Jump to content

Why Hooiveld gets picked.


norwaysaint
 Share

Recommended Posts

There's been lots of talk about Forren not being good enough or just not being ready yet, but more interesting to me is what MP's reasons are for sticking with Hooiveld over everyone else. From what I've seen, even when we're playing well, he's the one who sticks out as not really fitting in with our style. He always seems to be a bit of a championship level clogger. There's nothing wrong with having a big lump in defence, but it just goes against the rest of our style.

 

I thought Fonte had been pretty good this season, but now Hooiveld is clearly preferred. As an experienced centre back, MP must either be seeing something in him, or he might just be the type who thinks a team should have one hard bloke in defence to scare opposition strikers a bit more.

 

Can any of you experts explain it to me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's been lots of talk about Forren not being good enough or just not being ready yet, but more interesting to me is what MP's reasons are for sticking with Hooiveld over everyone else. From what I've seen, even when we're playing well, he's the one who sticks out as not really fitting in with our style. He always seems to be a bit of a championship level clogger. There's nothing wrong with having a big lump in defence, but it just goes against the rest of our style.

 

I thought Fonte had been pretty good this season, but now Hooiveld is clearly preferred. As an experienced centre back, MP must either be seeing something in him, or he might just be the type who thinks a team should have one hard bloke in defence to scare opposition strikers a bit more.

 

Can any of you experts explain it to me?

It's not about "scaring" oppossition strikers, but having a defender that is excellent in the air to deal with those teams that pose such a threat - Hooiveld has been pretty good at that. His distribution is better than many seem to make out, so not really a "clogger" either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's been lots of talk about Forren not being good enough or just not being ready yet, but more interesting to me is what MP's reasons are for sticking with Hooiveld over everyone else. From what I've seen, even when we're playing well, he's the one who sticks out as not really fitting in with our style. He always seems to be a bit of a championship level clogger. There's nothing wrong with having a big lump in defence, but it just goes against the rest of our style.

 

I thought Fonte had been pretty good this season, but now Hooiveld is clearly preferred. As an experienced centre back, MP must either be seeing something in him, or he might just be the type who thinks a team should have one hard bloke in defence to scare opposition strikers a bit more.

 

Can any of you experts explain it to me?

 

Jos has had some good games against certain sides, certain types of player. What he can't handle is fast skilful lumps. In the air

it's passable but on the deck if Fox doesn't cover correctly Jos isn't good enough to bail him out. Sometimes Morgan has gone to that side to sort them out, that works occasionally if the opposition don't have too much in midfield but on Saturday i don't think Morgan was even 100 % fit, didn't Poch change the sides over Cork left, Morgan right ? and Corky didn't have the best of games and was getting into some scrapes .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Form.

 

He's had a fair few ok games and rule one of football management is you don't change a winning team.

 

Shame that applies to just meeting expectations for the previous two games before making mistakes that the rest of the team can't make up for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jos has been pretty good, bar a couple of games. One was on Saturday, but there arent many people who could handle Lukaku, hes just too big and strong.

 

Hes good in the air, and provides a good balance with Yoshi too. They've been doing well, why change it. MP would be a pretty good judge as a defender as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses.

 

It's not a reaction thread after the loss by the way, I missed the last game because of my kid's birthday and I was away when we played Swansea, so most of the times I've seen him, we've been good (and Shaw has played), but he's stuck out like a sore thumb as not really being on the same page as the others. I don't think he's bad, just slightly incongruous with the team. Nice to have a wider view from people who get to the games though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion it is quite simple. Yoshida is better on the right side and is therefore in competition with Fonte. For me Yoshida's all round game is better so gets the nod. Hooiveld is our best CB in the air and covers well doing that. He is not a good Premiership player but adequate to allow us the right balance.

 

It appears Forren, according to someone who was as staplewood this week, needs to build up his muscle bulk and when signed the club indicated he was one for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've played some pretty direct sides of late -Wham, Norwich, Reading, Newcastle etc, so his aerial ability has come in handy. He's deserved his place in the starting line-up.

 

I also think Cork's brilliant form has papered over the cracks in the defense. Take him out and you get a more accurate picture of our CB's ability.

 

Hooiveld cannot deal with players running at him, even Jason bloody Scotland - IMO his forced or unintended substitution against Liverpool was one of the biggest blessings in disguise, one of the main reasons we won the game. The third goal on Saturday epitomised everything: the way Long ran past him was frightening and would not have been out of place in a video game.

 

Even without Saturday's horror show, I would have been in two minds about starting him against a pacey Spurs side. His distribution is not as bad as people say. Bit of a hoofer (like many CBs) but can also hit an exquisite diagonal ball.

 

Lastly, he comes across as bit of a bottler who cracks under pressure. Mistakes pile up with hm, each getting worse than the last and he can be quite quick to start pointing the finger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long's goal was pretty similar of how Lukaku got away from him with ease in the first half, but Boruc saved us.

 

[longs goal] was down to Yoshida diving in and getting made to look a total mug by Lukaku. Fonte used to do that a lot in League 1 but got away with it. Who'd be a centre back these days? Are there 5 world class ones in the whole league?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[longs goal] was down to Yoshida diving in and getting made to look a total mug by Lukaku. Fonte used to do that a lot in League 1 but got away with it. Who'd be a centre back these days? Are there 5 world class ones in the whole league?

 

Vidic is on his day...thats probably it in this league though. It's a lot more difficult being a CB these days though, mainly because everyone plays with full backs who like to push on, leaving the CB's exposed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[longs goal] was down to Yoshida diving in and getting made to look a total mug by Lukaku. Fonte used to do that a lot in League 1 but got away with it. Who'd be a centre back these days? Are there 5 world class ones in the whole league?

 

Very good point. On Saturday the full backs were too bloody close to the strikers. There are days you have to accept the forward is too quick for you to beat head on, so you drop back and at least give yourself half a chance...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hooiveld's worst games also seem to coincide with Fox being in the team. I don't think that's a coincidence. He's not a bad player but obviously having to keep one eye on what Fox is doing, and getting absolutely no support from him when we are under the cosh highlights the weaknesses that Hooiveld has.

 

Or maybe it's just that his better games have been with Shaw in the side as he can concentrate solely on doing his own job.

 

Either way, I think it's pretty safe to say he won't be a first choice CB next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hooiveld's worst games also seem to coincide with Fox being in the team. I don't think that's a coincidence. He's not a bad player but obviously having to keep one eye on what Fox is doing, and getting absolutely no support from him when we are under the cosh highlights the weaknesses that Hooiveld has.

 

Or maybe it's just that his better games have been with Shaw in the side as he can concentrate solely on doing his own job.

 

Either way, I think it's pretty safe to say he won't be a first choice CB next season.

 

If he is, its fair to say that the summer will have been an umitigated catastrophe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And so the Hooiveld brigade have started another brainwashing campaign.

 

The only reason he is playing is because MP wants a left-footed CB and a right-footed CB on the team. Given Forren is having a long integrative period, he is the only one available. That's why he is playing. No more, no less. If we had another left-footed CB or even if Fonte hadn't got injured so early in January he would've been shipped out.

 

And again, pin balling balls back to midfield with your head is not being good in the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is, its fair to say that the summer will have been an umitigated catastrophe.

 

Think this is a bit OTT, 'catastrophe", no, disappointing yes. Talk like this will only serve to cause Alpine to panic when Jos hasn't been replaced by mid June.

 

Sent from my Lumia 800 using Board Express

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fonte was uncomfortable on the left whenever he played there. That means that Yoshida keeps out Fonte and if Hooiveld is injured Yoshida switches to the left to allow Fonte on the right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't undervalue his love of the long ball - when we've been under the kosh and other players look like they're about to pass us into trouble it's normally him who bails us out. There's been a couple of occasions this season where a spell of pressure for the opposition has been calmed by a Hooiveld hoof which Lambert's taken down well.

 

I think he's been okay for us this season. He was very unlucky early on with the own goals and fouls, and that drop in confidence did affect his performance but he's done fine since winning his place back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

 

Ouch !.....I don't consider myself an expert in anything, but I think the simple answer to that question is that Jos is the only player (in his position) to show any grit and determination.

He's no Michael Svensson, but doesn't flinch from tackles, but seldom gets the best of all his opponents.

His yellow card count this season is modest compared with some, and his unfortunate tally of O.G.'s hasn't endeared him to some fans, (though TBF...a couple were unavoidable and not his fault directly).

 

I sincerely hope we can get a better class defender in the summer, but I do feel that Jos' has done his best ...though perhaps it hasn't always been " good enough " on the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was Adkins that was obsessed by that, for most clubs it doesn't matter. Rio Ferdinand and Vidic are both right footed, they've done alright.

 

of course you're right there Turkish, but don't get people thinking that you are comparing our CB's with those two............:scared:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason as far as I can tell is as follows...

 

With our high pressing game a lot of teams short passes get picked up by us as we try to dominate teams. Due to this the opposition teams try more long balls, meaning we need a CB that can win those. That is why in my opinion he is playing.

 

What I said in #9 then!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will be interesting to see how many errors Jos makes tomorrow that result in a direct goalscoring chance for Spurs. I reckon 3.

 

If Shaw is playing the risks will be greatly reduced. If Corky stays on, they'll be reduced even further. Last week was a bit of a confluence of circumstances. Jos is too exposed with Fox on his side.

Edited by Window Cleaner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think this is a bit OTT, 'catastrophe", no, disappointing yes. Talk like this will only serve to cause Alpine to panic when Jos hasn't been replaced by mid June.

 

Sent from my Lumia 800 using Board Express

 

Alpine will most likely panic unless we replace the whole team by June, no attnetion should be paid to it.

 

There has to more to it than the left footed thing, all 3 of our centre-backs plus Fox are now the weakest areas of the team. Yoshida is the most consistent and theres obviously not a lot of difference between Fonte and Hooiveld. I think Jos got in the team whils it has been doing ok and because of this he hasn't lost his place. After the defeat last week we might see some changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Shaw is playing the risks will be greatly reduced. If Corky stays on, they'll be reduced even further. Last week was a bit of a confluence of circumstances. Jos is too exposed with Fox on his side.

 

Indeed. A centre half has to put a lot of legwork in when a full-back's not got back and that doesn't play to Hooiveld's strengths at all. I suspect the reason he's been in under MP is because the opposition players don't have much time to play the ball through midfield - we've certainly been dealing with a lot more aerial balls and that's what Hooiveld can deal with better than Fonte.

 

I think everyone (including the manager) agrees that Hooiveld needs replacing for next season but he really hasn't been that bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will be interesting to see how many errors Jos makes tomorrow that result in a direct goalscoring chance for Spurs. I reckon 3.

 

If you wish hard enough maybe it will come true? If Yoshida makes more tomorrow will you cut Jos some slack?

Edited by Chez
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardly any good CB partnerships are about having a left footer and right footer, but many do have a preferred position regardless, right CB or left CB.

 

Makes sense, given that being reliant on a left-footer reduces the likelihood of finding one by a factor of about 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long's goal was pretty similar of how Lukaku got away from him with ease in the first half, but Boruc saved us.

 

You can't blame centre backs for conceding goals when there's no pressure on the opposing midfield so they can pick a pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will be interesting to see how many errors Jos makes tomorrow that result in a direct goalscoring chance for Spurs. I reckon 3.

 

Thinking back over yesterday I don't think he made any mistakes that led to a goalscoring chance for Spurs - does his rating improve now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking back over yesterday I don't think he made any mistakes that led to a goalscoring chance for Spurs - does his rating improve now?

 

Well there was that ridiculous jump to reach a ball that flew past him that could've let Defoe in hadn't our friend the ref spotted a nonexistent infringement. Had he decided to take two steps back he would've had no problem, but his franticness spoke louder.

 

Having said that, it certainly wasn't a poor game overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...