Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

Better hope you never get ill, burgled, or your house catches fire. Those non-existent public sector workers won't be there to help you.

Do you have children ? If so, do they go to state schools ? Would you prefer that your waste bins are emptied regularly and the street lights stay on ?


This is a stupid argument. 
 

All of those would exist without the state, they’d just be run a lot better because there would be proper incentives. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


This is a stupid argument. 
 

All of those would exist without the state, they’d just be run a lot better because there would be proper incentives. 

You said you "get zero in return", which is patently untrue.

Posted
2 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:


I’m absolutely fine thanks, just sick of paying so much tax and getting zero in return except more taxes and government overreach 

Better get used to feeling sick then because you never get much in return, unless of course you are unlucky enough to get sick.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Turkish said:

"Stare at a wall" that's a girl living a fulfiled live, fuck me 

She seemed intelligent enough and I thought she was probably taking the piss.  Or maybe she’s a Buddhist?

Posted

I wonder how it will be implement?

probably half arsed. All over 16: have to prove their age. Next thing, digital ID comes in to make it all much easier.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, whelk said:

She seemed intelligent enough and I thought she was probably taking the piss.  Or maybe she’s a Buddhist?

Possibly, although quite funny how she assumed Starmer would bottle it

Posted
Just now, Turkish said:

Possibly, although quite funny how she assumed Starmer would bottle it

Who would dare question Starmer’s bottle?!

Posted
33 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

I wonder how it will be implement?

probably half arsed. All over 16: have to prove their age. Next thing, digital ID comes in to make it all much easier.


Exactly.. he’s pretty much already said this. 
 

His ‘social media ban for under 16s’ is not a ban for under 16s.

It is a ban on *selected* social media for EVERYONE. Until you identify yourself

And it’s specifically targeting the platforms that show dissent against the current regime. (Blue sky, hive of the left wing and child predators) is absent from the list 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...