The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?

[Osvaldorama]

1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

Better hope you never get ill, burgled, or your house catches fire. Those non-existent public sector workers won't be there to help you.

Do you have children ? If so, do they go to state schools ? Would you prefer that your waste bins are emptied regularly and the street lights stay on ?

This is a stupid argument. 
 

All of those would exist without the state, they’d just be run a lot better because there would be proper incentives. 

[badgerx16]

12 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

This is a stupid argument. 
 

All of those would exist without the state, they’d just be run a lot better because there would be proper incentives. 

You said you "get zero in return", which is patently untrue.

[aintforever]

2 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:

I’m absolutely fine thanks, just sick of paying so much tax and getting zero in return except more taxes and government overreach 

Better get used to feeling sick then because you never get much in return, unless of course you are unlucky enough to get sick.

[Turkish]

1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Here it is

 

"Stare at a wall" that's a girl living a fulfiled live, fuck me 

[whelk]

8 minutes ago, Turkish said:

"Stare at a wall" that's a girl living a fulfiled live, fuck me 

She seemed intelligent enough and I thought she was probably taking the piss.  Or maybe she’s a Buddhist?

[AlexLaw76]

I wonder how it will be implement?

probably half arsed. All over 16: have to prove their age. Next thing, digital ID comes in to make it all much easier.

[Turkish]

5 minutes ago, whelk said:

She seemed intelligent enough and I thought she was probably taking the piss.  Or maybe she’s a Buddhist?

Possibly, although quite funny how she assumed Starmer would bottle it

[whelk]

Just now, Turkish said:

Possibly, although quite funny how she assumed Starmer would bottle it

Who would dare question Starmer’s bottle?!

[Osvaldorama]

33 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

I wonder how it will be implement?

probably half arsed. All over 16: have to prove their age. Next thing, digital ID comes in to make it all much easier.

Exactly.. he’s pretty much already said this. 
 

His ‘social media ban for under 16s’ is not a ban for under 16s.

It is a ban on *selected* social media for EVERYONE. Until you identify yourself

And it’s specifically targeting the platforms that show dissent against the current regime. (Blue sky, hive of the left wing and child predators) is absent from the list 

[Farmer Saint]

1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said:

Exactly.. he’s pretty much already said this. 
 

His ‘social media ban for under 16s’ is not a ban for under 16s.

It is a ban on *selected* social media for EVERYONE. Until you identify yourself

And it’s specifically targeting the platforms that show dissent against the current regime. (Blue sky, hive of the left wing and child predators) is absent from the list 

What's the problem with identifying yourself?