Paul Chuckle Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I think we'll likely hear from Dragon Solak tomorrow and get announcements on various decisions. I don't think the club wants to create any more noise ahead of the game today to give the media more stuff to batter about.
trousers Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, LegalEagle said: I’m starting to wonder whether as a result of the players and Tonda sitting down together (and assuming that the players are happy to work with him - those that are staying) that they’ve made a decision to try and stick with him as they see him as our best bet at getting back up next season. They will use Pannick or an equivalent to fight the FA charges as hard as they can and avoid a ban. A ban - he goes. No ban - he stays. Might be as black and white as that. Which is all well and good, but do we know how long these FA investigations tend to take? How long did they take in 2019 to conclude Bielsa didn't warrant sanctioning, for example? The last thing we need is a substantial period of uncertainty waiting for the FA to get their shit together. One thing's for sure, I bet the FA won't have the same degree of urgency as the recent EFL steamroller... Edited 1 hour ago by trousers
LegalEagle Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 16 minutes ago, Tom & Gerry said: I wish you were right but I think the hostility from fans, not least our own would be too great. We need a Manager now that can bring back some positivity. If the players want him to stay and there is no ban (hard to imagine), would you be hostile towards him? Have to say that I wouldn’t. We win our first 5 games of the season any hostility will quickly vanish. One thing we can say without any doubt is that all of us football fans of any club are all very fickle. 4
Thripp87 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Why is there even a vote? There is less than a 0.1% chance he will even be allowed to stay, and we should be considering it even less then that. 1.) every player currently on the books thinks he’s a cunt. 2.) a large proportion of the fan base think he’s a cunt, on the evidence available so far he is the most culpable for giving us our worst and most embarrassing moment in our 140 year history. 3.) We can't move on it he is here. 4.) Every press conference after a win, did you cheat? 5.) if he is some superstar how fucking stupid will we look when he eventually leaves for a better club, if we stick with him? 1
trousers Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Thripp87 said: every player currently on the books thinks he’s a cunt Source?
Thripp87 Posted 58 minutes ago Posted 58 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, trousers said: Source? Fair comment. On the balance of probability thinks he’s a cunt. 1
trousers Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago (edited) 8 minutes ago, Thripp87 said: if he is some superstar This is a key factor for me... How do we know how much of Tonda's "genius" is down to his spying antics? If the spying is just the icing on the cake, in terms of how good he is, then there's an argument for sticking with him (subject to all the other caveats), but if it's the spying that's the foundation of his managerial ability then he's surely a gonna. Edited 53 minutes ago by trousers
LegalEagle Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago Other thing occurred to me. If at the moment, Parsons, Spoors etc are all in the clear but Tonda knows the truth……….afraid to sack him in case he spills the beans. 2
LegalEagle Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago 6 minutes ago, trousers said: Which is all well and good, but do we know how long these FA investigations tend to take? How long did they take in 2019 to conclude Bielsa didn't warrant sanctioning, for example? The last thing we need is a substantial period of uncertainty waiting for the FA to get their shit together. One thing's for sure, I bet the FA won't have the same degree of urgency as the recent EFL steamroller... Cannot believe the FA will be speedy but might want it tied up before the World Cup or the summer holidays. I assume the club has been given an indication. 1
trousers Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago Just now, Thripp87 said: Fair comment. On the balance of probability thinks he’s a cunt. I'm thinking that if the players had come out against him in unison at the recent meeting with them all and the management, then they'd have sacked him (or suspended him) on the spot, wouldn't they? The fact that there's been no instant action suggests to me that there's a possibility that the players have been convinced to stick by him...?
trousers Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, LegalEagle said: Other thing occurred to me. If at the moment, Parsons, Spoors etc are all in the clear but Tonda knows the truth……….afraid to sack him in case he spills the beans. Aye... More than likely there's a somewhat tangled web at play here... Edited 54 minutes ago by trousers
Lord Duckhunter Posted 51 minutes ago Posted 51 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, LegalEagle said: We win our first 5 games of the season any hostility will quickly vanish What happens if we lose the first 5
Nordic Saint Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago Bielsa was given the FIFA Fair Play Award at the end of his spygate season, followed by the Championship Manager of the Year award the next season, when his Leeds team won the Championship. Yes, there is anew rule now, but all this moralising...
LegalEagle Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Lord Duckhunter said: What happens if we lose the first 5 He gets sacked. If he stays he owes us. His neck will be on the line for a lot if not most of next season if he stays
trousers Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago What happens if everyone starts posting whatabouteries?
trousers Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago Just now, Nordic Saint said: Bielsa was given the FIFA Fair Play Award at the end of his spygate season Please tell me that's not true FFS!
Nordic Saint Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago (edited) 30 minutes ago, trousers said: Please tell me that's not true FFS! Leeds United and Marcelo Bielsa win Fair Play prize at FIFA Football awards for role in Aston Villa game despite 'spygate' row | talkSPORT But, to be fair, Leeds are a bigger club than us, so they can do what they like. If they'd been in our position now, there's no way they'd have been thrown out of the play-off final. They'd have had an ex-Leeds player on the independent commission instead of an ex-Boro one. Edited 17 minutes ago by Nordic Saint
LegalEagle Posted 44 minutes ago Posted 44 minutes ago If he stays I assume he’s still allowed to ‘spy’ so long as it’s more than three days before a game? I assume that the EFL will make this clear to all clubs? Of course they won’t because the EFL are just plain and simple useless.
Lee On Solent Saint Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago Just now, LegalEagle said: If he stays I assume he’s still allowed to ‘spy’ so long as it’s more than three days before a game? I assume that the EFL will make this clear to all clubs? Of course they won’t because the EFL are just plain and simple useless. We should keep well away from any "spying" missions in the future, clubs will be out to get us.
Oldandtired Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago Football wise, spying or no spying we should keep him. If it's true as in the report he bullied junior staff into carrying out nefarious deeds on his behalf then get rid. I detest bullies.
Sheaf Saint Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago 20 minutes ago, trousers said: Which is all well and good, but do we know how long these FA investigations tend to take? How long did they take in 2019 to conclude Bielsa didn't warrant sanctioning, for example? The last thing we need is a substantial period of uncertainty waiting for the FA to get their shit together. One thing's for sure, I bet the FA won't have the same degree of urgency as the recent EFL steamroller... Especially seeing as they've got a world cup to focus on next month. We can't afford to wait for their conclusions - we have to act and be seen clearly to be acting ASAP.
Nordic Saint Posted 36 minutes ago Posted 36 minutes ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, Oldandtired said: Football wise, spying or no spying we should keep him. If it's true as in the report he bullied junior staff into carrying out nefarious deeds on his behalf then get rid. I detest bullies. You'd hate Sir Alex Ferguson then. He could be mean and nasty with youngsters. As for Brian Clough, he would often humiliate them. What you need is a warm, cuddly manager like Russell Martin. Edited 33 minutes ago by Nordic Saint
Whitey Grandad Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago 15 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said: What happens if we lose the first 5 Then he should be sacked now.
Wurzel Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago If he get's a ban it's out of our hands. But everything he done he done to try and win us games. He hasn't bribed referees or other clubs. He han't sent out players with instructions to injure opposing players. I do believe he didn't know it was against the rules to start with, I don't believe that nobody told him it was by the time we played Ipswich and Boro - if they didn't then that's the fault of the club not him. I don't believe spying on the opposition gains more than a tiny advantage if any, what can you really learn? In the Boro case, whether Hackney was fit and we could probably have worked that out when he stepped off the team coach. I don't believe for one minute that he or the club could have envisaged the repurcussions which are far in excess of the "crime" The guy is committed to winning. He's currently on a league 21 match unbeaten run. Not because of spying, mainly due to squad depth, substitutions and fitness. If we got rid of him now and the next boss struggles we'll only be asking ourselves "what if we'd kept him". He's not a fool, he's learnt his lesson. I vote keep him 3
sfc4prem Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Nordic Saint said: You'd hate Sir Alex Ferguson then. He could be mean and nasty with youngsters. Moyes has bullied young Tyler Dibling, too.
Lord Duckhunter Posted 24 minutes ago Posted 24 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, Nordic Saint said: You'd hate Sir Alex Ferguson then. He could be mean and nasty with youngsters. As for Brian Clough, he would often humiliate them. That’s a shame, SAF was my choice to replace Tonda
Lee On Solent Saint Posted 15 minutes ago Posted 15 minutes ago 19 minutes ago, Wurzel said: I do believe he didn't know it was against the rules to start with, I don't believe that nobody told him it was by the time we played Ipswich and Boro Do you also believe in Father Christmas?
Tom & Gerry Posted 2 minutes ago Posted 2 minutes ago 57 minutes ago, LegalEagle said: If the players want him to stay and there is no ban (hard to imagine), would you be hostile towards him? Have to say that I wouldn’t. We win our first 5 games of the season any hostility will quickly vanish. One thing we can say without any doubt is that all of us football fans of any club are all very fickle. A lot of ifs there. If the players all vowed to stay if he stayed then yes, but that's as likely as him not getting a ban. I'd have him back in the future but his career is likely to have moved on by then.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now