The Falkland Islands

[Weston Super Saint]

Maybe time for a new thread since it seems like it might kick off in the South Atlantic again.

Do we have a navy big enough to transport troops or will we be commandering cruise ships again?  Do we have enough planes or will we rely on drones?  

Maybe the burning question is why is David Dickinson the President of Argentina?

[Gloucester Saint]

Just a reminder of Nigel Farage’s and Kemi Badenoch’s view on Milie. The Telegraph also said we needed a British Milie. Hmmmm……

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyk18g1l8ko

[Farmer Saint]

45 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Maybe time for a new thread since it seems like it might kick off in the South Atlantic again.

Do we have a navy big enough to transport troops or will we be commandering cruise ships again?  Do we have enough planes or will we rely on drones?  

Maybe the burning question is why is David Dickinson the President of Argentina?

Honestly, I think it's just posturing, but we'll see.

[badgerx16]

We can't defend them against a serious military threat, but Argentina don't present a serious military threat ;

 

[trousers]

1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Maybe time for a new thread since it seems like it might kick off in the South Atlantic again.

Do we have a navy big enough to transport troops or will we be commandering cruise ships again?  Do we have enough planes or will we rely on drones?  

Maybe the burning question is why is David Dickinson the President of Argentina?

Looks more like Harry Enfield to me... 🙂

[badgerx16]

Donnie says that because we didn't help with Iran, ( help he said the US didn't need ), the US is reconsidering it's position on the Falklands and might well side with his BFF Milei.

[Sheaf Saint]

2 hours ago, trousers said:

Looks more like Harry Enfield to me... 🙂

That's what I was thinking.

"ONLY ME-lei"!

[Holmes_and_Watson]

A flotilla of mega dinghies, hired from people smugglers, makes it's brave way to the Falklands, to repel the invaders.

[AlexLaw76]

Deter the Argies, possibly. Even this ability is growing insignificant

Retake them if needed - absolutely no chance what so ever.

We are done as a serious conventional military force. As said for the last few years, against a peer/near peer advisory we would be done and dusted over a bad weekend.

Edited 6 hours ago by AlexLaw76

[a1ex2001]

31 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Deter the Argies, possibly. Even this ability is growing insignificant

Retake them if needed - absolutely no chance what so ever.

We are done as a serious conventional military force. As said for the last few years, against a peer/near peer advisory we would be done and dusted over a bad weekend.

Fortunately Argentina are nothing like a near peer they in effect have no Navy with which to take the islands and no air force to ealistically threaten the on station Typhoons.  It is as always just posturing from an Argentine president because there is trouble at home the classic right wing distraction/othering solution to hide the real problems!

[tdmickey3]

50 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Deter the Argies, possibly. Even this ability is growing insignificant

Retake them if needed - absolutely no chance what so ever.

We are done as a serious conventional military force. As said for the last few years, against a peer/near peer advisory we would be done and dusted over a bad weekend.

Yeo, we can thank the Tories for hollowing it out over their 14 years term and surely just laugh at the posturing Badenoch blabbing about increasing it by 10bn....🤣

[Disco Stu]

3 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

We can't defend them against a serious military threat, but Argentina don't present a serious military threat ;

 

Mark Felton videos are full of misinformation, plagiarism and sensationalism.

Edited 5 hours ago by Disco Stu

[Disco Stu]

Argentina are vastly weaker militarily compared to 1982. They've weakened themselves more than we have. Our garrisoned forces on the islands are already capable of repelling them. We have 1500 troops on the islands and it's been said by military experts that it would take 3 typhoon jets to gain air superiority. We currently have 4 typhoon jets on the island. There could be no surprise attack like in 1982 either. We'd see them coming days in advance with modern surveillance technology.

Edited 5 hours ago by Disco Stu

[AlexLaw76]

58 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Yeo, we can thank the Tories for hollowing it out over their 14 years term and surely just laugh at the posturing Badenoch blabbing about increasing it by 10bn....🤣

Bless, you think this is just the fault of the Tories over just 14 years...

[Challenger]

4 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Donnie says that because we didn't help with Iran, ( help he said the US didn't need ), the US is reconsidering it's position on the Falklands and might well side with his BFF Milei.

There's very little point trying to keep on this arsehole's good side. Time the UK reconsiders it's position on letting the US use our military bases if that's the way he wants to go.

 

[tdmickey3]

2 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Bless, you think this is just the fault of the Tories over just 14 years...

Bless, you trying to defend the Tories..

 

[egg]

2 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Bless, you trying to defend the Tories..

 

I think his point is that the damage was done well before they damaged it more. Valid to be fair. 

[tdmickey3]

Just now, egg said:

I think his point is that the damage was done well before they damaged it more. Valid to be fair. 

Maybe but i also pointed out the Badenoch blather after making zero attempts to rectify it in those 14 years 

[egg]

4 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Maybe but i also pointed out the Badenoch blather after making zero attempts to rectify it in those 14 years 

They've all kicked it down the road until Trump gave them a rocket. There's not one party to blame for this. There's been years of complacency and underfunding. 

[moonraker]

53 minutes ago, Disco Stu said:

Mark Felton videos are full of misinformation, plagiarism and sensationalism.

Agree, he has produced some truly lamentable videos.  Inaccuracies, bare faced lies and twisted facts.

 

42 minutes ago, Disco Stu said:

Argentina are vastly weaker militarily compared to 1982. They've weakened themselves more than we have. Our garrisoned forces on the islands are already capable of repelling them. We have 1500 troops on the islands and it's been said by military experts that it would take 3 typhoon jets to gain air superiority. We currently have 4 typhoon jets on the island. There could be no surprise attack like in 1982 either. We'd see them coming days in advance with modern surveillance technology.

Correct, in 1982 we had circa 40 Royal Marines on the islands, no air assets, an unarmed ice patrol ship and no facilities to reinforce by air.  All that has changed, with circa 1500 service personnel now stationed there.  The current order of battle and operational state of the Argentinian Navy is woeful at best 2 Frigates and 2 patrol ships, no submarines, no amphibious capabilty and no organic fixed wing air.  The air bridge to The Falklands via Ascension is fully established and operational. The Argentinian Air Force only currently has 6 operational fixed wing combat jets! The RAF have the capacity to deliver a battalion sized force, most likely drawn from 16 Air Assault Brigade, with artillery and air assets to the Falklands very quickly.   

[moonraker]

25 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Bless, you think this is just the fault of the Tories over just 14 years...

Yes and Majors huge cuts in the nineties. Remember John Knott, if the Argentinians had waited until 1983/84 we would not have been able to retake the Falklands his proposed massive cuts to the Navy, supported by Thatcher, would have ended all fixed wing aviation and amphibious capability. The Falklands saved Thatcher but consigned Knott to a foot note of history. 

[Willo of Whiteley]

6 hours ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Maybe time for a new thread since it seems like it might kick off in the South Atlantic again.

Do we have a navy big enough to transport troops or will we be commandering cruise ships again?  Do we have enough planes or will we rely on drones?  

Maybe the burning question is why is David Dickinson the President of Argentina?

Can't unsee Harry Enfield 😂

[AlexLaw76]

27 minutes ago, moonraker said:

Yes and Majors huge cuts in the nineties. Remember John Knott, if the Argentinians had waited until 1983/84 we would not have been able to retake the Falklands his proposed massive cuts to the Navy, supported by Thatcher, would have ended all fixed wing aviation and amphibious capability. The Falklands saved Thatcher but consigned Knott to a foot note of history. 

A lens into the state of the RN today.

See you ignored the Blair years in your critique 

[tdmickey3]

10 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

A lens into the state of the RN today.

See you ignored the Blair years in your critique 

Is this from X 

[badgerx16]

2 hours ago, Disco Stu said:

Mark Felton videos are full of misinformation, plagiarism and sensationalism.

His stuff on WW2 may be suspect, but is that video wrong ?

[egg]

12 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Is this from X 

Why does it matter where it's from if it's correct? 

[tdmickey3]

9 minutes ago, egg said:

Why does it matter where it's from if it's correct? 

It may be correct but X is not really credible is it?

[egg]

21 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

It may be correct but X is not really credible is it?

The forum and facts are different issues mate. My understanding though is that his post was accurate. His source is immaterial. 

[moonraker]

1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

A lens into the state of the RN today.

See you ignored the Blair years in your critique 

Fair point if you only count frigates, ill include the 6 T45s and 2 aircraft carriers, 5 SSNs, 3 OPVs and 2 Hydrographic Ships during Blairs tenure.  Both Labour and the Tories have been guilty of failing the armed forces and the defence of the realm.  

 

Edited 3 hours ago by moonraker

[AlexLaw76]

4 minutes ago, moonraker said:

Fair point if you only count frigates, ill include the 6 T45s during Blairs and 2 aircraft carriers, 5 SSNs, 3 OPVs and 2 Hydrographic Ships

you mean the T45s that were originally 12 in number, then 8, then to 6........

[Turkish]

38 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

It may be correct but X is not really credible is it?

You do know X is a platform not a source of information? 

[tdmickey3]

1 minute ago, Turkish said:

You do know X is a platform not a source of information? 

Yes, but people seem to take its posts as facts

[moonraker]

Somewhat like the reduction of 23s from an initial requirement for 32 down to 16.

 

[Turkish]

1 minute ago, tdmickey3 said:

Yes, but people seem to take its posts as facts

"IT" doesnt post anything it's the people on the platform who post. 

[tdmickey3]

15 minutes ago, Turkish said:

"IT" doesnt post anything it's the people on the platform who post. 

Top bantz bro

[AlexLaw76]

19 minutes ago, moonraker said:

Somewhat like the reduction of 23s from an initial requirement for 32 down to 16.

 

and Labour quickly made that 13 in the early 00s

 

[tdmickey3]

Just now, AlexLaw76 said:

and Labour quickly made that 13 in the early 00s

 

Don`t fret Kimi is going to spend spend spend...... 

[Gloucester Saint]

7 hours ago, trousers said:

Looks more like Harry Enfield to me... 🙂

You don’t wanna invade it like that…

[Disco Stu]

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

His stuff on WW2 may be suspect, but is that video wrong ?

To be fair, I haven't watched that specific video. It was more of a warning that he isn't a credible source of information.

I watched several of his videos in the past and always found them sensationalistic but stopped after he was called out on several occasions for getting his facts wrong. I no longer like giving him views after he was outed as a serial plagiariser.