sadoldgit Posted yesterday at 11:56 Posted yesterday at 11:56 (edited) So much here to discuss. Did he really kill himself? His “suicide” was certainly convenient.* Why has it taken so long for the files to be disclosed and what is in the millions of files yet to be disclosed by the DOJ? Epstein and Maxwell are the only people to see the inside of a cell so far. Andrew Mountbatten and Lord Mandelson have faced disgrace here, but neither have faced criminal proceedings, yet. Some of the redacted files clearly implicate the current POTUS with paedophlia. Where do you start? * An associate of Epstein’s, Jean-Luc Brunel, also committed suicide in a police cell by hanging. Edited yesterday at 12:22 by sadoldgit 1
Turkish Posted yesterday at 11:59 Posted yesterday at 11:59 Isnt there already a thread to slag Trump off on? As this is clearly the purpose of this one.
sadoldgit Posted yesterday at 13:26 Author Posted yesterday at 13:26 (edited) Downing Street have passed on emails from Mandelson to the police and are now working on legislation to remove his peerage. The Clinton’s are to testify. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/02/bill-clinton-interview-rejected-epstein Edited yesterday at 13:28 by sadoldgit 1
sadoldgit Posted yesterday at 15:57 Author Posted yesterday at 15:57 For those who missed it. If true it takes Trump to an even lower level. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-donald-trump-accused-measuring-36646003# 1
badgerx16 Posted yesterday at 16:27 Posted yesterday at 16:27 25 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: For those who missed it. If true it takes Trump to an even lower level. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-donald-trump-accused-measuring-36646003# They are either confident that such claims are utter nonsense, or it's the biggest bluff ever played.
Sarnia Cherie Posted yesterday at 16:36 Posted yesterday at 16:36 Mandelson has stepped down from the House of Lords. Still able to keep the name Lord, apparently. I can think of a few suitable names for him and Lord isn't on the list. 1
badgerx16 Posted yesterday at 16:37 Posted yesterday at 16:37 (edited) Thousands of documents have been taken down from the website as they revealed victims' names, email addresses, and even nude photos. Edited yesterday at 16:38 by badgerx16
Farmer Saint Posted yesterday at 17:35 Posted yesterday at 17:35 58 minutes ago, Sarnia Cherie said: Mandelson has stepped down from the House of Lords. Still able to keep the name Lord, apparently. I can think of a few suitable names for him and Lord isn't on the list. Gaylord?
Sheaf Saint Posted yesterday at 18:18 Posted yesterday at 18:18 6 hours ago, sadoldgit said: So much here to discuss. Did he really kill himself? His “suicide” was certainly convenient.* Why has it taken so long for the files to be disclosed and what is in the millions of files yet to be disclosed by the DOJ? Epstein and Maxwell are the only people to see the inside of a cell so far. Andrew Mountbatten and Lord Mandelson have faced disgrace here, but neither have faced criminal proceedings, yet. Some of the redacted files clearly implicate the current POTUS with paedophlia. Where do you start? * An associate of Epstein’s, Jean-Luc Brunel, also committed suicide in a police cell by hanging. The Met have now launched a criminal investigation into Mandelson. 1
rallyboy Posted yesterday at 18:27 Posted yesterday at 18:27 5 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said: The Met have now launched a criminal investigation into Mandelson. Good, if they can prove what is alleged he should be in prison. Along with Mone, Boris, Hancock, Farage, and all the others who have used their positions to manipulate markets or to line their own pockets. 5
badgerx16 Posted yesterday at 18:31 Posted yesterday at 18:31 (edited) In September last year FBI Director Kash Patel was questioned in a Congressional Committee about the files. He was asked how many times Trump was mentioned in them; "Is it a thousand ?" he was asked, "It's not" was his reply. "Is it 500 ?", "No" "Is it a hundred ?" "I don't know what it is, but it isn't that". TBF, Patel was right, Trump is mentioned 4896 times in the papers released so far, and there are still 3 million documents that are unreleased and that the DoJ say will not be made public, despite the Court and Congressional instructions to do so. Edited yesterday at 18:44 by badgerx16 2 1
badgerx16 Posted yesterday at 18:45 Posted yesterday at 18:45 Yes Nic, this stuff is fucking hilarious. 2
whelk Posted yesterday at 18:47 Posted yesterday at 18:47 2 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Yes Nic, this stuff is fucking hilarious. One of his own 1
badgerx16 Posted yesterday at 18:51 Posted yesterday at 18:51 1 minute ago, whelk said: One of his own If you go to the DoJ Epstein website it asks whether you are at least 18 years of age, "Yes" or "No". According to Jimmy Kimmel, if you answer "No" it goes on to ask "Are you cute ? Can you upload a photo ?". 1
Lighthouse Posted yesterday at 19:12 Posted yesterday at 19:12 I can neither confirm nor deny that Epstein has ever hosted a Saints Web admin curry and have no recollection of any donations being made to this website. 2
Farmer Saint Posted yesterday at 19:16 Posted yesterday at 19:16 45 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: In September last year FBI Director Kash Patel was questioned in a Congressional Committee about the files. He was asked how many times Trump was mentioned in them; "Is it a thousand ?" he was asked, "It's not" was his reply. "Is it 500 ?", "No" "Is it a hundred ?" "I don't know what it is, but it isn't that". TBF, Patel was right, Trump is mentioned 4896 times in the papers released so far, and there are still 3 million documents that are unreleased and that the DoJ say will not be made public, despite the Court and Congressional instructions to do so. I love Jimmy K. 1
east-stand-nic Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 11 hours ago, whelk said: One of his own Vile human being. Just about human maybe. 1
egg Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago There's still a lack of open media discussion about who this bloke was. Mark Adderley (hardly neutral I appreciate) is pushing the line about him being a mossad agent, and essentially being a honey trap, them compromising people. I've no idea what the truth is, but the only commentary is about him being a dead nonce, not what he actually was. 2
badgerx16 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said: Vile human being. Just about human maybe. Self reflection ? 1
egg Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago Just now, badgerx16 said: Self reflection ? Pop him in ignore mate, makes thread feeds much better. Until someone quotes him. 1 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 45 minutes ago, egg said: There's still a lack of open media discussion about who this bloke was. Mark Adderley (hardly neutral I appreciate) is pushing the line about him being a mossad agent, and essentially being a honey trap, them compromising people. I've no idea what the truth is, but the only commentary is about him being a dead nonce, not what he actually was. It is f-in wired isn’t it. he was obviously topped, and his slapped missus is obviously keeping quiet, or being kept quiet. imagine the revelations to come of what we don’t know yet. im sure Mandelson will get away with it. Probably NFA from the police
sadoldgit Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 2 hours ago, egg said: There's still a lack of open media discussion about who this bloke was. Mark Adderley (hardly neutral I appreciate) is pushing the line about him being a mossad agent, and essentially being a honey trap, them compromising people. I've no idea what the truth is, but the only commentary is about him being a dead nonce, not what he actually was. Where did he get the money from? Like you I have seen links to Israel. An article yesterday looked at things that Mossad have been linked with, including Robert Maxwell’s death. It was suggested that Maxwell was working for Mossad and when he became a liability they bumped him off. His daughter of course is now doing time for her activities with Epstein. Epstein had reach across the world and didn’t get to where he was without powerful support.
egg Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 33 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: Where did he get the money from? Like you I have seen links to Israel. An article yesterday looked at things that Mossad have been linked with, including Robert Maxwell’s death. It was suggested that Maxwell was working for Mossad and when he became a liability they bumped him off. His daughter of course is now doing time for her activities with Epstein. Epstein had reach across the world and didn’t get to where he was without powerful support. Indeed. The bloke somehow built a network like nobody else, the money to seduce and influence, and enough dirt to assert pressure. He came from nowhere to do that. It'll be interesting to see what's in the yet unseen files, although I suspect we'll never know. Edited 8 hours ago by egg
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 6 hours ago, egg said: There's still a lack of open media discussion about who this bloke was. Mark Adderley (hardly neutral I appreciate) is pushing the line about him being a mossad agent, and essentially being a honey trap, them compromising people. I've no idea what the truth is, but the only commentary is about him being a dead nonce, not what he actually was. I'd also seen links (I didn't really get past the headlines) of links to Russia. So much we don't know, with pretty much everyone involved doing their utmost to cover up what they can. Let's hope all of the redacted due to being part of investigation material, gets put to good use. 1
egg Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 30 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: I'd also seen links (I didn't really get past the headlines) of links to Russia. So much we don't know, with pretty much everyone involved doing their utmost to cover up what they can. Let's hope all of the redacted due to being part of investigation material, gets put to good use. Adderley's approach, and others, is that the Russian links is the line being fed, seemingly based on one pic of him wearing a cossack hat, but not the reality. There's a lot of conjecture, but I do find it very odd that a nobody burst into the scene as this fella did, became unfathomably rich without any clear source of wealth, and became so well connected. Let's see what comes out. 2
tdmickey3 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Its really galling that this cunt never got his just punishment for his disgusting ways. Hopefully all the vile pieces of shit involved will get theirs.
benjii Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 10 hours ago, egg said: There's still a lack of open media discussion about who this bloke was. Mark Adderley (hardly neutral I appreciate) is pushing the line about him being a mossad agent, and essentially being a honey trap, them compromising people. I've no idea what the truth is, but the only commentary is about him being a dead nonce, not what he actually was. It's very murky. The Maxwell / Israel connection is obviously interesting. Lots of evidence he could have been working for Russia too, and it seems quite likely Trump was laundering money for the Russians (who likely had kompromat collected by Epstein). 1
benjii Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, egg said: Adderley's approach, and others, is that the Russian links is the line being fed, seemingly based on one pic of him wearing a cossack hat, but not the reality. There's a lot of conjecture, but I do find it very odd that a nobody burst into the scene as this fella did, became unfathomably rich without any clear source of wealth, and became so well connected. Let's see what comes out. A lot of the emails refer to conversations with Russian figures and there are also the links with Bannon, who was obviously involved in the Russian election interference.
Gloucester Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 28 minutes ago, benjii said: Is that a genuine photo or the Wrexham Labour AI one? Much as I loathe the toad-faced grifter, I also loathe AI-generated misinformation wherever it comes from. 3
benjii Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Is that a genuine photo or the Wrexham Labour AI one? Much as I loathe the toad-faced grifter, I also loathe AI-generated misinformation wherever it comes from. I dunno. Could be fake. I don't think Farage is a nonce, but he definitely has shady financial backing. 1
sadoldgit Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Is that a genuine photo or the Wrexham Labour AI one? Much as I loathe the toad-faced grifter, I also loathe AI-generated misinformation wherever it comes from. He is mentioned several times in the files released so far. There are exchanges with Bannon and Epstein about having Farage on board as part of getting the far right parties in Europe together.
badgerx16 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 18 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Is that a genuine photo or the Wrexham Labour AI one? Much as I loathe the toad-faced grifter, I also loathe AI-generated misinformation wherever it comes from. Clearly badly edited. Farage's right arm is going through Epstein's left armpit. Edited 1 hour ago by badgerx16 1
badgerx16 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: He is mentioned several times in the files released so far. There are exchanges with Bannon and Epstein about having Farage on board as part of getting the far right parties in Europe together. Being mentioned in discussions between 2 other people is not the same as taking part in a discussion personally, or being a direct acquaintance. Jon Stewart is mentioned in one email exchamge, as the potential host of a proposed talk show / podcast format. 1
Weston Super Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Clearly badly edited. Farage's right arm is going through Epstein's left armpit. Isn't that a pocket on his dark shirt?
Gloucester Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Clearly badly edited. Farage's right arm is going through Epstein's left armpit. The background also looks like an artex-ceiling era boomer bungalow’s living room.
sadoldgit Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Being mentioned in discussions between 2 other people is not the same as taking part in a discussion personally, or being a direct acquaintance. Jon Stewart is mentioned in one email exchamge, as the potential host of a proposed talk show / podcast format. Given the time he spends in the US and his allegiance to Trump I would be very surprised if he hasn’t had meetings with Bannon. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/steve-bannon-boasted-about-farage-ties-exchange-epstein Edited 1 hour ago by sadoldgit
badgerx16 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Weston Super Saint said: Isn't that a pocket on his dark shirt? Look along the line between Epstein's shirt and Farage's. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, sadoldgit said: Given the time he spends in the US and his allegiance to Trump I would be very surprised if he hasn’t had meetings with Bannon. He has with Bannon but evidentially that’s nowhere near establishing that Epstein and Farage have had discussions in person. So did the ERG wing of the Tory party on a Bannon visit to Parliament in Trump’s first term when the Brexit saga was going on and no-one is accusing them.
badgerx16 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, sadoldgit said: Given the time he spends in the US and his allegiance to Trump I would be very surprised if he hasn’t had meetings with Bannon. Bannon is not Epstein. Farage has also met Trump, doesn't mean he is anything to do with this mess. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Look along the line between Epstein's shirt and Farage's. That picture is faker than most of Katie Price, which is going some. 1
Farmer Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 14 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: The background also looks like an artex-ceiling era boomer bungalow’s living room. TBF from the photos I've seen of Epstein's place that's what it looked like. 1
whelk Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago (edited) 16 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: That picture is faker than most of Katie Price, which is going some. I wouldn’t be surprised if Epstein bankrolled the Maidstone lunches. Edited 55 minutes ago by whelk Double negative 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: TBF from the photos I've seen of Epstein's place that's what it looked like. Got those ceilings removed from this house professionally as soon as we could. Can’t stand Artex.
Stripey McStripe Shirt Posted 10 minutes ago Posted 10 minutes ago 4 hours ago, tdmickey3 said: Its really galling that this cunt never got his just punishment for his disgusting ways. Hopefully all the vile pieces of shit involved will get theirs. Unfortunately you can pretty much guarantee they won't. If nothing else, these releases have taught us the billionaires and their mates basically dictate the world order and are essentially above the law. They'll probably allow which ever of their mates is the biggest bell end (Mr Andrew Mountbatten Windsor seems the obvious target) to take the brunt and appease the plebs. The likes of Trump will face zero legal consequences their lifetimes. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now