Well even though the headline says the flag is a good idea the article ends with
"I am not against a tribute to Markus Liebherr, I am all for it, but I am for something permanent, not a flag that will have a short shelf life and in a season or so will be tatty and perhaps stuck in a shed somewhere, is that a fitting tribute for Markus ?"
Ending the article with "is that a fitting tribute for Markus?" comes across as a dig.
I just have an issue with people who feel the need to be negative about things like this, where others are putting their own time into sorting something which has clearly captured peoples attention.