Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
52 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

Reform MP: Shame the French didn't defend sovereignty in 1940

As we've reported in the last hour, the French government has hit back at Reform UK's plan to deploy the Royal Navy in the Channel to pick up small migrants and deposit them back on French soil - whether or not the French agree to allow British military personnel in their territorial waters.

An interior ministry spokesperson said it would be "a violation of French sovereignty as well as a violation of maritime law and international law".

A Reform MP has now responded to the French government's statement by bringing up what is likely a sore point - the start of the Second World War.

Sarah Pochin wrote on X: "Pity the French did not show the same resolve in defending their sovereignty in June 1940."

 

The word cunt is not strong enough to describe this vile excuse for a human.

How could anyone vote for a party who has shit like that in its ranks

I didn't realise we had height restrictions. Health and safety must trump immigration policy.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I try not to demonise Reform politicians and voters with having single digit IQs but when they say things like Pochin just did, and launch pathetic unworkable ‘policies’ like yesterday, I don’t need to. They do a great job of it all by themselves.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/reform-mp-sarah-pochin-france-world-war-two-jibe-408436/

That said, in answer to the Lib Dem councillor asking how she ever got elected, that’s because Mike Amesbury started punching people in the street. Not a good idea, not least if you’re the town’s MP. 

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
On 11/07/2026 at 11:18, Gloucester Saint said:

 

2 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

Reform MP: Shame the French didn't defend sovereignty in 1940

As we've reported in the last hour, the French government has hit back at Reform UK's plan to deploy the Royal Navy in the Channel to pick up small migrants and deposit them back on French soil - whether or not the French agree to allow British military personnel in their territorial waters.

An interior ministry spokesperson said it would be "a violation of French sovereignty as well as a violation of maritime law and international law".

A Reform MP has now responded to the French government's statement by bringing up what is likely a sore point - the start of the Second World War.

Sarah Pochin wrote on X: "Pity the French did not show the same resolve in defending their sovereignty in June 1940."

 

The word cunt is not strong enough to describe this vile excuse for a human.

How could anyone vote for a party who has shit like that in its ranks

I’m sure she has great knowledge of the strength of the Wehrmacht at that time. Sure she might have something to say about allies retreating to Dunkirk too? If only they showed the courage and resilience of the Reform patriot gobshites eh. Could have all been over in 1943

Edited by whelk
Not sure why Gloucester’s post was quoted
  • Like 1
Posted

I get people are wanting immigration sorted. But seriously can’t understand how anyone can be attracted to these shite hawks. Pochin”s French WW2 comment is deplorable and also ironic, as she is exactly the sort of slag who would be a collaborator. Not one of these Reform types would have the courage or conviction to be in the Resistance 

  • Like 4
Posted
35 minutes ago, whelk said:

Sounding like a Reform cunt but Yusuf isn’t a British sounding name. Why hasn’t he changed it to Bob or Burt?

He fails Rupert's Britishness test as well.

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Today's the day for Nigel to shine!

Will he beat the 36 other contenders for the hottest ticket in Clacton or will he be bested by a bin or a seagull or something?

Who knows?  Who cares?

Count Binface was polling at 20% up to yesterday.

  • Haha 2
Posted

Polling has closed in Clacton and nobody is expecting anything other than a win for Farage.

To anyone in Clacton who still believes he has the best interests of your constituency at heart and has been out and voted for him today, I have one question...

What the fuck is wrong with you?

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Frankly this is all waffle that makes some posters feel good.

I probably wouldn’t vote for Reform but out of interest, what was the objective in the past 7 posts?

Edited by Sir Ralph
Posted
1 hour ago, Sir Ralph said:

Frankly this is all waffle that makes some posters feel good.

I probably wouldn’t vote for Reform but out of interest, what was the objective in the past 7 posts?

They just show the normal decline in quality after one of my posts, which was eight posts back. 😀

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

Frankly this is all waffle that makes some posters feel good.

I probably wouldn’t vote for Reform but out of interest, what was the objective in the past 7 posts?

Oh it’s objective posts you are after? Sounds like you might to lighten up

  • Haha 3
Posted
6 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

Frankly this is all waffle that makes some posters feel good.

I probably wouldn’t vote for Reform but out of interest, what was the objective in the past 7 posts?

I'm astonished that it seems to have passed you by, but I assume it was to mock the frog faced bellend.

  • Like 2
Posted

Essex police have confirmed that Farage's claim they advised him not to attend the result declaration in person was untrue. 

Claiming he's been vindicated by the people of Clacton, and then making up false statements about security concerns to continue to avoid actually having to spend any time there is such a great look.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

Frankly this is all waffle that makes some posters feel good.

I probably wouldn’t vote for Reform but out of interest, what was the objective in the past 7 posts?

To indicate that people reject Zia Yusuf's claim that Ben Wallace is a "traitor", and that anybody with at least 2 brain cells can see through Reform's xenophobic tripe. It is by calling out the embedded nastiness in Farage's personality cult, tinged with typically British satirical humour, that they can be combatted and defeated.

Sitting back and letting things slide is the path to a British Nuremburg.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 3
Posted
25 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

To indicate that people reject Zia Yusuf's claim that Ben Wallace is a "traitor", and that anybody with at least 2 brain cells can see through Reform's xenophobic tripe. It is by calling out the embedded nastiness in Farage's personality cult, tinged with typically British satirical humour, that they can be combatted and defeated.

Sitting back and letting things slide is the path to a British Nuremburg.

This guy probably agrees that he is a traitor. Cares most about his stocks portfolio and far less about people’s character 

Posted
1 hour ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Essex police have confirmed that Farage's claim they advised him not to attend the result declaration in person was untrue. 

Claiming he's been vindicated by the people of Clacton, and then making up false statements about security concerns to continue to avoid actually having to spend any time there is such a great look.

Surprised he's worried about security concerns.  Last I heard he was spunking 5M on his own personal security.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, whelk said:

This guy probably agrees that he is a traitor. Cares most about his stocks portfolio and far less about people’s character 

 Farage says he will not attend the count, saying: "I am damned if I am going to stand on a stage, having won a resounding victory... and be demeaned and humiliated by nobodies." He says Essex Police told him about an "organised campaign to disrupt and degrade the result"

03:35 A Reform UK spokesperson says Essex Police advised Farage not to attend the count "due to a credible threat against him"

05:13 The BBC reports that it understands Essex Police did not advise any candidate that they should not attend, and the force says it has a "robust policing operation to ensure the safety and security of all participants"

  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, ecuk268 said:

 Farage says he will not attend the count, saying: "I am damned if I am going to stand on a stage, having won a resounding victory... and be demeaned and humiliated by nobodies." He says Essex Police told him about an "organised campaign to disrupt and degrade the result"

03:35 A Reform UK spokesperson says Essex Police advised Farage not to attend the count "due to a credible threat against him"

05:13 The BBC reports that it understands Essex Police did not advise any candidate that they should not attend, and the force says it has a "robust policing operation to ensure the safety and security of all participants"

He wouldn't lie, would he? 

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

He wouldn't lie, would he? 

Think it’s likely that he hasn’t lied. All of the statements you replied to would be true if police were aware of someone like Simon Brodkin planning something similar to what he did with Sepp Blatter.

The ‘credible threat’ isn’t necessarily of physical violence even if the wording was used to imply that.

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, ChrisPY said:

Think it’s likely that he hasn’t lied. All of the statements you replied to would be true if police were aware of someone like Simon Brodkin planning something similar to what he did with Sepp Blatter.

The ‘credible threat’ isn’t necessarily of physical violence even if the wording was used to imply that.

 

So Essex Police are lying by stating they didn't advise any candidate not to attend?

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

So Essex Police are lying by stating they didn't advise any candidate not to attend?

Would advising a candidate to not attend the count be electoral interference ?

Posted
47 minutes ago, ChrisPY said:

Think it’s likely that he hasn’t lied. All of the statements you replied to would be true if police were aware of someone like Simon Brodkin planning something similar to what he did with Sepp Blatter.

The ‘credible threat’ isn’t necessarily of physical violence even if the wording was used to imply that.

 

But Essex police say they didn't advise any candidate not to attend.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

But Essex police say they didn't advise any candidate not to attend.

Yep. People will still believe the BS though. State of the nation etc. 

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

But Essex police say they didn't advise any candidate not to attend.

30p Lee was on R4 this morning saying that the "Essex police lie, like you lot at the BBC".

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, ecuk268 said:

30p Lee was on R4 this morning saying that the "Essex police lie, like you lot at the BBC".

It would be hilarious if this cunt got attacked and the police didn’t turn up as he is a prolific liar they assumed it wasn’t genuine

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said:

So Essex Police are lying by stating they didn't advise any candidate not to attend?

They could have made him aware of the planned stunt/protest and because they considered there no concern of physical harm they would allow it to proceed so it was up to him if he attended or not.

I don’t think he’s said they advised him not to attend, just that they provided information that led to that decision.

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, ChrisPY said:

They could have made him aware of the planned stunt/protest and because they considered there no concern of physical harm they would allow it to proceed so it was up to him if he attended or not.

I don’t think he’s said they advised him not to attend, just that they provided information that led to that decision.

 

So did Essex police lie or not? Anderson said they did.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, ChrisPY said:

They could have made him aware of the planned stunt/protest and because they considered there no concern of physical harm they would allow it to proceed so it was up to him if he attended or not.

I don’t think he’s said they advised him not to attend, just that they provided information that led to that decision.

 

He said at his gathering of the deluded, stupid and easily fooled.. "Essex police advised me not to attend"

So he is lying as they have stated they didn't advise him not to attend

Posted
10 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

22 thousand, certainly.

A skinhead in a West Ham shirt, covered in swastika tattoos and holding a can of Stella would have got at least 22k and north of 60% of the vote in that seat. Even Rupert Lowe could.

Parliamentary enquiry is still ongoing, Nigel had another stropsie and a bin won 27% of the vote against him. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

He said at his gathering of the deluded, stupid and easily fooled.. "Essex police advised me not to attend"

So he is lying as they have stated they didn't advise him not to attend

Ah ok, those words would make him a liar.

(Sorry, Nigel, I tried.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...