Weston Saint

So someone with coaching badges gives his views without being rude to any poster and you write this! Shame on you. Give an opinion on the points raised by all means but no need to have a go at the poster for holding valid views. Thought you were better than that.

Let us get this into context. Mitchell contacted Saints to ask if children were allowed in the boardroom. He was told a decision had not been made yet but that he was unwelcome in the boardroom. It is understood that this relates to Mr Mitchell's comments in public that Howe had been offerred the Saints job and had turned it down. Solent say Mr Mitchells comment regarding the job offer were unfounded. Mr Mitchell says he was telling the truth from what he was told! There was a bar bill unpaid until last week for £300 relating to Champagne at the cup game earlier this season but I think that is a side issue. Mr Mitchell was not banned, just unwelcome. He has now purchased a box for the day. Storm in a teacup caused by a mouthy Mitchell. Enough said.

Do they? How do you know? leftback is just one opinion. I would like to hear from him on other subjects from within without the prejudice slant otherwise it will come over as a poster with an agenda.

The problem with left back's posts are that they are so anti Cortese with a passion that it is easy to just brush them aside. However, although this is the ranting & ravings (that's how it comes across to me) it is clear that this information is coming from within the club and I for one am taking it cautiously on board. I hope Mr Cortese reads the posts or at least they are drawn to his attention, not to carry out a witch hunt but to give him feedback and food for thought. I would be interested to know what left back thinks of Mr Adkins in the short time he has been with the club and how his relationship is developing with Cortese and the Reed camp.

This is what he said a few minutes ago Good morning peoples , on my way to melwood for breakfast then flying to utrect wish me and the team a safe flight! 2 minutes ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

I did not see the game but went off to bed last night very disappointed with the result especially as we had taken the lead. However this morning having read Chap in the Chapel posts, a posters view I respect, and then reading Adkins after match comments I feel a little more confident that we will get it right soon. Adkins pulled no punches and identified our problems with ease. We need to pass the ball, we need to keep possession, we need to get width and we need to get quality balls in. These are fundamental issues and easily put right with the quality of players we have. A good insight into what he thinks of Guly as well. Using Adkins words “........he's got to realise as well it's not just what you do when you've got the football, you've got to work hard as well. He'll learn that coming into English football but he has quality.” “It's going to be very difficult for him - he doesn't know the language, he's come to a different country, a different environment and it would be hard for anybody to settle in and we need to allow him the time to do that. He's obviously a quality player with where he's come from and we've got to allow him that time.” We have the right Manager and a decent squad. It just needs a little more time and a couple of loan signings until the transfer window opens. If Adkins can get the team playing the way he wants I am going to enjoy the football and not worry too much about the end of season just yet. Bournemouth on Saturday will now be a very interesting game.

Inheritance Law Under Swiss law, descendants, parents and spouses are statutory heirs. In absence of a will or inheritance contract, in principle the following applies: The surviving spouse gets: a) half of the estate if there are descendants of the deceased, or b) three quarters of the estate if there are no descendants but parental heirs, or c) if there are no parental heirs either, the full estate. Children always inherit in equal shares. Statutory heirs are protected by the mandatory rules on statutory legal portions (also called forced heirship). This means that a person may not dispose of his entire estate at their discretion. Rather, their descendants, surviving parents and spouses are entitled to a portion of the estate by statutory law. The statutory legal portions are based on the aforementioned statutory quotas which the statutory heirs will get if a person dies intestate. Descendants are entitled to three quarters of their statutory quota, and surviving parents and spouses each to one half of their respective statutory quota. It is important to note that under Swiss law, the heirs acquire all assets and all liabilities of the deceased at the moment of death. The heirs form a simple partnership (Communauté héréditaire/Erbengemeinschaft) until the estate has been divided according to the applicable rules. You may dispose of your estate either by will or by inheritance contract. While the will consists of a disposition by the testator only, an inheritance contract is an agreement made by and among the testator and the statutory heirs and/or third persons. Wills: The testator may either choose to: i) write a holograph will (which needs to be entirely handwritten, signed and must include date and place), or ii) obtain a will drawn up and certified by a notary. In case of emergency, an oral will can be made before two witnesses. Wills can be changed at any time. However, you should make sure to state that the new will replaces all prior dispositions made with regard to your estate. Inheritance Contract: By concluding an inheritance contract, the testator may oblige themselves to bequeath their estate or a legacy to the other party (or a third party). It is also possible to conclude an inheritance contract in order to waive an inheritance. Inheritance contracts need to be certified by a notary.

Yes we did.

I know nothing about the new Labour leader but I hear today the majority of the Labour MP's did not vote for him, the majority of the Labour Members did not vote for him. It was the Union vote that got him in. Reports from various past offices he has held say that if he can put off a decision he will! As one person put it "Ed drinks Rose Wine as he cannot make p his mind if he likes Red or White" The Unions will soon ask for pay back time. As a Leader of the opposition that is not dangerous. If he ever became PM this country will have real problems. Well they would if he breaks the habit of a lifetime, allegedly, and makes a decision.

Non contributory final salary pension and retirement at 51 on a pension that means I have no need to work again, just enjoy life, which of course for the last 7 years is exactly what I have been doing.

Fonte dropped down a division becasue he believed Pardew and the team he had put together would get immediate promotion back to the Championship. He looked pretty devistated at the end of the season when that did not happen and with our stuttered start this, perhaps he felt enough was enough...or perhaps it had to do with Pardews dismissal...or perhaps it is pure speculation based on false whispers. He is with us until at least the opening of the next transfer window, is an important part of the team and strategy and I am sure Adkins will be able to show him that this season we will achieve our goal. But, it is all speculation. It might be just as reported, a thigh strain. A 1-0 away win without him should calm a few nerves. Don't knock the poster for putting the rumour up.

The watch story suggests the late Marcus Liebherr was not looking to sell. The sacking and appointing of a new Manager after his death suggests the family are not looking to sell, Cortese's comments on the OS and his subsequent comments at the select 15 supporters dinner suggests the family are not looking to sell, Cortese buying his property in Chilworth in the last few weeks suggests the club is not for sale. There will always be rumours, there will always be those who wish to destable, there are always those who have an axe to grind. I see no evidence of a sale mentality. Dave and Duncan, I think you can sleep easy at this time.

Width of play, players playing in their strongest positions, improved tactics, dead ball variety, ability to use the right subs at the right time and an ability to change tactics/formation (the much vaunted plan B) with a positive outcome. That is the minimum I would expect from any Manager employed by a progressive club.

Is it a small minority?

Any good Manager will assess his resourses, look at the opportunities and threaths, see if he can manage the weaknesses or nuturalise them and only then will he use finances to strengthen if required. He has not had enough time yet but just looking at what he did on Saturday suggests he will be a positive influence and a successful Manager for us.

I think I know why you have asked that question.

It has been a grim start to this years campaign. For what reasons is always open to debate. Was money available to strengthen, did Pardew lose interest, were the team less fit than last season, have the pre and early season injuries hit us harder that then should, is it the loss of pace? Probably a combination of all. I would like to think that with a little time Adkins will get us back to what we were expecting this season and even if automatic promotion fades away I see us being one of the playoff teams and by then a force to be reckoned with. If so we will be back on track with the much vaunted business plan. What are the alternatives for SFC if the Liebherr family sell up? I shudder to think but you can bet we would soon be a club in debt (new owner borrowing against the stadium and facilities) and very little money for players. This is the Liebherr money and I am sure they appreciate they are custodians of the club and have not forgotten the supporters but are trying to establish a decent and balanced business model at a time when football finances is this country are a complete mess. It takes time, there will be issues along the way but we have to give them our support just as many supporters blindly support the club may be we should give Nicola Cortese a bit of space. We are only starting year two of five (or four as some suggest)

The one set of Turnstiles at the Rose Bowl cost circa £800,000

I respect a lot of what you have to say on this forum but believe me I know what I am talking about with Adam. He was fine last season, it started in pre season but until pre Plymouth it was thought it would clear. It was precautionary to give him time to recover before the season started, not a major issue. The operation was a general clear out of the knee as they were in there anyway. The real issue was scar tissue causing a build up of blood and not seen on a scan. The scar tissue has been sorted. As with any player continuing with an injury the body compensates. It is a case of sorting that out as part of the rehabilitation.

Glad to see so many posters appear to know more about this than the medical experts who reviewed pre season, looked at it again after he broke down against Bristol Rovers and operated an hour into the consultation, reported the op was a complete success and no reason why Adam cannot be playing again within 6 - 8 weeks. Yes he is on schedule at present. S-Clarke's information was correct.

If your looking for a creative, challenging and forward thrusting central midfielder look no further than Lallana when he returns fully fit. Schneiderlin as the holding midfielder. Lallana is not a wide left player. It is not his natural position. One of the problems yesterday was Barnard and to a lesser extent Lambert had to go wide to win a ball and pass it too much. That should be our midfield doing that with Barnard and Lambert as the outlet in front of goal.

Not sure if he is still carrying an injury. He does not appear in the treatment room so I assume it is just a fitness and confidence thing now.

After a pretty nondescript first half for both teams we certainly ruled the second. Good pressure and the only thing missing was the finish. No need to press the panic button yet. Signs that Adkins influences on the team are beginning to take effect. Davis playing short balls to defenders to build from the back rather than hoof, a better shape and a heads up second half performance.

Yes I realise the reason but is it right! Pardew was a great exponent of this way also insisting that it was trained into the youngsters. However it is not working. We need to teach players the old fashion getting down to the by line and good accurate crosses behind the defence, not in front of them so they can just head or hoof it out. Put the defence and the keeper under pressure each time a cross comes in. That is my view anyway.

Having reflected for a few days I think the “new manager” syndrome will kick in tomorrow and we will win – predict 2-0. One thing Adkins can do is use some of his sports psychology expertise. He will now have had a chance to assess individual performances and what he sees as their role within the team. He will have got to know the players, their personalities and whilst it might be still too early to assess their strengths/weaknesses and their best role within the team he will have a little more information than he did on Wednesday. I expect the team to run out in a 4-4-2 formation as follows: Davis Butterfield, Fonte, Martin, Harding Chamberlain, Hammond, Schneiderlin, Puncheon Lambert, Barnard I personally do not rate Puncheon. He is a tricky player who works hard but when it comes to the final pass or shot he takes too long in his thinking by which time the players in space are closed down or the defender is on him. However, he is a confidence player and if Adkins can get him in the right frame of mind he might just have one of those games we all crave. An alternative for me would be to drop Chamberlain to the bench put Puncheon on the right with Holmes, assuming fit to start on the left. How novel! Wingers playing on their strongest foot side. Schneiderlin should be told to push forward through the midfield and get out of his comfort zone. Hammond can then concentrate on breaking up and provide front cover for the defence. Or the other way round, both can fill either role. They just need to be more positive and work harder. On the bench will likely be Bialkowski, Seaborne to cover the centre back positions, Wotton to cover central midfield , Dickson to cover the right side, Mills to cover the left side, Chamberlain and Guly as impact players/cover up front. No place for Connolly unless Wotton is taken out of the equation (I wish) and in the event of central midfield issues Fonte comes forward into that spot. Not easy getting the balance right! Who would be a Manager