Wade Garrett

Why, you were 5mph over the limit. Does the law not apply to you?

The questions on that poll were garbage. To vote against Adkins, you had to think that all of the clubs problems were down to him. It is no more than I expect from that toilet paper.

He has been our best and most effective player this season, ahead of Morgan.

I think your trying to find things that aren't there in his clear statements. Perhaps :-)

Some of this sh*t is getting so ridiculous that you wonder if the dark arts of PR aren't at work again.

Why would he say that he was being true to himself and happy if he didn't believe in what he was doing. I don't think he is happy with how the season is going, rather he is happy with how he is doing his job.

He said 'Be true to yourself, I'm happy'. I reckon that blows the theory of him doing the job with one hand tied behind his back to rest.

The most sought after swapsie was David McCreery, Northern Ireland, World Cup '82. Got it to finish the book, and gave someone all of my swaps (must have been at last 50). I must add again, I have no UEFA coaching badges.

Trouble with doubling up on players is that it leaves time and space for others. I don't think doubling up on Bale will achieve much anyway. I played the game at a decent standard but have no interest in coaching. I do not have any UEFA badges, but I did have the silver England Panini sticker badge in the World Cup '82 book.

Welcome to the world of golf. All you need now is a diamond jumper!

Careful, you'll be accused of being a bedwetter, or part of the 'iphone 5 generation' who obviously has no recollection of our history.

I reckon it would me of a natural 4-3-3 with Cork playing alongside Davis and Morgan, with Lallana, Lambert and Ramirez playing in front of them.

Are you sure this isn't just blind faith in Adkins. If prozone stats are that important, then Matty would have been luck to have played 50 games for us! When we have the ball in their box, there is no better player in our side than Ricky. Why don't you think we don't struggle up front when he doesn't play? Have we scored that many without him?

'Be true to yourself, I'm happy'. Perhaps this comment of his puts to rest the ludicrous idea that he doesn't pick the side or choose tactics.

I agree about Jay, I think he's going to be a decent player. But Lambert should start every game that he is fit for.

Colin, are you suggesting we drop our best players if the opposition are tactically aware of him? Not sure I agree with that one.

I respect the right for you to have an opinion, but this is garbage, absolute garbage. He's the most dangerous forward we have by a mile, and his work rate is beyond question. He is everywhere to help the team.

Your opinion, fair enough. My opinion is that he did a fantastic job at Spurs.

He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. His words on here would only get twisted anyway.

I don't mind a chairman who keeps his mouth shut. Never did the likes of Woodford much harm. Contrast that with rent-a-gobs like Dave Whelan. The Daily Echo are their own worst enemy. Really dumbed down now, can't remember the last time I bought it. I hardly even go on their website.

He took a failing squad and turned them around. He shipped players out for decent money and bought players in that were good enough to finish 4th in the league on more than one occasion. I wouldn't mind a few players of that 'quality' if it had a similar effect on us. Face facts, he did an excellent job at Spurs.

It has everything to do with it! He got £20m for Keane for a start, Crouch didn't go for exactly f*ck all either. Personally, I don't want Redknapp here, but objectivity is going out of the window with this thread.

Not saying I want Redknapp here, but the point you're trying to make here is a load of crap. A lot of the cost was offset by player sales which you fail to mention. Redknapp was working under a chairman every bit as ruthless and savvy as Cortese in Daniel Levy. The fact is, Redknapp took a failing team, who were in a poor position at the time and going nowhere, and turned them around.

It looks like Adkins only sees Lambert as a squad player now, so why not? Does look like bullsh*t though.

His job isn't untenable. All this stuff about influences from Reed and Cortese about who he picks and how he plays, is, in my opinion a load of rubbish. I do think another manager could get more from our squad. I can't see where our next win is coming from. But I would be delighted to be proved wrong. If he loses the dressing room though, then his job becomes impossible, not untenable. Think of AVB last season.