Lord Duckhunter

Wrong thread

Fucking hell he’s boring….

It’s hardly Big Mal & his fedora. Mind you, if Ralph let a soft porn star into the team bath, it might be the making of some of our boys. Although with our wokies in charge, he’d have his P45 before she’d dried her hair.

How could we, you don’t shut up about it.

Stuff like this that makes us look like a right noddy club.

I’m disappointed. I’ve come on here to see what Steve Bray & Adonis have tweeted this afternoon & Warrior has let me down.

Correct. Nobody thought we were anywhere near certain to get promoted from the Championship , most thought play offs would be a decent return. It’s only with hindsight that people realised what a really good side that was. I don’t think many thought Ricky lambert capable of playing for England when we got out of league 1, or thought 5 or 6 of that squad would prosper in the top flight. Nigel must be given credit for helping develop those players into top professionals, and putting them into a system that brought the best out of them.

Complete and utter pony. Laughable made up pony.

Well that’s complete pony. Tony Book never played a professional game till he was in his 30’s, played for Bath City. He went on to win The old first division, the European cup winners cup, the FA cup, League cup and was footballer of the year. Not saying Jack will do any of that but to claim a centre half is “what you’re going to get” at 28 is rubbish.

Yes, credit where it’s due. We seem set up a bit better defensively, giving him a little more protection. His previous best spell was under Puel, who had a defensive structure that brought the best out of him. He also doesn’t seem quite so causal with the ball or in his marking this season. His jumping still worries me, maybe he needs to bulk up a bit, but fingers crossed he’s reaching an age where his experience will make him a better player. Everybody makes mistakes, but the best players make less and make different ones. Making the same mistakes over and over will kill you at this level. IF, he plays out the season the way he’s started it, and it’s a big if, I can see him skippering the side next.

It’s only seems to be cricket & football where they don’t put “women” before the event. The tennis is “The women’s final”, athletics is “The women’s 100 meters”. They jumped the shark when they did a programme celebrating 70 years of TMS , and what did they start it with. Don Bradman, Botham’s ashes, The West Indies “grovel” series, Shane Warnes first ball? No, England birds winning the “World Cup”. These Wokies are deranged. My mum knows more about cricket than most blokes (the result of Grandad not having a son), and she couldn’t care less about the chick game. Nobody does, they’re minority sports over promoted and hitched to the back of the men’s game. It’s actually condescending and against every thing women’s liberation was meant to be about.

Im going to add to the debate by posting Twitter post after Twitter post, over & over again.

Fucking Hell. Can’t the mods start a thread, “Warrior does Twitter”. What a frigging bore.

I thought the bloke was going to be a really decent player, but he never trained on from his good start in the side. It’s too early to say whether he’s finally learning from his mistakes and developing into a proper centre half, but he’s started the season well. IF he continues in this vein for the whole season , then it’s going to be a real bonus to the club. Fair play to Ralph, others would have ditched him by now.

The supposedly highly intelligent Remain brains turned out to be a bunch of complete fuckwits. Amazing isn’t it, a complete and utter shitstorm from the great and the good. Time after time the “thick” leavers ran rings round them. Nigel managed to out smart them despite not winning a single seat (save a couple of sitting defections). And we’re supposed to listen to these chumps? From the day Cameron pretended he wanted a vote (safe in the knowledge The Lib Dem’s would veto it in the next coalition/hung Parliament) they fucked up. The sham “renegotiation”, the campaign which seemed based on a “Europe is bad, but leaving is worse” strategy. Not accepting Mrs Mays turd. Then unbelievably giving the Boris the election he wanted, in the misguided belief people actually didn’t want Brexit. These people couldn’t run a bath, and they’re the “clever” ones. Lol. Bunch of fucking helmets.

No it didn’t, we have the Remain dominated Parliament to thank for that.

The old Ken Clarke solution. Can’t win the vote, don’t have one. The people’s representatives set the rules for the vote, they could have insisted on anything & were remain dominant. The reason they allowed a vote & a straight 50% + 1. Was simple, they thought they’d win it and put Nigel back in his box. As Anna Subry later cried “ I wouldn’t have voted for a referendum if I’d known we’d lose”. Who cares about democracy, the EU love in trumps that.

Why don’t they just allow blokes to go in goal? If it makes the game more popular that’s a more practical suggestion than tight fitting kit.

He has. The trap that the UK Euro fanatics did for years, particularly perfected by Little Johnie Major & Call me Dave. Trying to con the electorate into thinking they’re not a raging federalist. Cameron did it for years, how many times did he make out he was pulling out of the ECHR, safe in the knowledge he wouldn’t, but that voters would consider him Euro sceptic. It’s all about perception, but ends up eroding support for The EU

Absolutely unbelievable.

I’m not a Tory, I’ve voted for them for specific reasons, but I’ve no love for the band of pinkos that call themselves Tories these days. I’m a small state conservative and as such oppose this measure. You can’t want a smaller state, until it comes to protecting your own money and you suddenly want a bigger state. I’m against this despite being a beneficiary of it. Morally, it’s wrong, it also won’t work. Until there’s a radical reform of the NHS & Social care nothing will change

This is not about funding social care, it’s already funded. Not a penny more will go into social care, this is about replacing private funding with public money. If this was about giving people decent care and dignity, and not having to live in shit conditions with minimum wage people caring for them, I’d be all for it. It’s not,. The manifesto pledge to “sort social care” didn’t mean making it better or radically changing it, it meant ensuring people could pass more inheritance onto their kids. Paid for my everyone else.

What a load of old pony

Fucking hell, we’re becoming a right Noddy club

Only it’s not a tax to “fund” social care. It’s a tax that transfers the cost of social care from relatively well off individuals, to the state. The poor already have their social care paid for.