Sir Ralph Posted Sunday at 21:34 Posted Sunday at 21:34 (edited) 2 hours ago, Farmer Saint said: As long as it's not a poll of Daily Mail readers that's meant to be a poll of a cross-section of society, then yes that's fine. That’s fine. Well they definitely use a cross section so I’ll start quoting them (I’m sure you understand the point I’m making by saying this). If we really quoting Hope not Hate on here then to bludgeon Reform voters we might as well quote Palestine Action in relation to its “facts” about the war in Gaza Edited Sunday at 22:14 by Sir Ralph 1
Farmer Saint Posted Monday at 07:00 Posted Monday at 07:00 (edited) 9 hours ago, Sir Ralph said: That’s fine. Well they definitely use a cross section so I’ll start quoting them (I’m sure you understand the point I’m making by saying this). If we really quoting Hope not Hate on here then to bludgeon Reform voters we might as well quote Palestine Action in relation to its “facts” about the war in Gaza As I asked you, if the poll is a genuine, non-doctored poll, what are the issues with it being used? You understand the difference between a poll and facts presented by an organisation I would assume. Edited Monday at 07:12 by Farmer Saint
sadoldgit Posted Monday at 11:47 Author Posted Monday at 11:47 (edited) So Farage flew all that way to meet Trump and the meeting didn’t happen 😂 https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/nigel-farage-donald-trump-chagos-islands-403823/# https://leftfootforward.org/2026/03/nigel-farage-fails-to-secure-mar-a-lago-meeting-with-donald-trump/ Edited Monday at 11:49 by sadoldgit
31cc Posted Monday at 19:38 Posted Monday at 19:38 7 hours ago, sadoldgit said: So Farage flew all that way to meet Trump and the meeting didn’t happen 😂 https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/nigel-farage-donald-trump-chagos-islands-403823/# https://leftfootforward.org/2026/03/nigel-farage-fails-to-secure-mar-a-lago-meeting-with-donald-trump/ Perhaps he should invite Trump to Clacton. 3
moonraker Posted Tuesday at 01:55 Posted Tuesday at 01:55 6 hours ago, 31cc said: Perhaps he should invite Trump to Clacton. That means he would have to go there, so no chance. 2
sadoldgit Posted Tuesday at 12:20 Author Posted Tuesday at 12:20 10 hours ago, moonraker said: That means he would have to go there, so no chance. Unless he offered him the chance of building several golf clubs there.
31cc Posted Tuesday at 12:33 Posted Tuesday at 12:33 He wouldn't want a golf club there - this is the view out to sea from Clacton... 2
sadoldgit Posted Tuesday at 12:41 Author Posted Tuesday at 12:41 They’re killing the whales. They’re driving them crazy… 🤪
rallyboy Posted Tuesday at 14:17 Posted Tuesday at 14:17 Farage caught out blatantly lying again. His trial period as PM-in-waiting couldn't be going any worse - as an MP he's been exposed as someone who is incapable of even turning up to work and his Reform councils are in chaos. I wouldn't trust him to run a bath. 4
Turkish Posted Tuesday at 15:07 Posted Tuesday at 15:07 Interesting to note that despite this forum being overrun with right wing Farage, Trump and Robinson fan boys the most prolific posters on all 3 threads are those who vehemently claim to oppose them. None of the so called supporters appear to be even making any attempt to defend them. How odd
Sheaf Saint Posted Tuesday at 16:59 Posted Tuesday at 16:59 15 hours ago, moonraker said: That means he would have to go there, so no chance. 3
Gloucester Saint Posted Tuesday at 17:19 Posted Tuesday at 17:19 Just like his hero Trump, using politics as a personal enrichment vehicle. 1 1
Weston Super Saint Posted Tuesday at 17:21 Posted Tuesday at 17:21 21 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said: 13 soon when he releases his 'art of time management' seminars. 1 2
Sheaf Saint Posted Tuesday at 18:10 Posted Tuesday at 18:10 40 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Just like his hero Trump, using politics as a personal enrichment vehicle. Yep. He is and always has been nothing but a grifter. It scares me to think about how many people in this country are stupid enough to be taken in by such an obvious snake oil salesman. It's not often I find myself in agreement with Will Self, but his description of Farage on Question Time a few years ago as a "grubby little opportunist" was spot on. 3
Lord Duckhunter Posted Tuesday at 20:55 Posted Tuesday at 20:55 5 hours ago, Turkish said: Interesting to note that despite this forum being overrun with right wing Farage, Trump and Robinson fan boys the most prolific posters on all 3 threads are those who vehemently claim to oppose them. None of the so called supporters appear to be even making any attempt to defend them. How odd They’re obsessed. 1
whelk Posted Wednesday at 06:54 Posted Wednesday at 06:54 9 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said: They’re obsessed. It’s only the ‘floating voters’ who call him Nige
badgerx16 Posted Wednesday at 07:36 Posted Wednesday at 07:36 41 minutes ago, whelk said: It’s only the ‘floating voters’ who call him Nige As opposed to the voting floaters that support him unreservedly.
sadoldgit Posted Wednesday at 08:00 Author Posted Wednesday at 08:00 “Nige” looking the ridiculous fool yet again…not that his fan club will see it that way. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/mar/10/farage-delivers-energy-sermon-at-the-pump-just-dont-mention-the-war 1
east-stand-nic Posted Wednesday at 08:11 Posted Wednesday at 08:11 (edited) 14 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said: Just like his hero Trump, using politics as a personal enrichment vehicle. Unlike Starmer and the Minnesota governor who you support. Both making millions and millions while in power. Jeez, Myopic blinkered views yet again. See the big picture you dope. They are all doing it. The Clintons are rich as hell AFTER his term in the hot seat. Stop the TDS and realise the truth, they are all self servicing cunts. Edited Wednesday at 08:18 by east-stand-nic 4
sadoldgit Posted Wednesday at 08:23 Author Posted Wednesday at 08:23 Yet this bloke is willing to “risk civilisation” on Rupert Lowe! It comes to something when “Nige” isn’t far right enough for his own members (eh, nic?). 1
badgerx16 Posted Wednesday at 12:25 Posted Wednesday at 12:25 8 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said: Obsessed Is that a comment on your following SOG everywhere he posts ? 2 1
Lord Duckhunter Posted Wednesday at 12:31 Posted Wednesday at 12:31 Yes, followed by you following me. 1 2
badgerx16 Posted Wednesday at 12:33 Posted Wednesday at 12:33 1 minute ago, Lord Duckhunter said: Yes, followed by you following me. I only do it to help boost your self-esteem. 2
sadoldgit Posted Wednesday at 12:47 Author Posted Wednesday at 12:47 (edited) 4 hours ago, east-stand-nic said: Unlike Starmer and the Minnesota governor who you support. Both making millions and millions while in power. Jeez, Myopic blinkered views yet again. See the big picture you dope. They are all doing it. The Clintons are rich as hell AFTER his term in the hot seat. Stop the TDS and realise the truth, they are all self servicing cunts. And yet you get your panties in a bunch whenever we slag off Trump and Farage and start ranting about “lefties” and “migrants” I’ll bite. Show me the evidence that Starmer is making millions out of his position please. Going back to you comments about migrants and my position on all sex offenders. We have reached a new level of stupidity when a paedophile apologist (you nic) attacks someone who posts consistently that all sex offenders should be viewed the same no matter what colour their skin or what religion they follow. You however only get upset on here about the small minority of sex offenders who arrive in small boats. Why? To make it crystal clear to you, in an ideal world we wouldn’t let any sex offenders into the country no matter how they arrive here, no matter the colour of their skin, no matter what religion they follow. Do you understand yet? If you finally do understand my position, I would also like to know what you propose to do to identify anyone arriving in this country as a potential sex offender so we can do something about them before they commit any offences. Finally, we are talking here about the maddest US president in history here. Not Biden. Not Obama. Not Clinton. Not one of these former presidents has acted in such a bizarre fashion and that is what we are talking about. I know it upsets you. But we are talking about the here and now. If you want to talk about history perhaps start another thread? Just realised that this is on the Reform thread 🤪😂 Edited Wednesday at 12:48 by sadoldgit 1
badgerx16 Posted Wednesday at 13:01 Posted Wednesday at 13:01 12 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: I would also like to know what you propose to do to identify anyone arriving in this country as a potential sex offender so we can do something about them before they commit any offences. I think you can answer your own question.
sadoldgit Posted yesterday at 08:58 Author Posted yesterday at 08:58 (edited) Reform UK Calls for Return to Simpler Britain When Porn Was in Hedges and Petrol Was Full of Lead. Reform UK has today unveiled a bold new vision for the country based on what it describes as “the simple, common-sense values that made Britain great”, including the return of leaded petrol and the rediscovery of mildly damp adult magazines in roadside hedgerows. Speaking at a press conference held next to a suspiciously well-stocked bush on the outskirts of Basildon, a party spokesperson said modern Britain had become “overly complicated”. “Back then things were straightforward,” they explained. “You filled your car with petrol that quietly lowered the nation’s IQ by a couple of points a decade, and if you wanted pornography you found it the traditional way — half hidden in a hedge, slightly rain damaged, and shared respectfully between local lads.” The spokesperson added that the country had “lost its way” since the decline of these traditional institutions. “Now everyone’s got the internet, unleaded petrol, and opinions. Frankly it’s exhausting.” Under the proposed plan, petrol stations would be required to offer a “Heritage Leaded” pump, while councils would receive government grants to discreetly seed hedgerows with copies of Razzle, Mayfair, and the occasional mysteriously waterlogged continental publication. Party figures insist the policy is about restoring national character rather than nostalgia. “Britain used to be a place where people didn’t question things,” the spokesperson said. “And with the right fuel additives, it could be again.” Rochdale Herald Edited yesterday at 08:59 by sadoldgit 3
Turkish Posted yesterday at 12:11 Posted yesterday at 12:11 This thread is a joke, like some of the others on here it’s completely pointless and simply a few obsessed people to post about how awful Farage/Reform are every day and others to nod along in agreement. “Oh look what Farage has done now isn’t he an idiot”, couple of likes maybe a reply rinse and repeat every day for months I guess it makes them feel superior and popular but it’s bloody tragic 4
iansums Posted yesterday at 12:18 Posted yesterday at 12:18 6 minutes ago, Turkish said: This thread is a joke, like some of the others on here it’s completely pointless and simply a few obsessed people to post about how awful Farage/Reform are every day and others to nod along in agreement. “Oh look what Farage has done now isn’t he an idiot”, couple of likes maybe a reply rinse and repeat every day for months I guess it makes them feel superior and popular but it’s bloody tragic It certainly makes me feel inferior.
Turkish Posted yesterday at 12:20 Posted yesterday at 12:20 1 minute ago, iansums said: It certainly makes me feel inferior. I wouldn’t I expect SOG thinks the Rochdale Herald is a serious newspaper with this article being real, like that time he copy and pasted the Daily Mash trying to make that out. 😂
badgerx16 Posted yesterday at 15:14 Posted yesterday at 15:14 There really is no need to make out Reform are a joke they do it well enough themselves without additional help. 1
east-stand-nic Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago On 11/03/2026 at 19:47, sadoldgit said: And yet you get your panties in a bunch whenever we slag off Trump and Farage and start ranting about “lefties” and “migrants” I’ll bite. Show me the evidence that Starmer is making millions out of his position please. Going back to you comments about migrants and my position on all sex offenders. We have reached a new level of stupidity when a paedophile apologist (you nic) attacks someone who posts consistently that all sex offenders should be viewed the same no matter what colour their skin or what religion they follow. You however only get upset on here about the small minority of sex offenders who arrive in small boats. Why? To make it crystal clear to you, in an ideal world we wouldn’t let any sex offenders into the country no matter how they arrive here, no matter the colour of their skin, no matter what religion they follow. Do you understand yet? If you finally do understand my position, I would also like to know what you propose to do to identify anyone arriving in this country as a potential sex offender so we can do something about them before they commit any offences. Finally, we are talking here about the maddest US president in history here. Not Biden. Not Obama. Not Clinton. Not one of these former presidents has acted in such a bizarre fashion and that is what we are talking about. I know it upsets you. But we are talking about the here and now. If you want to talk about history perhaps start another thread? Just realised that this is on the Reform thread 🤪😂 LOL like fuck at this post. You are the pedo apologist as you love muslims and want us to let them in and allow them to roam the streets raping women and kids. I want it stopped, you dont. So you are the one supporting it. It really is very simple. Do illegal immigrant commit rape crimes, yes or no. Answer = YES So, have rape crimes increased since we let them in, yes or no. Answer = YES So, are our women and children at more risk or less risk by letting them in? Answer = MORE You cannot and will not accept it. Your need to virtue signal is more important that the safety of women and children, That is pretty vile. Try posting on the right thread next time thicko pedo supporter.
Turkish Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) I don’t understand the hatred for Farage Sadam Hussain Pol Pot Stalin Ze Dong Leopold II Hitler where does Farage sit amongst those in the worlds worst political figures? Anyone with any intelligence can see that he’s hardly the dictator of the century Edited 11 hours ago by Turkish
badgerx16 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 36 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said: LOL like fuck at this post. You are the pedo apologist as you love muslims and want us to let them in and allow them to roam the streets raping women and kids. I want it stopped, you dont. So you are the one supporting it. It really is very simple. Do illegal immigrant commit rape crimes, yes or no. Answer = YES So, have rape crimes increased since we let them in, yes or no. Answer = YES So, are our women and children at more risk or less risk by letting them in? Answer = MORE You cannot and will not accept it. Your need to virtue signal is more important that the safety of women and children, That is pretty vile. Try posting on the right thread next time thicko pedo supporter. Did postng that make you feel better ? 2
rallyboy Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said: you love muslims and want us to let them in and allow them to roam the streets raping women and kids. Marvellous to see that the bright-eyed high-flyer from the sixth form common room debating society hasn't lost any of his razor wit or epigram skills, it's as if Oscar Wilde and Noel Coward have been channelled to hilariously commentate on contemporary society. As funny as it is clever. 1
sadoldgit Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said: LOL like fuck at this post. You are the pedo apologist as you love muslims and want us to let them in and allow them to roam the streets raping women and kids. I want it stopped, you dont. So you are the one supporting it. It really is very simple. Do illegal immigrant commit rape crimes, yes or no. Answer = YES So, have rape crimes increased since we let them in, yes or no. Answer = YES So, are our women and children at more risk or less risk by letting them in? Answer = MORE You cannot and will not accept it. Your need to virtue signal is more important that the safety of women and children, That is pretty vile. Try posting on the right thread next time thicko pedo supporter. I think that you have just confirmed to everyone what they knew about you from the start nic, so well done for that. As they say, give someone enough rope… As for the “try posting on the right thread next time” comment. I was responding to your comment on this thread……..thicko! 1
sadoldgit Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago Just for you yet again nic. See if you understand it this time. To make it crystal clear to you, in an ideal world we wouldn’t let any sex offenders into the country no matter how they arrive here, no matter the colour of their skin, no matter what religion theyfollow. Do you understand yet? 1
Turkish Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, sadoldgit said: I think that you have just confirmed to everyone what they knew about you from the start nic, so well done for that. As they say, give someone enough rope… As for the “try posting on the right thread next time” comment. I was responding to your comment on this thread……..thicko! Says the guy that hangs himself, waits for the rope to snap then wraps it round his own neck and does it again. Time after time.
sadoldgit Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago (edited) I’m intrigued nic. We all know about Farage’s grifts both old and new but you say that Starmer is making “millions and millions” from being PM. I am sure a man of you huge intellect wouldn’t just make something up, so can you please give us the evidence of these money making schemes that you are so sure that Starmer is involved with? Thanks. (This is one of Farage’s latest for info) https://www.desmog.com/2026/01/07/nigel-farage-reform-uk-accepted-10000-gifts-from-abu-dhabi-uae-petrostate/ Edited 6 hours ago by sadoldgit
pingpong Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I'm not sure that "not as bad as Hitler" is the flex people think it is. 1
Turkish Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago On 06/02/2025 at 17:53, sadoldgit said: Adolf Hitler The Yorkshire Ripper Hugh Edwards Jack the Ripper Pol Pot Dr Harold Shipman Where does Hugh Edwards sit in this list of worst crimes in the world? Anyone with any level of intelligence would understand that my point was about the amount of prominent airtime he was given against other news stories that were bigger at the time than his actual crimes. As I said at the time, his crimes were dealt with in the magistrates court. More serious crimes are dealt with in the Crown Court. I think you will struggle to find anyone with any reasonable level of understanding that will say that he committed the worse crime in the world. He didn’t murder anyone. He didn’t rape anyone. Would you say that is crime was worse than murder or rape? 15 minutes ago, pingpong said: I'm not sure that "not as bad as Hitler" is the flex people think it is. Agreed
Farmer Saint Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 44 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: I’m intrigued nic. We all know about Farage’s grifts both old and new but you say that Starmer is making “millions and millions” from being PM. I am sure a man of you huge intellect wouldn’t just make something up, so can you please give us the evidence of these money making schemes that you are so sure that Starmer is involved with? Thanks. (This is one of Farage’s latest for info) https://www.desmog.com/2026/01/07/nigel-farage-reform-uk-accepted-10000-gifts-from-abu-dhabi-uae-petrostate/ Genuine question here. Why do you continue to engage with him? It's fairly easy to see why a number of posters on here continuously wind you up, because you literally cannot let anything go. 1
trousers Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Genuine question here. Why do you continue to engage with him? It's fairly easy to see why a number of posters on here continuously wind you up, because you literally cannot let anything go. Saintsweb would be a very quiet place if no-one took the bait of the obvious WUMs on here... 🙂 1
Farmer Saint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 6 minutes ago, trousers said: Saintsweb would be a very quiet place if no-one took the bait of the obvious WUMs on here... 🙂 But SOG v Nic is so fucking boring. 1
Turkish Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 18 minutes ago, trousers said: Saintsweb would be a very quiet place if no-one took the bait of the obvious WUMs on here... 🙂 There are no WUMs on here, it's all serious talk.
Turkish Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 38 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Genuine question here. Why do you continue to engage with him? It's fairly easy to see why a number of posters on here continuously wind you up, because you literally cannot let anything go. He loves the attention, It's like crack to him. If he wanted to maintain this facade of being a really decent, caring old guy who just wants to the world to be a better place he should post significantly less, because any time he gets engaged he ends up showing his true colours.
iansums Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Genuine question here. Why do you continue to engage with him? It's fairly easy to see why a number of posters on here continuously wind you up, because you literally cannot let anything go. To be fair, it's not just SOG. 1
egg Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, iansums said: To be fair, it's not just SOG. Correct, and nic isn't the only one obsessed with SoG. There are personal skirmishes all over the lounge which seems to dominate pretty much every thread, and follow from thread to thread. The forum is worse for it. Anyways, I'm off to call Ralph a cunt. 4
iansums Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, egg said: Correct, and nic isn't the only one obsessed with SoG. There are personal skirmishes all over the lounge which seems to dominate pretty much every thread, and follow from thread to thread. The forum is worse for it. Anyways, I'm off to call Ralph a cunt. Hold on, I thought that was Whelks role on the forum?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now