Jump to content

The Reform Thread

sadoldgit

By sadoldgit
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ecuk268 said:

Another one of Nige's law-abiding mates.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/raise-the-colours-ryan-bridge-37634453?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=main&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwY2xjawULmOBwZG9mAWV4dG4DYWVtAjEwAGJyaWQRMDNyVUlDUFhNQkNCUFBOb2pzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEePdCcuKPEqanekomc2khVb-EA1P1-78oifO1VDe9dlyH0xtCSe-DfDNCkivY_aem_J37HeUTbm7rk95byuyY7ig#Echobox=1788774648

It’s a common theme with the BNP, sorry, I meant Raise the Colours lot https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxp2n3eqy7o

One other member of that group pepper sprayed someone after wrongly accusing them of stealing his bicycle.

Another has been inside for drug dealing and importation.

Bridge himself has also had a 3 year football banning order. 

tdmickey3

tdmickey3

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

It’s a common theme with the BNP, sorry, I meant Raise the Colours lot https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxp2n3eqy7o

One other member of that group pepper sprayed someone after wrongly accusing them of stealing his bicycle.

Another has been inside for drug dealing and importation.

Bridge himself has also had a 3 year football banning order. 

This sort of pig are our saviours apparently 

Wade Garrett

Wade Garrett

Posted
Posted

Went right off Farage as soon as he ordered oysters and was talking about a champagne top on his Guinness.

Man of the people my arse.  Still a better better bet than Labour, but that is a very very low bar.

Think Badenoch is on a run now.  Looks the best of the bunch to me.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
tdmickey3

tdmickey3

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

Uh-oh...

Nigel and his top table of law abiders said Reform have not done anything wrong do nothing to see here.

But of course we know they are lying racist cunts

Edited by tdmickey3
Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Absolute scum threatening RNLI volunteers https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly47p5vk63o 

The irony here being that scum floats on the surface, and If he was ever called out to help any of these lowlifes in distress at sea he would undoubtedly show the same regard for human life that he would for anyone else, but would be well within his rights to just let the cunts drown.

  • Like 2
Holmes_and_Watson

Holmes_and_Watson

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Absolute scum threatening RNLI volunteers https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly47p5vk63o 

Well, they should stop faking call outs, so they can run a migrant invasion service from France. As soon as I heard, I removed all the things I'd bought from their shop, and anything with a nautical theme, just to be safe. No one in my Patriot group will have any suspicions using my bathroom after the next meeting. We're also looking to move inland, in protest too.

aintforever

aintforever

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Absolute scum threatening RNLI volunteers https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly47p5vk63o 

A friend of mine was one of the RNLI guys down there, he said he was assaulted, threatened and abused, even had his name put online. These are people who volunteer to risk their lives saving other people. 
 

It’s no surprise that the ringleader of the scum involved is a convicted criminal, they are just a bunch of racist thugs looking for a dust up.

 

  • Like 3
Holmes_and_Watson

Holmes_and_Watson

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, aintforever said:

A friend of mine was one of the RNLI guys down there, he said he was assaulted, threatened and abused, even had his name put online. These are people who volunteer to risk their lives saving other people. 
 

It’s no surprise that the ringleader of the scum involved is a convicted criminal, they are just a bunch of racist thugs looking for a dust up.

 

I laughed at suggestions of  "naming and shaming" the RNLI guys. Even when Balaclava wearers, who definitely don't want to be named and shamed, enter the sea, the RNLI will be there to save them, regardless of the conditions.

  • Like 3
Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)

Damning Sky News piece on the sheer chaos in Reform’s Durham County Council. Andrew Husband, Farage’s mini me, getting a hammering. Another of their ex-councillors and former soldier there refers to it as a cult.

If it walks like Trump and quacks like Trump…

 

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Like 1
ecuk268

ecuk268

Posted
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Well, they should stop faking call outs, so they can run a migrant invasion service from France. As soon as I heard, I removed all the things I'd bought from their shop, and anything with a nautical theme, just to be safe. No one in my Patriot group will have any suspicions using my bathroom after the next meeting. We're also looking to move inland, in protest too.

Refuse to go on holiday anywhere near the coast.

And stop eating fish.

Edited by ecuk268
Wade Garrett

Wade Garrett

Posted
Posted

It seems Reform are imploding but I don’t see that as positive for Labour.  I don’t think they’ll get many of their former voters back as Burnham appears clueless and unwilling to make the tough decisions the country needs.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Wade Garrett said:

It seems Reform are imploding but I don’t see that as positive for Labour.  I don’t think they’ll get many of their former voters back as Burnham appears clueless and unwilling to make the tough decisions the country needs.

Burnham is gaining more ground on the Greens as Polanski gets found out.

Most Reform switchers, 8-9/10 statistically, are ex-Tories if you look at Curtis’s videos, so it’s how many/enough will make the move back given how tribal it’s become between Reform and the Tories. Can’t ever see Jenrick being forgiven - that was Harry/Saints - and Braverman is off her rocker. Plenty of councillors are switching back or going independent. 

I’m Lib Dem, so any gains we get are from are Badenoch shifting right wards (I know a few One Nation Tories she’s banned from standing who are switching yellow) and where Labour voters see us as the only option tactically to beat Reform where the Tory vote hasn’t recovered yet. Ditto many ex-Tory seats with former One Nation MPs.

  • Like 1
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Wade Garrett said:

It seems Reform are imploding but I don’t see that as positive for Labour.  I don’t think they’ll get many of their former voters back as Burnham appears clueless and unwilling to make the tough decisions the country needs.

Opinions are like arseholes, everybody has one.

  • Like 2
Holmes_and_Watson

Holmes_and_Watson

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, ecuk268 said:

Refuse to go on holiday anywhere near the coast.

And stop eating fish.

Torn between getting to only land-locked countries for holidays and having to fly over a coast to get to them. What if I see the RNLI helping the invasion force from the plane?!

Wade Garrett

Wade Garrett

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Burnham is gaining more ground on the Greens as Polanski gets found out.

Most Reform switchers, 8-9/10 statistically, are ex-Tories if you look at Curtis’s videos, so it’s how many/enough will make the move back given how tribal it’s become between Reform and the Tories. Can’t ever see Jenrick being forgiven - that was Harry/Saints - and Braverman is off her rocker. Plenty of councillors are switching back or going independent. 

I’m Lib Dem, so any gains we get are from are Badenoch shifting right wards (I know a few One Nation Tories she’s banned from standing who are switching yellow) and where Labour voters see us as the only option tactically to beat Reform where the Tory vote hasn’t recovered yet. Ditto many ex-Tory seats with former One Nation MPs.

Plenty of red wall Labour voters with Reform at the moment.  If they continue stumbling from one fuck up to the next I don’t think these voters will go back to Labour and the EU loving, hug an illegal, PM.

badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Not quite sure what your point is?

You post your opinions as if they bore the the veracity of fact. ( And maybe "bore" is the key word ).

Edited by badgerx16
whelk

whelk

Posted
Posted

I’d happily donate to RNLI if they gave me assurance they wouldn’t save middle-aged fat overweight bald fucks in Ben Sherman trunks.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Gloucester Saint

Gloucester Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Wade Garrett said:

Plenty of red wall Labour voters with Reform at the moment.  If they continue stumbling from one fuck up to the next I don’t think these voters will go back to Labour and the EU loving, hug an illegal, PM.

Corbyn got more votes than Starmer did, but they were piled up in certain seats and insufficient spread 2019 vs 2024. Reform are heading the same way and tactical voting will do them in even if the bungs and sleaze don’t. Net result - clusters of big majorities but large geographical areas where there’s no Reform MP. Plus the Reform councils have been a disaster so far with huge tax rises, walkouts, defections and expulsions, as evidenced by this today’s piece on Durham by Sky News. 

I don’t think most people would see AB as ‘Hug an Illegal’ realistically. Starmer - different story. Earlier in his career he’d been a human right lawyer and that’s why the daft ‘Island of Strangers’ comment rang so hollow. Burnham is also northern. I suspect that demographic won’t vote for Lowe in huge numbers, although enough to hurt Reform, nor a Tory party with the current leader. If the Tories go for a different leader, that demographic might move back in a larger numbers, but the data shows Badenoch is actually well ahead of her own party’s ratings, as Burnham is for Labour’s, and their core membership which is strongly SE/Home Counties/E Mids/Anglia/SW peninsula by and large seem very content with her. 

And that core membership is geographically, socially and educationally at odds with the people we are talking about who left them. Not dissimilar to what’s happened with Labour.

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Wade Garrett

Wade Garrett

Posted
Posted
On 10/09/2026 at 16:46, badgerx16 said:

You post your opinions as if they bore the the veracity of fact. ( And maybe "bore" is the key word ).

Not really, just my opinion.

Sorry I bore you.

Sir Ralph

Sir Ralph

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, benjii said:

£36m from a financial criminal. Seems normal and perfectly rational.

Dealing in facts - which crimes has he been convicted of. If he hasn’t he isn’t a criminal - great news that people are donating to these parties. Light at the end of the tunnel in Europe

Sir Ralph

Sir Ralph

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

I post on everything mate. Take a look.

Happy for you to point me to that post being the balanced and non partisan poster I’m sure you are. I’ve no doubt you can back up your statement with the requisite evidence. I noticed you didn’t answer the questions yet (again)

Edited by Sir Ralph
  • Haha 2
JohnnyShearer2.0

JohnnyShearer2.0

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Happy for you to point me to that post being the balanced and non partisan poster I’m sure you are. I’ve no doubt you can back up your statement with the requisite evidence. I noticed you didn’t answer the questions yet (again)

All there mate for you. I think there is a search function that you can use. 

Which questions were they again?

Sir Ralph

Sir Ralph

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

All there mate for you. I think there is a search function that you can use. 

Which questions were they again?

I looked nothing there. So the answer to whether you raised this issue with convicted Labour donors is “no” = double standards. I didn’t find a lot of unanswered questions though. How about this, I’ll give you another chance….Whilst it isn’t illegal to take donations from people with convictions do you ageee that Labour are no better than reform in this respect as they have recieved donations from criminals?

 

The questions were in the message - you don’t even need a search function

Edited by Sir Ralph
badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

Not harborne though. Did you post on here about shere sattars convictions and the therefore the unacceptable nature of his donations? Also is this acceptance of these donations illegal?

Didn't Labour return that money ?

JohnnyShearer2.0

JohnnyShearer2.0

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

I looked nothing there. So the answer to whether you raised this issue with convicted Labour donors is “no” = double standards. I didn’t find a lot of unanswered questions though. How about this, I’ll give you another chance….Whilst it isn’t illegal to take donations from people with convictions do you ageee that Labour are no better than reform in this respect as they have recieved donations from criminals?

 

The questions were in the message - you don’t even need a search function

Bit of a difference between getting a £40k donation and £30m odd one.

Labour were called out on it and did they not return the donations?

Hopefully Reform will do the same. 

 

Sir Ralph

Sir Ralph

Posted
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Didn't Labour return that money ?

Not sure whether they did but if they did fair enough. They didn’t return all donations from other criminals though. Look up David Neal and the Welsh Labour campaign. Accepted multiple donations, were called out on it. And didn’t return the £

Edited by Sir Ralph
Sir Ralph

Sir Ralph

Posted
Posted
Just now, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Bit of a difference between getting a £40k donation and £30m odd one.

Labour were called out on it and did they not return the donations?

Hopefully Reform will do the same. 

 

I’ve responded on the returned donations.

Your argument about the amount is very weak. It’s the principle. Did they accept donations and not return them from convicted criminals in the same manner you have criticised reform? It’s a simple yes or no

JohnnyShearer2.0

JohnnyShearer2.0

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

I’ve responded on the returned donations.

Your argument about the amount is very weak. It’s the principle. Did they accept donations and not return them from convicted criminals in the same manner you have criticised reform? It’s a simple yes or no

Can you give examples of the other criminals and their donations. 

AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Can you give examples of the other criminals and their donations. 

They just get the best jobs and nice pay offs....

image.png.651f8f18fde2483be0bc8959c758f623.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...