Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
34 minutes ago, whelk said:

Yep, Trousers implying utopia with no costs. Although to be clear was no fan of Corbyn

I don't think many people were (are), him and McDonnell are not particularly nice people.

Policies weren't bad though.

Posted

https://www.yahoo.com/news/albanian-cannot-deported-taunts-home-120225673.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIKBWij3jhgToIjVy4LLozObiA1V8jKKP-bbVFaTFLm6hf1_foLyneiiM4nT8AwdZk4zjBHVyqBwhuD1NCRoLOgtrtT85365jOEiLHq6QasLnkT4it9c1wmL-L2cA3YOS3sVin7JpoK8O9r6IjQGwTSR0JpFKoDLA3Z9l1EGNQ8G
 

Don’t want him here and don’t give a shit what he’s claiming on his asylum application. Cooper has to instruct the Home Office to get him fastracked so he is gone by August and permanent ban from the UK. Albania shouldn’t be a country where asylum applications are considered from anyway.

  • Like 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/albanian-cannot-deported-taunts-home-120225673.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIKBWij3jhgToIjVy4LLozObiA1V8jKKP-bbVFaTFLm6hf1_foLyneiiM4nT8AwdZk4zjBHVyqBwhuD1NCRoLOgtrtT85365jOEiLHq6QasLnkT4it9c1wmL-L2cA3YOS3sVin7JpoK8O9r6IjQGwTSR0JpFKoDLA3Z9l1EGNQ8G
 

Don’t want him here and don’t give a shit what he’s claiming on his asylum application. Cooper has to instruct the Home Office to get him fastracked so he is gone by August and permanent ban from the UK. Albania shouldn’t be a country where asylum applications are considered from anyway.

Exactly this. These are the type of cunts that ruin it for the proper AS.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

The PM just told reporters there is lots of spare housing in local authorities to house illegal immigrants.

really?

Yes really, Ange explains it so eloquently here. 
 

 

Posted
29 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

If we have lots of spare housing in the local community; why are the waiting lists for social housing fucking massive?

Yeah, get the Tories in, they will sort it....... oh wait

Posted
50 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

If we have lots of spare housing in the local community; why are the waiting lists for social housing fucking massive?

Thatcher owns responsibility that one fairly and squarely for not re-distributing a high enough proportion of Right to Buy receipts into new, more modern and efficient social and mixed purpose housing, worsened by subsequent governments and nimby attitudes by householders (which in the Cotswolds there can often be unfortunately).

See Heseltine’s latest book which I’ve been reading plus countless other texts on housing.

In other news, some of the horrific cost legacy left behind by Boris’s hotel contracts have been reduced by 30% https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgeqwv98d55o

Now the government needs to speed up case processing especially for claimants who have committed crimes and/or from non-FCDO recognised conflict states eg Albania and Turkey. Should be some swift rejections and removals in there.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

If we have lots of spare housing in the local community; why are the waiting lists for social housing fucking massive?

Because people want to pick and choose which house they want. Got to have a seperate bedroom for each child, with a spare in case they have a visitor, plus 2 bathrooms. And certainly not on a sink estate.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Because people want to pick and choose which house they want. Got to have a seperate bedroom for each child, with a spare in case they have a visitor, plus 2 bathrooms. And certainly not on a sink estate.

So, there is lots of spare housing kicking around?

 

Edited by AlexLaw76
Posted
8 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

So, there is lots of spare housing kicking around?

 

That’s down to Right to Buy. The governments since have some responsibility but that’s where the main sell off and lack of re-investment in social housing stems from. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

That’s down to Right to Buy. The governments since have some responsibility but that’s where the main sell off and lack of re-investment in social housing stems from. 

there is lots of social housing available?

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

there is lots of social housing available?

There’s an insufficient amount of what would be deemed good quality social housing in key economic regions for UK residents who are tied to jobs/families/schools, but if you’re not tied to those needs/constraints - ASs for example - that’s less of an issue. You might be prepared to put up with poor decoration and/or an iffy housing estate if you’re claiming asylum. 

I don’t agree actually with Rayner and Starmer that there’s excess, there clearly isn’t because the Right to Buy reciepts were largely squandered, but using the borderline social housing that most British people in waiting lists can’t/don’t want to take up (and unemployment by moving out of area or losing grandparent childcare means they couldn’t pay the rent to be fair to them) is a lot cheaper that what Boris’s chums were charging us for hotels. Less of a focal point for the EDF and Reform’s football banning order brigade to hang around during pre-season although a few skirmishes in Epping at the weekend.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Posted
1 minute ago, Gloucester Saint said:

There’s an insufficient amount of what would be deemed good quality social housing in key economic regions for UK residents who are tied to jobs/families/schools, but if you’re not tied to those needs/constraints - ASs for example - that’s less of an issue. You might be prepared to put up with poor decoration and/or an iffy housing estate if you’re claiming asylum. 

I don’t agree actually with Rayner and Starmer that there’s excess, there clearly isn’t because the Right to Buy reciepts were largely squandered, but using the borderline social housing that most British people in waiting lists can’t/don’t want to take up (and unemployment by moving out of area or losing grandparent childcare means they couldn’t pay the rent to be fair to them) is a lot cheaper that what Boris’s chums were charging us for hotels. Less of a focal point for the EDF and Reform’s football banning order brigade to hang around during pre-season although a few skirmishes in Epping at the weekend.

So Starmer is taking utter bollox (again) then

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

So Starmer is taking utter bollox (again) then

As did Thatcher over Right to Buy, Blair didn’t help the situation, Cameron made it much worse still, Boris totally screwed the country and us as taxpayers to fund his mates over the hotels deal https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2720n2kkjo

So much so, two of the companies have to pay some of the excess profit back it was so gross https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2jw9jg99jo

I don’t like Starmer particularly either but he’s no worse or better any of the above, and Farage is worse than all of them. Still not seen that £350m for the NHS or Turkey joining the EU, lying rubber faced shit.

We took loads of shit over the tuition fee pledge in the coalition and got our arses handed to us in 2015 and 2019. If you’re a smaller party, you don’t have a whole tabloid and talk news empire behind you like Reform do, manifesto mistakes are fatal for a long time. Well on the way back now though and dicking all over the Tories in the South and South West.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Farage is worse than all of them. Still not seen that £350m for the NHS

Now you’re making things up, the 350m was Vote Leave, not Nigel. 

Laughable, people blaming a bloke that has 4 MP’s, and women who has been dead for over 10 years for Government failures….

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Now you’re making things up, the 350m was Vote Leave, not Nigel. 

Laughable, people blaming a bloke that has 4 MP’s, and women who has been dead for over 10 years for Government failures….

4% of social housing sold off by Right to Buy replaced since 1980. Yep, blaming a policy starting in 1980 is absolutely reasonable https://news.sky.com/story/end-right-to-buy-to-help-save-councils-from-2-2bn-black-hole-government-urged-13209490

As for rubber face, he was as much a part of Vote Leave as Boris as you well know and just as untruthful. And the reason he’s down to 4 MPs is that one of them is a wife beater and the other who took our football club into the abyss he fell out with (a common theme). Classy party. 

Nigel Pinocchio:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg6r7vyz4zo

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/nigel-farage-reform-winter-fuel-child-cap-b2757571.html

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2998klx2y0o

https://www.gmb.org.uk/news/farage-port-talbot-call-more-lies-from-chancer

https://nation.cymru/news/farage-claim-that-police-drove-protesters-to-demo-is-not-true-senior-officer/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1l47e86r39o

https://www.desmog.com/2025/07/17/reform-uk-nigel-farage-zia-yusuf-west-northamptonshire-council-doge/

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Posted
10 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

As did Thatcher over Right to Buy, Blair didn’t help the situation, Cameron made it much worse still, Boris totally screwed the country and us as taxpayers to fund his mates over the hotels deal https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2720n2kkjo

So much so, two of the companies have to pay some of the excess profit back it was so gross https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2jw9jg99jo

I don’t like Starmer particularly either but he’s no worse or better any of the above, and Farage is worse than all of them. Still not seen that £350m for the NHS or Turkey joining the EU, lying rubber faced shit.

We took loads of shit over the tuition fee pledge in the coalition and got our arses handed to us in 2015 and 2019. If you’re a smaller party, you don’t have a whole tabloid and talk news empire behind you like Reform do, manifesto mistakes are fatal for a long time. Well on the way back now though and dicking all over the Tories in the South and South West.

Long winded yes then.

its ok to call out the current government on its own

Posted
1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Long winded yes then.

its ok to call out the current government on its own

It's a tad ridiculous to blame a government who've had a year of shit mopping up for the social housing situation. Even her biggest fans would have to concede that the issue began with Thatcher allowing the sale of stock and not replacing it. I suspect Labour would love to be able to knock up large housing estates like we saw back in the day, but we're skint and that's not happening. 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, egg said:

It's a tad ridiculous to blame a government who've had a year of shit mopping up for the social housing situation. Even her biggest fans would have to concede that the issue began with Thatcher allowing the sale of stock and not replacing it. I suspect Labour would love to be able to knock up large housing estates like we saw back in the day, but we're skint and that's not happening. 

I am not. I merely asked if Starmer was talking pure shit by claiming, on record, that there is plenty of spare housing in local authorities.

he was either lying (again), or he is remarkably unaware.

Edited by AlexLaw76
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, egg said:

It's a tad ridiculous to blame a government who've had a year of shit mopping up for the social housing situation. Even her biggest fans would have to concede that the issue began with Thatcher allowing the sale of stock and not replacing it. I suspect Labour would love to be able to knock up large housing estates like we saw back in the day, but we're skint and that's not happening. 

That was a major blunder by Margaret Thatcher. She should have insisted that money made from the sale of council properties was ploughed back into building more local authority homes. As it was that money has gone, God knows where. Years back councils in Liverpool, faced with hundreds of derelict 2 up. 2 down, terraced houses, gave local people the chance to buy one for £1. Many of those people secured loans from the council to renovate their houses. I can't see why something like that could not be done today. It provides people with a home of their own, improves an area and often, reduces crime.

  • Like 2
Posted

Net migration has added about 7.5 million people to the uk since Maggie stepped down. Yet, that’s nothing to do with housing shortage, it’s all her fault 😂😂. We had 13 years of  New Labour to address it, yet it’s her fault. Selling council stock was incredibly popular, which is why New labour continued it, and she had a mandate to do it. 
 

What ever the rights and wrongs of it, the discussion started over Starmers ridiculous claim that there’s plenty of available homes. 
 

The bloke blunders about from one gaffe to another, out of his depth. Dan Hodges summed it up perfectly. 
 

“A Labour MP I spoke to recently is in despair at the Prime Minister. ‘He’s insane’, he told me. ‘How can he say that? How can he honestly think there’s huge amounts of spare housing? It’s mad.’

Another MP was even more blunt. ‘I want to scream,’ they said.

The truth is Downing Street is now starting to resemble Joe Biden’s White House. For years the ailing US president’s advisors had to scramble around covering up their charge’s growing infirmity. And now No 10 advisors have to engage in the same exercise, attempting to explain, rationalise and justify Keir Starmer’s blunders.

The issue is not, as the Prime Minister’s ‘allies’ would have people believe, that he is not furnished with sufficient detail to enable him to effectively run the country. It’s that he’s congenitally useless at it.

Keir Starmer’s first year in office has been a disaster. And that’s not because of his aides. It’s not because of his officials. It’s not because of his speechwriter. It’s because of Keir Starmer himself.”

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Net migration has added about 7.5 million people to the uk since Maggie stepped down. Yet, that’s nothing to do with housing shortage, it’s all her fault 😂😂. We had 13 years of  New Labour to address it, yet it’s her fault. Selling council stock was incredibly popular, which is why New labour continued it, and she had a mandate to do it. 
 

What ever the rights and wrongs of it, the discussion started over Starmers ridiculous claim that there’s plenty of available homes. 
 

The bloke blunders about from one gaffe to another, out of his depth. Dan Hodges summed it up perfectly. 
 

“A Labour MP I spoke to recently is in despair at the Prime Minister. ‘He’s insane’, he told me. ‘How can he say that? How can he honestly think there’s huge amounts of spare housing? It’s mad.’

Another MP was even more blunt. ‘I want to scream,’ they said.

The truth is Downing Street is now starting to resemble Joe Biden’s White House. For years the ailing US president’s advisors had to scramble around covering up their charge’s growing infirmity. And now No 10 advisors have to engage in the same exercise, attempting to explain, rationalise and justify Keir Starmer’s blunders.

The issue is not, as the Prime Minister’s ‘allies’ would have people believe, that he is not furnished with sufficient detail to enable him to effectively run the country. It’s that he’s congenitally useless at it.

Keir Starmer’s first year in office has been a disaster. And that’s not because of his aides. It’s not because of his officials. It’s not because of his speechwriter. It’s because of Keir Starmer himself.”

 

 

 

 

Jesus wept. That's a stretch of a stretch. 

Of course the mess isn't all on Maggy, but the origins were right to buy/lack of replacement stock/provision for a growing population. 

  • Like 5
Posted
1 hour ago, hypochondriac said:

It only took until page 46 for the topic of Starmer to devolve into a Thatcher discussion... 

Yeah we should be talking about more topical stuff like the India trade deal. Maybe we will have a copy and paste of the erudite Dan Hodges views later

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, whelk said:

Yeah we should be talking about more topical stuff like the India trade deal

Indeed... another fantastic 'Brexit Bonus'... ;)

(Tsk, tsk Trousers, you provocative little tyke)

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Starmer himself has said that it will take two terms to overturn all of the damage done by the years of Tory mismanagement.  Personally I think that it will take longer given the damage done. Sadly the great British public won’t give them that long and want everything fixed today. It is quite scary to hear the number of people who say that they are fed up with the Tories and Labour and claim that Farage can’t do any worse. Oh yes he can! Seems odd why they aren’t looking at the LibDems as a better option but I guess populist claptrap is resonating more with those who are easily (mis)led.

Apart from being too soft on Netanyahu, Starmer has been very good on the international stage and it has been good to see us represented by  someone who looks like a proper statesman.

He inherited a poisoned chalice domestically but hasn’t helped his cause with some in Labour like missteps. Still time to turn things round but he has to stop running scared of the Faragists. The fact that more and more of them are becoming emboldened and now think it is ok to crawl out from under their rocks just because Farage is playing the Trump cards does not mean that Starmer has to throw them some red meat too. There will always be people who will be swayed by the likes of Thatcher, Trump and Farage. People who only care about themselves. Starmer’s job is to rally the rest and show that we can be better than that. I don’t think anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence seriously expected a magic turn around in just 12 months, but he needs to do a better job of selling hope for a better future than he is at present.

*By the way, we were told that up to 5000 people could lose their lives due to the winter fuel cut in 24/25. Anyone know what the figure was? I am guessing it wasn’t the huge catastrophe we were led to believe it was by Badenoch and Farage as, unless I have missed something, they have both been very quiet on figures.

Edited by sadoldgit
Added text
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

am guessing it wasn’t the huge catastrophe we were led to believe it was by Badenoch and Farage as, unless I have missed something,

I think you have. I think you’ve missed the fact it’s been reversed, which indicates even Starmer thought it was a mistake. Unless you believe he thought “this is the correct policy, let’s reverse it”. Although to be fair, he is such an incompetent tool, I wouldn’t put that train of thought past him…..

Posted (edited)

As someone who doesn’t vote Labour or Tory and cutting out the noise, has Starmer done a good job objectively?

Internationally - yes, there’s some scraping of barrels online and in the tabloids but he kicks Boris’s arse on that score. They’ve done more more major trade deals, far more, than the Tories did in 10, and most of those bar Truss’s Aussie disaster shafting our farmers were done by Sunak. Rishi was alright actually but his situation was like Rusk last season.

Domestically - no, the NI increase had to happen but the lack of exemptions for SMEs under 5 staff, charities, education etc was stupid. Winter fuel allowance wasn’t worth the hassle and the optics around it were a mess. I didn’t agree with the extent of the climb down on welfare either.

As @egg said though, anyone who thinks it was anything other than inheriting the worst situation since Churchill or Attlee has got their head stuck up their arse, or is spending too much time on X. Don’t agree with circa 50% of the choices they’ve made but to argue it’s been a disaster is some serious drunkenness.

Truss - that’s a properly a disaster

Hard Brexit - losing 6% of your economy - that’s a disaster.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

It only took until page 46 for the topic of Starmer to devolve into a Thatcher discussion... 

Quite surprising isn’t it? Mind you, whilst it doesn’t feel like it, it is in modern history terms a while ago now. Most British history courses cover the period because you can’t understand today’s Britain without it. 

As a person, she was quite interesting and family friend worked for her - best boss he ever had. Didn’t agree with 50% of her policies but no denying she had a huge impact and genuinely cared about people on low-mid incomes even if her policies benefited them short-term but harmful in the longer-run. Hard to say many governments of any stripe have since.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

I am not. I merely asked if Starmer was talking pure shit by claiming, on record, that there is plenty of spare housing in local authorities.

he was either lying (again), or he is remarkably unaware.

I don’t agree with Starmer at headline level on the available data but life and policy is not as simple as ‘Get Brexit Done’ (we didn’t), or ‘Stop the Boats’ (we haven’t and nobody entirely will, whatever you hear on YouTube).

There’s a fair bit of stock that post-Grenfell and as tower blocks, older estates get beyond the point HA’s want to sink in yet more money renovating them, isn’t suitable, or most British families won’t consider. The Red Road Flats in Glasgow are a prime example in the years before they were demolished and housed ASs at scale. It’s not a long-term solution but it buys time to get the cases backlog under Braverman back under control.

It needs to be accompanied with faster and more ruthless processing, the AI tools and checks to stop people claiming u18 who aren’t is a start. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Corbyn still going on about the fucking Waspi women. Of all the things that need fixing in this country and that's in his first words. Utter twat.

  • Like 5
Posted
17 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

Starmer himself has said that it will take two terms to overturn all of the damage done by the years of Tory mismanagement.  Personally I think that it will take longer given the damage done. Sadly the great British public won’t give them that long and want everything fixed today. It is quite scary to hear the number of people who say that they are fed up with the Tories and Labour and claim that Farage can’t do any worse. Oh yes he can! Seems odd why they aren’t looking at the LibDems as a better option but I guess populist claptrap is resonating more with those who are easily (mis)led.

Apart from being too soft on Netanyahu, Starmer has been very good on the international stage and it has been good to see us represented by  someone who looks like a proper statesman.

He inherited a poisoned chalice domestically but hasn’t helped his cause with some in Labour like missteps. Still time to turn things round but he has to stop running scared of the Faragists. The fact that more and more of them are becoming emboldened and now think it is ok to crawl out from under their rocks just because Farage is playing the Trump cards does not mean that Starmer has to throw them some red meat too. There will always be people who will be swayed by the likes of Thatcher, Trump and Farage. People who only care about themselves. Starmer’s job is to rally the rest and show that we can be better than that. I don’t think anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence seriously expected a magic turn around in just 12 months, but he needs to do a better job of selling hope for a better future than he is at present.

*By the way, we were told that up to 5000 people could lose their lives due to the winter fuel cut in 24/25. Anyone know what the figure was? I am guessing it wasn’t the huge catastrophe we were led to believe it was by Badenoch and Farage as, unless I have missed something, they have both been very quiet on figures.

You seek validation and approval. you are a weak person who wants to be seen to in the right light. Some tips for gaining self confidence 

1 lift weights 

2 gain morning sunlight or exercise 

3 take up a new hobby or learn a skill even  20 minutes of something simple alike Duolingo can’t be transformative for your type 

4 eat a protein rich diet 

5 limit alcohol 

6 seek connections with others who have different views to you, understand them and accept them

7 be aware of your own worth, do not feel you have to apologise for being alive 

8 and most important leave your past where it belongs. Whatever you have done before let it go. A river cannot flow if it worries about the dam that once interrupted its path 

here I give you the keys to the kingdom of self worth, all you have to do is open it 

Posted
2 hours ago, Turkish said:

 

6 seek connections with others who have different views to you, understand them and accept them

 

Not a chance on those long morning strolls or lunches in various places, everyone has exactly the same views!

Posted
3 hours ago, Turkish said:

You seek validation and approval. you are a weak person who wants to be seen to in the right light. Some tips for gaining self confidence 

1 lift weights 

2 gain morning sunlight or exercise 

3 take up a new hobby or learn a skill even  20 minutes of something simple alike Duolingo can’t be transformative for your type 

4 eat a protein rich diet 

5 limit alcohol 

6 seek connections with others who have different views to you, understand them and accept them

7 be aware of your own worth, do not feel you have to apologise for being alive 

8 and most important leave your past where it belongs. Whatever you have done before let it go. A river cannot flow if it worries about the dam that once interrupted its path 

here I give you the keys to the kingdom of self worth, all you have to do is open it 

Hmm. I'm not sure that you can never again complain when SoG posts about posters rather than the subject. Unnecessary. 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

Starmer himself has said that it will take two terms to overturn all of the damage done by the years of Tory mismanagement.  Personally I think that it will take longer given the damage done. Sadly the great British public won’t give them that long and want everything fixed today. It is quite scary to hear the number of people who say that they are fed up with the Tories and Labour and claim that Farage can’t do any worse. Oh yes he can! Seems odd why they aren’t looking at the LibDems as a better option but I guess populist claptrap is resonating more with those who are easily (mis)led.

Apart from being too soft on Netanyahu, Starmer has been very good on the international stage and it has been good to see us represented by  someone who looks like a proper statesman.

He inherited a poisoned chalice domestically but hasn’t helped his cause with some in Labour like missteps. Still time to turn things round but he has to stop running scared of the Faragists. The fact that more and more of them are becoming emboldened and now think it is ok to crawl out from under their rocks just because Farage is playing the Trump cards does not mean that Starmer has to throw them some red meat too. There will always be people who will be swayed by the likes of Thatcher, Trump and Farage. People who only care about themselves. Starmer’s job is to rally the rest and show that we can be better than that. I don’t think anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence seriously expected a magic turn around in just 12 months, but he needs to do a better job of selling hope for a better future than he is at present.

*By the way, we were told that up to 5000 people could lose their lives due to the winter fuel cut in 24/25. Anyone know what the figure was? I am guessing it wasn’t the huge catastrophe we were led to believe it was by Badenoch and Farage as, unless I have missed something, they have both been very quiet on figures.

Once again you show disgusting traits and double standards. Your political views are exceptionally childish for all to see. If the Tories had cut the allowance and someone had said something like that about deaths being lower than expected you would be all over them. What figure is acceptable? 500? So when your team does things that kill people, it is OK and justifiable as the figures were not as high as expected? You disgusting scum. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Once again you show disgusting traits and double standards. Your political views are exceptionally childish for all to see. If the Tories had cut the allowance and someone had said something like that about deaths being lower than expected you would be all over them. What figure is acceptable? 500? So when your team does things that kill people, it is OK and justifiable as the figures were not as high as expected? You disgusting scum. 

Is this intended as irony?

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said:

You disgusting scum. 

If you are going to use terms such as this, perhaps you might need a reference point as to what ‘disgusting scum’ truly looks (and smells, according to the skates I know) like https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/football/portsmouth-fc/im-disappointed-with-myself-portsmouth-fc-fanatic-john-westwood-banned-for-second-time-this-season-after-publicly-urinating-outside-forest-green-stadium-3896168

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, egg said:

Hmm. I'm not sure that you can never again complain when SoG posts about posters rather than the subject. Unnecessary. 

Rather than attacking other posters which is his modus operandi I’ve given him some sound advice.
 

Do you disagree that even implementing one of those tactics will improve his life? Imagine if he put all 5-8 into practise it would be transformative. I’m only trying to help. I’ve been quite gracious in the fact that I’m helping someone despite the fact he clearly despises me for no other reason that we don’t see eye to eye on a few things and I don’t tolerate his lies. This is the mark of a great man he could be too but he needs to work at it. People charge a lot of money for such support he gets it free on here 

Edited by Turkish
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

I’ve given him some sound advice.

Point 8 is bs. The past makes you. I am only the colossus I am due to my amazing past

Edited by whelk
Posted
10 minutes ago, whelk said:

Those that do that are some of the biggest cunts on the planet

Agreed that the gym bros are mainly bellends, particularly the ones that do arm curls in the squat tech but done properly the benefits are insane 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...