MarkSFC
Subscribed Users-
Posts
2,290 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by MarkSFC
-
I will admit that he's not been a favourite of mine and I still doubt that over a season he will be "as good as or better than we could hope for" in The Championship....but on Monday he was very good, the best I've seen of him!
-
When we go up will we need a striker better than we have? Yes Is BT better than we have? On current form, No. On his best form, without doubt. Will he get back to his best form? Who can tell Are there better short and long term options available that we can afford? Definitely If we were to sign him I would be happy with that but we had really be going for someone in or just about to be in their prime who can get is to the prem and keep us their. CMS, Danny Graham, Ebanks-Blake possibly, Basically there are better options!
-
69 million over 3 years means 23 million per year divided by 72 clubs equates to just over 300k per season per club. I doubt that its actually split equally but could effect Div 2 clubs enough to hinder them. Maybe this is the start of the meltdown of the structure we have. North and South sections won't be far away at least below Div 1
-
Championship Season - What positions need strengthening?
MarkSFC replied to RobM's topic in The Saints
We should hope for players in these positions that are better than we have; GK Left Back Center Back Center Mid Striker -
Its tantalising! Our max is 95 points which obviously would mean a run of 10 wins, but its possible! To guarantee top spot BHA need 12 points from 7 games. Take our game out and possibly Huddersfield, they have to win 4 out of 5! We just need to keep winning....but for BWPs late goal wed be on a run of 6 already so there is no doubt we are playing well at the right time!
-
Having looked at all fixtures I would be amazed if 18 more points wasn't enough for us and I actually thing 16 will be. Having said that Peterboro shouldn't be totally discounted as they have a run in that looks the best, but due to their far worse defending I doubt they can win 6 or even all 7 but its still on!
-
So many to choose, but I'd have to say these standout most; Saints 4-1 Liverpool 1989 sat on the west benches in front of 2 scousers who just couldn't believe what was happening but were very gracious afterwards. Chelsea 2-4 Saints NYD 2002, after celebrating the night before in London town and only getting two hours sleep the game was great. At half time we were 2-1 down but my mate was telling us it would ok cos we will win 4-2!! Wolves 0-6 Saints. Amazing atmosphere, Saga had his only great game and we drank the night away in Birmingham! Saints 3-1 Newcastle not sure of year but the one thatnwasny a great game but possibly the greatest finish seeing as we were 1 nil down with 90 minutes played! Gotta love Pavel Srnecek or however you spell it! Saints 3-2 arsenal the last "real" game at the Dell. A special atmoshere all day, a great game and a very special moment at the end particularly if you had bet on Matty scoring last and us winning 3-2 at 175-1! A good night ensued!
-
perfect...
-
one of your posts i like!!
-
What a very very sad little man this Meldrum bloke is. Weak, simple, selective, antogonistic and basically lazy journalism written by someone who is clearly a bitter individual. However anyone wants to attempt to partray it Southampton FC is a "relatively" big club in this country. Based on ground capacity which is the most usual indicator of size, we are ranked 17th in all divisions and 2nd in League 1 behind Sheffield Wednesday. Its a total other disussion but because we have only had that size stadium for 10 years I wonder how different our past would have been on hte field if indeed during the 70's, 80,s, and 90's we had been able to attract 30k+ week in week out?! Anyway, the similar little club down the road has a capacity of just under 10K and cant fill that every week when they are having a great season. And here-in lies the vast difference between the clubs. We, once everyone has played the same number of games are quite likely to be 2nd in the division ahead of Bournemouth, but because they have played more games they currently sit there. Sure they are having a good season but because of our history we do have very much higher exectations and quite rightly so. We also have the fanbase the stadium and we have the money. Those three things are the main ingredieents for success in football.get over it Bournemouth. This Cup Final tomorrow is not one for any normal level headed Saints fan. Its merely a game against a team who just happen to be above us at the moment. Its important because they currently have more points despite the games played, and whoever we were playing in the same situation, it would matter that we win. Bournemouth are not our football rivals on a daily, yearly, lifetime basis....Portsmouth are, and that will never change. We are Bournemouths closest Football League team so they obviously feel like we should be. WE ARE NOT!!! Journalists like Meldrum are a disgrace to their profession.If he really does class hmself as a Saints fan then he should really hang his head in shame. Anyway it will probably be a draw tomorrow...!!
-
At The Dell you couldn't buy alcohol inside the ground. If you wanted a hot drink or a pie you had the kiosks, and if you wanted anything else you had cinema stylee sellers walking round. And before all seats you had to get in the ground early to get "your spot". In modern grounds you have your reserved seat and you have sufficient food and drink choice. The trouble is that if you want any of these items the queue is always too long so you either have to miss a few minutes of the duesyngalf or the start of th second. There are of course TVs on the concourse which helps. Me and my mates normally take it in turn to get the beers at half time and never leave before 40 mins (unless its that bad!). As for what's important mostly the football the result, or the matchday experience they go hand in hand. If we lose everything else helps to ease the pain. If we win everything else is a bonus.
-
If you could say just one word to any Saints player past or present?
MarkSFC replied to Deppo's topic in The Saints
Bridge-return -
Oh look, that mature debating tact of reverting to personal comments when you actually run out of anthing intelligent to say. Well done,
-
If leading Div 1 is a 'rise' for BHA that sums it all up that the 'normal' order of things is completely out of sync right now.
-
Just my instinct Turkish based on various things but also from things I hear from my brothe who works with a load of Brighton fans. Don't really care either way though, they're not important!
-
Actually depends what you regard as regularly. In the Prem and indeed div 1 pre Prem era we sold out virtually every game for decades. In League 1 we have regularly sold out once or twice a season! However you try to put it we average ove 21k which is the best in the league and higher than some Prem teams and most NPC teams. If we were both in the Prem I'm sure we wotld sell out but you won't and anyway we wotld have 8-10k more every game. Get real.
-
Our only Football rivals are The Skates. Bournemouth, Brighton and anyone else you care to mention only become rivals when we happen to be in the same division which over the last 125 years has been very few seasons because they have been lower down the pyramid. Simples!
-
Size of club is essentially based on capacity and attendance so by a long way we are the biggest on the South coast, indeed we are the biggest outside London and south of Birmingham. But of course in any given season a smaller club can be higher ranked. Generalle attendance levels and size of customer base determines income and loosely potential to succeed. For these reasons I have no doubt that we will always be bigger than Pompey, Brighton Bournemouth, Reading etc etc. Small clubs will have their days and Brighton and Bournemouth are having theirs right now. Bournemouth are just about at their limit whereas Brighton will potentially be conpetitive in the NPC. Potentially a yo-yo club between Prem and NPC IF they can fill their ground regularly. But I doubt they will.
-
Question for the Positive-Thinkers after the Walsall result
MarkSFC replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Saints
At this moment in time Bournemouth do "deserve" to be 2nd because they have more points, its very simple. Once everyone has played 46 games it will all brcome much clearer who deserved what. I think its quite clear that the majority our players are amongst the best in the league. What's more apparent is that as a team and as individuals they have been less consistant than the leaders. Consistancy of performance is almost always a mental thing especially when comparing like for like. Poyet seems to have got both the physical and mental right within his squad who on thenwhole haven't been in their position before. Bournemouth though have already been there and done that last season so the "pressure" is easier for m to handle due to both lower expectations from fans and by the knowledge within themselves that they can do it. Within our squad I don't think the cast majority have ever been promoted, and so couple thatnwith the expectation factor and you get the "inconsistency" like Tuesday. This is not an excuse though, merely a potential reason as I see it. Having ability and also the drive and capacity to be successful do not go hand in hand automatically. I hope I'm wrong but I wonder whether some of our players have whatnut takes to be success in our environment. But its after 46 games that counts. -
The difference between Southampton and bournemouth.....
MarkSFC replied to BHA's topic in The Saints
come back in 3 years...5 years.....10 years.......c*** -
Very good post! Sums up my ramblings very well, thanks!
-
I think you maybe the one who does not have a clue. Man U is completely run the way it is because it is the biggest brand in football based on its history. If Saints are run based on its history then there is a very small potential for development.
-
you misunderstand. c'est la vie.
-
It was ainforever who used the word......
-
Without the stats this is mere supposition but under PArdew I laways got the impression that we started very well in the first half and tailed off. Almost like we would use too much energy and sometimes run out. Under Adkins it feels like he has the team pacing themselves better, and saving energy for the latter part of games. I also heard that Adkins has a very set routine at half-time (dont know if PArdew implemented it, doubt it though!!) whereby the first 5 minutes are a quiet time...allowing everyone to reflect and clam down....then Adkins spends 5 minutes de-briefing the first half and then the last 5 minutes are setting expectations and plans for the 2nd half.
