Stud mark of doom

Whoops- silly me, I meant 2076 1 May

2067 - 1 May

This will definitely change by the end of next season.

It is actually very good. Much better than last nights effort.

That's how I remember it - a split second whilst everyone thought "did that really just happen?" And the delirium.

No time to discuss Spurs punched in opener either.

Second to last on. Just between the two nil nil draws. Licensed to thrill.

20 for me - and several where I thought "that's a ridiculously obscure one, oh hang on I do recognise him, sadly".

http://sportsworld.nbcsports.com/jose-fonte-early-days-stardom/?utm_network=twitter&utm_post=3616310&utm_source=TW%20%40NBCSportsSoccer&utm_tags=srm%5Bsoccer%2Clong%20form%5D

Toby or not Toby. That is the question.

77/78 - runners up div 2 78/79 - 14th div 1 79/80 - 8th div 1 80/81 - 6th div 1 11/12 - runners up div 2 12/13 - 14th div 1 13/14 - 8th div 1 14/15 - 6th div 1 (so far)

I don't remember us really having a good shot at the title in 83/84. Here's the table one month before the end: http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/division-one-old/1983-1984/table/1984-04-21 11 points off the top (albeit with 2 games in hand). I think the season when I really thought we might do it was a couple of years before that with Keegan in the team. Early February was probably when things looked most rosy: http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/division-one-old/1981-1982/table/1982-02-06

http://youtu.be/2ca9PN_uBXc Airbrushed from history

This is almost as stupid a suggestion as liverpool being in for Lambo.

What is the highest attendance in the fa cup sponsored by Budweiser final I wonder?

We can still get fourth - COYR

Does this include shoot outs? We haven't done too bad in those - from memory Millwall at the dell won scoring all 5? Man Utd circa 92 ditto but only needed 4 Jpt v Norwich won - maybe missed one out of 5? Derby ...... Missed 2 of 6

Doesn't Boruc have a release clause?

The Spanish southampton

Good report, including reference to a great JPT song http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/11473250/Chelsea-1-Southampton-1-Premier-League-match-report-Mourinhos-side-held-by-outstanding-visitors.html

Sorry, to clarify, I meant similar in terms of having gone to rack and ruin. Obviously I was not intending to associate the word "big" with them. That would be ridiculous. Apologies for the offence this has caused.

This chap should think about it like buying a house. Saints are a lovely big detached house - very good state of repair, high spec fittings, all done recently. Debate able if planning permission to extend would be granted. Villa and Everton and older bigger places but they are a bit dilapidated. The electrics need updating. The heating looks a bit dodgy. They have been owned by an old person who has just gone into a home. Leeds is a real big old place. No-one has lived there for about 10 years. It has gone to rack a ruin because of a dispute over a Will. The roof if fooked. Or Pompey - similar to Leeds but also built on a cliff top which is falling into the sea.

Burnley away? Still very good

When Liverpool were good -

I recall a letter to When Saturday Comes on this very topic some years ago. If I remember it went on to suggest alternative levels of penalty certainty using property boundaries of different strength. It's very rare for a team to get through a home game without at least 1 or 2 "garden fencers" for example.