Jump to content

trousers

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    56,124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by trousers

  1. I dislike anyone that wears beige trousers. There, I said it.
  2. For example? Cheers (Genuine question)
  3. https://www.virgintrains.co.uk/about/media-room/#/pressreleases/virgin-trains-clarifies-labour-leaders-claim-of-ram-packed-service-1530005
  4. Source?
  5. Cheers! And this one too please kind sir...
  6. Calling the chap on here who seemingly has access to airline passenger lists to confirm which flight he's on. (Can't remember his user name)
  7. This. FFS SO16_Saint. You had a once in a lifetime opportunity to stalk them the whole day and to get a bonefide Saintsweb ITK exclusive of who they are meeting and you flippantly discard the chance just to save your own job? Where's your dedication man....?! p.s. in all seriousness, good effort to get the photo. The amount of times we have people on here saying "I've just seen so and so...." and didn't take a quick snap with their camera phone to prove it. Nice one
  8. Almost as depressing as those who judge and sneer at other's taste in comedy, music, etc...
  9. Btw, Ryan Seager (co-commentator) said earlier that he's not due back from injury until Christmas.
  10. The future's bright...
  11. [emoji38]
  12. Did cross my mind. Barnes looks like a great prospect from what I've seen.
  13. Marcus Barnes injured? Or perhaps now in contention for 1st team squad...?
  14. A question that occurs to me... If the FFP rules are inherently unfair to well run clubs like us who haven't massively overspent on wages before the rules were brought in (thus keeping our starting financial bar below others who overspent), why haven't the club made more of a song and dance about it in public? Surely a public statement from the club along the lines of "We would like to compete competitively in the transfer market with other clubs of our size but the FFP rules prevent us doing so thus rewarding other clubs for historic overspending on wages etc and penalising us for being historically prudent" Why are we not rattling the football authority cages more that we appear to be doing if the rules are not fit for purpose? The only public display of dissatisfaction over the last 5 years has been when Cortese voted against the rules. I appreciate that the authorities are unlikely to change the rules because little ol' Southampton (bless 'em) are getting a bit upset, but what's the harm in trying to stir up a bit of public debate about it? Yours thinking out loudly.
  15. You were actually right some of those seasons....
  16. It happens to the best of us. You're not the first to take a chomp and you won't be the last
  17. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (p.s. chomp chomp chomp)
  18. Decent performance from us. Restricted Utd (probable league winners) to just a few chances. Never a penalty IMO. We're still lacking that killer instinct (as per last few seasons). More positives than negatives. We match on.
  19. Chomp chomp chomp
  20. Never a penalty IMO
  21. Decent half from us. Limited Utd to one or two chances. Fancy us getting a draw out of this.
  22. Chomp chomp chomp
×
×
  • Create New...