OldNick

I was alluding to Claude not Ralph

I remember the atmosphere in the first leg of the league cup being electric. The difference I believe is that nowthe fans seem to have taken to Ralph and not worried about his lack of good English in interviews etc. it is good to have a pretty united fanbase

Am I right thinking that the fanbase in the main is the most united since Koemans arrival??

Im sure Brexit is the reason, but I suspect we will see massive cuts in motor car employment due to the onset of new electric technology for cars.A client of mine was invited to a Mercedes factory and was told that few if any of the models on show now will be in the showrooms in 2 years time, due to the new electric cars coming forward. Of course few engine parts will be needed and so the workforce will be reduced.

Whilst he feels its not his fault, he must have known he was doing wrong and so why is he now expecting sympathy?

So something costing more is not a negative lol and you say Im the moron

well the performance against Spurs was pretty decent with Kelvin in charge, much better than the Cardiff game

The EU will give us nothing as they know that the chances of a second referendum increase by the day.

Its a true story, but another niggle we have to go through. Much like the visa for the US , its there and we have to pay it. It is just another new thing that will cost us, but as you say its only £7 but a family of 4 its £28

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/revealed-how-much-it-will-cost-to-travel-to-the-eu-after-brexit/ar-BBQWlka?ocid=spartanntp

FFS do you have to take every sentence literally? Of course no deal will ever suit 100% of the people but it should suit more that 52%

Lol

LD this is not a normal situation or GE it is something that has ramifications for generations. The selfish ,'we have won and so stuff everyone else' is an appalling position to take. Especially when most of our people had no idea really what they were voting for. The deal should be for us all, not the 4% extra who made the difference.

Thank-you for your reply. Personally I believe she went with her hands tied as the terms we signed up to all those years ago were to totally screw anyone who wished to leave. Hence what is happening now. In some ways I feel we should go for the nuclear option and do the no deal, as that would immediately focus the EU's minds. They know we are fearful of it, but Im sure privately they are as well. Ireland are playing the billy big balls, but if we do the no deal they are really shafted. I voted to stay in as I did read the terms we were going out on and could see we were shafted.The deal has to be for all the people not just the 52% , this is something Rees Mugg and his crew dont seem to grasp

Lol Mike

Wes I have always voted Tory, but Im ashamed of so many of them at this time. They are not acting on anything but their own political agendas. As for UKIP never have I seen a worse bunch of fools in my life. Labour are no better, they are playing politics instead of the countries interest

Are you advocating a no deal ? If not what are you expecting? Before you answer please read at the terms we signed up to when we joined. Once you have read that you will see that the only option is take the deal on offer with a few tweaks or no deal. Unless of course you feel we can renege on our word. Whether we should have signed that is another thing but that is the position we are in period. It is a dire situation and May has her hands tied

only for half the season did he have VVD

Can somebody please tell us what deal is going to suit democracy in this country and all the nations people? You all seem to be showing who can pee the furthest but please tell who or anyone who has come up with anything close to suit all. That is what May has to deal with

interesting you had to adapt the spelling to get through your sites swear filter Lol. So somebody thinks so and as I told John Bailey on another podcast, to listen to the broadcast at the breakfast table or even at my business it is not always good to have swearing going on as in ******** etc. I swear with the best of us but there does need to be some red lines

we will see.

Any "acceptable settlement" ( The Falklands: 30 years on, 31 March) will recognise that the islands belong to Argentina, by virtue of the principle of uti possidetis juris.Following the British appropriation of Port Egmont in 1765, a Spanish military governor was appointed in 1767 to administer the islands. In 1776, by royal charter, the Spanish crown made the islands a commandery under the jurisdiction of the naval base at Montevideo, which reported to the government of Buenos Aires. Upon the May revolution in 1810, the latter took over all the territories of the viceroyalty of the Rio Plata, including the islands. Spanish administration of the islands was interrupted in 1811 and resumed in 1820. On 10 June 1829, decrees from Buenos Aires created the political and military commandery of the Malvinas islands and islands adjoining Cape Horn in the Atlantic Sea, under the commandership of Luis Vernet. The Argentinian administration was forcefully ended on 3 January 1833, by the arrival of HMS Clio. The above principle, as applied to territorial ownership and as affirmed repeatedly by the international court of justice, accords pre-eminence to legal title over effective possession as a basis of sovereignty. So the islanders have the security of Mount Pleasant defence but not of international law.

Does anyone have the win ratio of the Dell compared to St Marys. I suspect the intimidating atmpsphere ofthe Dell would make it higher.

I think it is a bit of a debate. According to some in international law it should belong to Argentina.

are you looking in the mirror