Donald Trump Appreciation Thread

[skintsaint]

Some brag...

[sadoldgit]

20 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

Some brag...

Did he say why, or wasn’t that important? I suppose they should be thankful that they didn’t just blow it out of the water.

[whelk]

22 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

Some brag...

That’s what he says about his tiny shrivelled mushroom cock and his pissy little baby hands

[badgerx16]

Boasting about the size of something you have stolen. Is the US Navy now playing games with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, "Anything you can seize, we can seize bigger. We can seize snything bigger than you.".

Edited Thursday at 15:05 by badgerx16

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, sadoldgit said:

Did he say why, or wasn’t that important? I suppose they should be thankful that they didn’t just blow it out of the water.

They want it's cargo.

[sadoldgit]

Poor response to Donald in Parliament.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/dec/11/asked-about-the-donalds-national-security-strategy-the-commons-was-remarkable-for-its-absences

 

[Picard]

On 10/12/2025 at 23:06, badgerx16 said:

Now we know why the US Navy has deployed so much hardware to the sea off Venezuela, they are acting as modern day pirates.

 

The tanker was violating sanctions.

[sadoldgit]

Font changed for being woke.🙄

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgkez3367xmo.amp

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, Picard said:

The tanker was violating sanctions.

I know.

[sadoldgit]

4 hours ago, Picard said:

The tanker was violating sanctions.

Sanctions or no sanctions, under International law what the US did = piracy.

[sadoldgit]

Donald in trouble with the law again.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-is-sued-over-white-house-ballroom-construction-3e9098a0?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqfH-gLp0s9XVuG3oloSMWg_KCl5IwFRBRJweTn6I08cR2x6qZ4fk9OXT-Qp7ZY%3D&gaa_ts=693c7f7c&gaa_sig=biQJ5IYCu0n0FdksN2wVpJkwTah6lbJxBxQKxZYAxzW7fuDADCGQg678a5s7cMs0yZ8dvBPDD-gNv12cbsVM6w%3D%3D

[Farmer Saint]

 

Very interesting from Sky News again, they're really good at this sort of analysis.

 

[sadoldgit]

For those who have a problem with the far right label maybe best avoid this article. It comes from the stable of the same people who own the Daily Mail though.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/trump-wants-revolution-in-europe-the-far-right-will-help-him-get-it/ar-AA1Skmxt?cvid=3f69c721694f4dd5b4da9fe88fe6c20e&ocid=hpmsn

[badgerx16]

Donnie shows his class in commenting on the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife;

"The president said that Reiner, a 'once very talented movie director and comedy star,' had passed away 'reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease' known as TDS - or Trump Derangement Syndrome."

[sadoldgit]

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Donnie shows his class in commenting on the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife;

"The president said that Reiner, a 'once very talented movie director and comedy star,' had passed away 'reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease' known as TDS - or Trump Derangement Syndrome."

It’s always about Trump. As ever, no empathy, no class, no self awareness. Barely a day passes when he doesn’t sink to a new low.

[Gloucester Saint]

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Donnie shows his class in commenting on the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife;

"The president said that Reiner, a 'once very talented movie director and comedy star,' had passed away 'reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease' known as TDS - or Trump Derangement Syndrome."

All the charm, grace and diplomacy of an encrusted jizz stain on a headboard. Great advert for the USA.

[31cc]

Edited yesterday at 18:39 by 31cc

[hypochondriac]

1 minute ago, 31cc said:

Yeah that's just a cuntish thing to say really isn't it. 

[Gloucester Saint]

2 minutes ago, 31cc said:

Debate his policies, his impact, the MAGA movement and the motives of the 77m who voted for him.

But just on this type of behaviour alone, he should not be anywhere near such an important leadership position, 

[sadoldgit]

3 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Debate his policies, his impact, the MAGA movement and the motives of the 77m who voted for him.

But just on this type of behaviour alone, he should not be anywhere near such an important leadership position, 

If a CEO of a company had written this they would have been escorted out of the building by security. It’s beyond bizarre that such an appalling human being who demonstrates his unsuitability for such a job daily remains in post.

[benjii]

16 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Debate his policies, his impact, the MAGA movement and the motives of the 77m who voted for him.

But just on this type of behaviour alone, he should not be anywhere near such an important leadership position, 

Indeed, and not just for the sentiment but because he writes like a 12 year old.

Edited yesterday at 18:59 by benjii
Felt "14" was maybe a bit unfair on 14 year olds, so changed it to "12".

[pingpong]

41 minutes ago, benjii said:

Indeed, and not just for the sentiment but because he writes like a 12 year old.

Still too high. By 12 you are in secondary school and would have surpassed trumps reading age already.

My 7 yr old nephew might say something like he did when he is having an episode, so I'd say he writes like a 7yr old having a tantrum.

Correction: I've looked it up. Trumps reading age is 9-10yrs old, so maybe the answer is between the two of us.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/s/WjZJ9NGFZq

Edited yesterday at 19:41 by pingpong
Reading age added.

[rallyboy]

Trump should lose this BBC lawsuit, he is claiming that the BBC showed malice, which is impossible to prove without some very dodgy internal communications.

His ego might have just walked him into an expensive mistake.

[sadoldgit]

1 minute ago, rallyboy said:

Trump should lose this BBC lawsuit, he is claiming that the BBC showed malice, which is impossible to prove without some very dodgy internal communications.

His ego might have just walked him into an expensive mistake.

He also has to prove that it was transmitted by the BBC in Florida which will prove problematic.

[badgerx16]

He also has to prove he suffered financial loss.

[sadoldgit]

12 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

He also has to prove he suffered financial loss.

And find evidence that people changed their voting intention based on what they saw. Given that he won the election he is on very thin ice there too.

It would be great if they invoked the 25th Amendment but then we would end up with Vance as POTUS. Not sure if that would be a huge improvement.

Edited 7 hours ago by sadoldgit
Added text

[Stripey McStripe Shirt]

3 hours ago, rallyboy said:

Trump should lose this BBC lawsuit, he is claiming that the BBC showed malice, which is impossible to prove without some very dodgy internal communications.

His ego might have just walked him into an expensive mistake.

I see he's claiming that the BBC stuff is completely fake, and that he never uttered those words and that it's probably AI. Obviously the BBC edited things in a stupid way, but it's clearly not AI. The worrying thing is though, that I suspect this is a sign of things to come from now on... do anything you want and if it goes badly claim it's AI/fake. Yes, basically the same as what he's always done, but potentially more dangerous now than ever before.

 

[badgerx16]

1 minute ago, Stripey McStripe Shirt said:

I see he's claiming that the BBC stuff is completely fake, and that he never uttered those words and that it's probably AI. Obviously the BBC edited things in a stupid way, but it's clearly not AI. The worrying thing is though, that I suspect this is a sign of things to come from now on... do anything you want and if it goes badly claim it's AI/fake. Yes, basically the same as what he's always done, but potentially more dangerous now than ever before.

 

So is he claiming the entire live TV broadcast of his speech, the tape of which the BBC edited, was a fabrication ?

[badgerx16]

The US is now stalling on the vaunted Tech Prosperity Deal with the UK, which had been announced during Trump's state visit.

Edited 4 hours ago by badgerx16

[Stripey McStripe Shirt]

They put words in his mouth, literally. Apparently. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpvd81470v1o

[sadoldgit]

Fortunately the whole speech was recorded properly and was witnessed at the time.He clearly said the words. No AI involved. 

[badgerx16]

11 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Fortunately the whole speech was recorded properly and was witnessed at the time.He clearly said the words. No AI involved. 

He said all the words, but it was not all the words he said. Or.......,.

"All the right words, not necessarily in the right order".

 

By changing the context they changed the apparent intent.

Edited 3 hours ago by badgerx16

[Holmes_and_Watson]

Beeb sue Donald for a trillion for maliciously saying that their news is AI created, undermining their credibility to operate as a trusted news organisation.

If only.

[whelk]

I hate that this is a story being reported on. All that he craves

[rallyboy]

Every judge that he calls corrupt, every rival politician that he defames and every journalist that he calls stupid should all sue him - ditto any professional news organisation that he calls fake.

He has persistently lied, he could be bankrupted again if a decent lawyer took him on.

 

[sadoldgit]

54 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

He said all the words, but it was not all the words he said. Or.......,.

"All the right words, not necessarily in the right order".

 

By changing the context they changed the apparent intent.

I don’t disagree but he is saying that they put words in his mouth. They didn’t. He spoke every word. There was no AI involved as he claimed.

He also made his intent very clear in his comments during that period. They didn’t need to change anything.

[badgerx16]

10 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

I don’t disagree but he is saying that they put words in his mouth. They didn’t. He spoke every word. There was no AI involved as he claimed.

He also made his intent very clear in his comments during that period. They didn’t need to change anything.

They did not "put words in his mouth" but they did miss out almost all of what he actually said, which did indeed change the perception. When he concluded with "fight" it was in the context of what he had previously been saying about 'fighting' the injustice of a "stolen" election, and encouraging the crowd to persuade Congress to overturn the result.  The perception the BBC presented implied he was precipitating the violence that followed.

Yes, it was likely that a certain amount of unrest might have been anticipated, but Trump did not demand that the Capitol be stormed.

[benjii]

4 hours ago, Stripey McStripe Shirt said:

I see he's claiming that the BBC stuff is completely fake, and that he never uttered those words and that it's probably AI. Obviously the BBC edited things in a stupid way, but it's clearly not AI. The worrying thing is though, that I suspect this is a sign of things to come from now on... do anything you want and if it goes badly claim it's AI/fake. Yes, basically the same as what he's always done, but potentially more dangerous now than ever before.

 

He's cleverly managed to defame the BBC whilst announcing he is trying to sue them for defamation. #genius 

[sadoldgit]

He claims that the BBC has a history of reporting him in a negative manner. The filing says the BBC had no regard for the truth about President Trump and characterises the BBC as making an effort to craft as one sided an impression and narrative against him as possible.

A lot to unpack here but let’s start with what happened to free speech Donald? Then, Trump’s relationship with “the truth” is tenuous at best so good luck with that. The only person responsible for crafting a negative impression of Trump is Trump himself. 

From memory the Panorama programme also featured interviews with some MAGA members who spoke favourably about Trump. Why do that if they weren’t trying to be even handed.

I have seen countless news reports about Trump on the BBC and they have only reported what has happened. Usually what comes out of his mouth is enough to condemn him, he doesn’t need any help in making himself look stupid.

The original speech in this case was around 50 minutes long and was always going to be edited down. He will have to prove that the edit was done with malicious intent. Unless they can produce hard evidence that was the intent, the case might not even make it to court.
 

[AlexLaw76]

2 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

He claims that the BBC has a history of reporting him in a negative manner. The filing says the BBC had no regard for the truth about President Trump and characterises the BBC as making an effort to craft as one sided an impression and narrative against him as possible.

A lot to unpack here but let’s start with what happened to free speech Donald? Then, Trump’s relationship with “the truth” is tenuous at best so good luck with that. The only person responsible for crafting a negative impression of Trump is Trump himself. 

From memory the Panorama programme also featured interviews with some MAGA members who spoke favourably about Trump. Why do that if they weren’t trying to be even handed.

I have seen countless news reports about Trump on the BBC and they have only reported what has happened. Usually what comes out of his mouth is enough to condemn him, he doesn’t need any help in making himself look stupid.

The original speech in this case was around 50 minutes long and was always going to be edited down. He will have to prove that the edit was done with malicious intent. Unless they can produce hard evidence that was the intent, the case might not even make it to court.
 

So much to unpack here…. Just can’t be bothered 

[badgerx16]

11 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

So much to unpack here…. Just can’t be bothered 

BBC edit......

13 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

He claims that the BBC has a history of reporting him.........they weren’t trying to be even handed.