner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cricketphilly Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 He could well have been but the basic salary could still have been lower, but with all sorts of increments (games started, goals, wins, league position, image rights, signing on fees, loyalty bonuses, shares....) it would be fairly easy to structure a deal which kept a headline salary low. This could be particularly worthwhile for a Channel Islander A close friend was senior at Fulham some years ago. He said that win bonuses doubled after each win on the bounce eg 500- 1000- 2000- 4000 etc, also that the players were paid bonuses for turning up for training on time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
positivepete Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 I was talking to Chris Kamara at a function last night, and he asked me the question, "Do you know how much MLT earned a week?", I replied "not much" and he said less than 4k. He is a Lallana fan, but knew nothing about Schneiderlin as he doesn't cover Championship this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Wayman Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 I'm amazed that Le Tiss was paid that much even! Seriously, somebody's taking the **** somewhere along the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Munster Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Some clauses provided that "absence from games through injury suffered in a game or training after being selected for a squad" amounted to an appearance in all susequent games missed. Example, picked in squad then injured in training. Then miss 20 games but chalk up 20 "appearances". If you think about it many players would have been (and may still be ?) picking up bonuses without kicking a ball. Also known as the "Pahars Clause". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wild-saint Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 klaus was on £21k per week at his peak. FACT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NI76 Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 klaus was on £21k per week at his peak. FACT Seeing as you can't even spell his forename name (and it's not difficult) I doubt very much you know for a fact what his salary was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NI76 Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 klaus was on £21k per week at his peak. FACT Seeing as you can't even spell his forename (and it's not difficult) I doubt very much you know for a fact what his salary was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wild-saint Posted 7 November, 2008 Share Posted 7 November, 2008 Seeing as you can't even spell his forename (and it's not difficult) I doubt very much you know for a fact what his salary was. and how does that effect my knowledge? The fact is i know im right regardless of how i spelt his name or regardless of whether you believe me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belgiansaint Posted 8 November, 2008 Share Posted 8 November, 2008 No matter how much he earned, with a player of Matty's class, Saints would be in the Prem with Prem attendances, Prem money and Prem players on Prem wages and they wouldn't be in this mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NI76 Posted 8 November, 2008 Share Posted 8 November, 2008 and how does that effect my knowledge? The fact is i know im right regardless of how i spelt his name or regardless of whether you believe me. Because if you know the guy that well that you know his exact weekly wage then you would know how to spell his first name. Quoting it as a fact when it is nothing of the sort unless you can back it up with evidence is no different to me saying I know for a fact that you are wrong and I dont care whether you believe me or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TopGun Posted 8 November, 2008 Author Share Posted 8 November, 2008 and how does that effect my knowledge? The fact is i know im right regardless of how i spelt his name or regardless of whether you believe me. Yes, but your poor grasp of English doesn't inundate others with confidence that you are right unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 8 November, 2008 Share Posted 8 November, 2008 im sure he was the highest paid player at the club and oakley and kachlouol were on at least 8k a week.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Landrew Posted 8 November, 2008 Share Posted 8 November, 2008 earned? Certainly..! I should point out that it was only one week in 2 years that I earned that wage. Because of the wage structure, some weeks it would be £320 gross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 8 November, 2008 Share Posted 8 November, 2008 I've heard Matt say his best ever week's basic was £8,000. But his win extras were apparently very good indeed. Mind you, 8K a week is very good too, to the average person. The best I've ever earned in 7 days was £7,250 before tax in 1990. That was a very nice job that lasted a couple of years. Certainly..! I should point out that it was only one week in 2 years that I earned that wage. Because of the wage structure, some weeks it would be £320 gross. Made it sound a tad different though...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Landrew Posted 8 November, 2008 Share Posted 8 November, 2008 Made it sound a tad different though...... Yes, I thought you'd got it a little miscontrued. I didn't mean it as a promo, but merely to illustrate that although I earned a half-decent salary, and an excellent one with bonuses, it was never the same as a professional footballer. And as someone has pointed out.. they don't have their arms and legs chopped off when they retire from football, so it's the same for all. To say that footballers today are paid obscene money would be a gross understatement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now