Donald Trump Appreciation Thread

[badgerx16]

6 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Life experience. Trump has much more of it than this guy.

Cheating, sexual assault, fraud - he sure has "life experience".

Edited November 5 by badgerx16

[Sir Ralph]

9 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Cheating, sexual assault, fraud - he sure has "life experience".

Pointless this isn’t about Trump it’s about the new mayor. You lot are obsessed 

[Weston Super Saint]

2 hours ago, egg said:

If his ideas are great in principle, they should be put into practice. That takes money. Where does that come from without tax revenue? 

Compulsory purchase order?

https://www.trumptowerny.com/

[badgerx16]

17 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Pointless this isn’t about Trump it’s about the new mayor. You lot are obsessed 

You brought up the subject of political experience appropriate to office. And this thread is actually titled "Donald Trump appreciation.....", so yes, it IS about the fat orange dementia suffering man baby.

Edited November 5 by badgerx16

[egg]

21 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Pointless this isn’t about Trump it’s about the new mayor. You lot are obsessed 

He replied to your post about Trump!

[Sir Ralph]

17 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

You brought up the subject of political experience appropriate to office. And this thread is actually titled "Donald Trump appreciation.....", so yes, it IS about the fat orange dementia suffering man baby.

Do you know what the experience of mamdani is?

Edited November 5 by Sir Ralph

[Sir Ralph]

3 minutes ago, egg said:

He replied to your post about Trump!

Because one of you mentioned Trump. I said this hasn’t got anything to do with him. But the band of brothers is obsessed with him. The point is this guy is an inexperienced socialist. Nobody has given any credible reason why he is appropriate for this job. Just Trump blah blah

Edited November 5 by Sir Ralph

[badgerx16]

25 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Do you know what the experience of mamdani is?

He worked for 2 NY politicians and was then elected as a State assembly member, so more relevant experience than Trump.

[badgerx16]

28 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Because one of you mentioned Trump.

The fucking thread title mentions Trump. He is the reason the thread exists.

[whelk]

31 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Nobody has given any credible reason why he is appropriate for this job

You know how elections work, yes?

[badgerx16]

34 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

 Nobody has given any credible reason why he is appropriate for this job. 

Can you guess who else this comment might have been aimed at ?

[The Kraken]

Is there ever a day this fella doesn’t make a plum of himself on here?

[badgerx16]

Charlie Sheen speaking of meeting Donnie;

I held a party at one of Trump's venues, and he was there. He came over to say hello, and said he wanted to give me a present. He walked away and came back a while later with a pair of designer cufflinks.

"These are solid platinum and diamonds" Trump said.

"I couldn't possibly accept these".

"Please take them. My gift to you"

 

Some time later we were having some jewellery valued. After the assessor had finished she got up to leave.

"Hang on, I have one more item".

I went and got the Trump cufflinks, "These are platinum and diamonds" I told her.

After about 4 seconds of looking at them she screwed her face up with disgust: " These are cheap pewter and zirconias" she said.

[skintsaint]

[skintsaint]

 

Edited Tuesday at 00:34 by skintsaint

[badgerx16]

Epstein emails rroeased by Democrats on the Oversight Committee;

 

[Sir Ralph]

33 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Epstein emails rroeased by Democrats on the Oversight Committee;

 

If he did anything it will come out in the wash and if this is a Prince Andrew mark 2 he desrves to be punished. The point is the victim, Victoria Guiffre is now dead but said that Trump had limited interaction with her and was only ever nice to her. How do you provide something if would be accuser is dead and said he didnt do anything in her book? If more evidence is released which categorically evidences otherwise but its going to have to be very strong if the would be accuser has said otherwise.

https://www.newsweek.com/virginia-giuffre-said-donald-trump-bill-clinton-book-nobodys-girl-10917361

Edited Wednesday at 16:49 by Sir Ralph

[sadoldgit]

On 06/11/2025 at 23:07, skintsaint said:

I’m surprised that nic didn’t find this funny. A guy collapsed in the Oval Office and whilst others rushed to help him, Trump just wanted to carry on with his briefing and seemed displeased that he was no longer the centre of attention. Must have been worth a laughing emoji surely nic?

[badgerx16]

12 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

If he did anything it will come out in the wash and if this is a Prince Andrew mark 2 he desrves to be punished. The point is the victim, Victoria Guiffre is now dead but said that Trump had limited interaction with her and was only ever nice to her. How do you provide something if would be accuser is dead and said he didnt do anything in her book? If more evidence is released which categorically evidences otherwise but its going to have to be very strong if the would be accuser has said otherwise.

https://www.newsweek.com/virginia-giuffre-said-donald-trump-bill-clinton-book-nobodys-girl-10917361

Guiffre was not the only victim.

[Sir Ralph]

22 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Guiffre was not the only victim.

At the moment I've only seen Guiffre mentioned in relation to Trump. I havent read much though - where have the press said that these latest emails released potentially bring into question if Trump was involved with other Epstein victims, other than Guiffre?
 

I'm not saying you are wrong but I havent seen it so it’s a genuine question

 

Edited Wednesday at 17:22 by Sir Ralph

[badgerx16]

13 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

At the moment I've only seen Guiffre mentioned in relation to Trump. I havent read much though - where have the press said that these latest emails released potentially bring into question if Trump was involved with other Epstein victims, other than Guiffre?
 

I'm not saying you are wrong but I havent seen it.

 

The names are redacted.

Now that the new Democrat Reprsentative from Arizona has been sworn in there will be a vote on the full release of the files.

[Sir Ralph]

7 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

The names are redacted.

Now that the new Democrat Reprsentative from Arizona has been sworn in there will be a vote on the full release of the files.

Yes so the evidence to date doesn’t really do anything in respect of Trump. You have an email from Epstein referring to Trump and Guiffre spending some time together with no specifics but Guifree said they did meet and nothing happened and he was nice to her.

That could change with the release of the new files and I don’t know if it will. However to date, based on evidence available, there doesn’t seem much of relevance to Trump so I’m not sure why everyone is getting excited…..yet.

It either a cover up attempt by the WH or a smeer campaign by the Democrats 

Edited Wednesday at 17:32 by Sir Ralph

[badgerx16]

3 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

Yes so the evidence to date doesn’t really do anything in respect of Trump. You have an email from Epstein referring to Trump and Guiffre spending some time together with no specifics but Guifree said they did meet and nothing happened and he was nice to her.

That could change with the release of the new files and I don’t know if it will. However to date, based on evidence available, there doesn’t seem much of relevance to Trump so I’m not sure why everyone is getting excited…..yet

Those emails do not mention Guiffre. What they do is contradict Trump's claims about when he 'disowned' Epstein, that Epstein has some sort of hold over Trump, and infer he knew about the girls and Maxwell's involvement with them.

Edited Wednesday at 17:35 by badgerx16

[Sir Ralph]

4 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Those emails do not mention Guiffre.

The WH have said in a press conference that hers is the redacted name. For them to explicitly say that and it to be incorrect would be a major major cover up, which would very quickly be shown to be so as the emails have been released.  I’d be very surprised on that basis if the WH was lying. 
 

Remember the Democrats redacted the names knowing what Guiffre said about Trump.

Edited Wednesday at 17:37 by Sir Ralph

[badgerx16]

13 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

The WH have said in a press conference that hers is the redacted name. For them to explicitly say that and it to be incorrect would be a major major cover up, which would very quickly be shown to be so as the emails have been released.  I’d be very surprised on that basis if the WH was lying. 
 

Remember the Democrats redacted the names knowing what Guiffre said about Trump.

I think the other points may be more dangerous to him.

[sadoldgit]

Absolutely zero respect for any judicial system in any country (especially his own). Apparently the laws and rules don’t apply to him and his cronies.

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trump-asks-israels-president-to-pardon-netanyahu-from-corruption-charges-e2cfcee3

[Farmer Saint]

If be very surprised if the WH was lying, mainly because they don't have previous for lying...

[LVSaint]

3 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

Yes so the evidence to date doesn’t really do anything in respect of Trump. You have an email from Epstein referring to Trump and Guiffre spending some time together with no specifics but Guifree said they did meet and nothing happened and he was nice to her.

That could change with the release of the new files and I don’t know if it will. However to date, based on evidence available, there doesn’t seem much of relevance to Trump so I’m not sure why everyone is getting excited…..yet.

It either a cover up attempt by the WH or a smeer campaign by the Democrats 

[Sir Ralph]

As I suggested was probably the case, the WH wouldn’t have made this up and the unredacted document says it was Guiffre.

 

Edited Wednesday at 21:48 by Sir Ralph

[sadoldgit]

So the White House are now suggesting that we all watch GB News rather than the BBC.

https://www.indy100.com/politics/karoline-leavitt-bbc-gb-news-tim-davie-trump#

[benjii]

6 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

As I suggested was probably the case, the WH wouldn’t have made this up and the unredacted document says it was Guiffre.

 

Anyone care to ask him what he was doing for hours at Epstein's house with a sex-trafficking victim?

[JohnnyShearer2.0]

2 hours ago, benjii said:

Anyone care to ask him what he was doing for hours at Epstein's house with a sex-trafficking victim?

Playing whack a mole?

[revolution saint]

15 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

  I’d be very surprised on that basis if the WH was lying. 
 

 

They claim they won the 2020 election without any evidence of voter fraud.  Personally find it hilarious that they're claiming the democrats are creating a "false narrative" - fuck me, that's all Trump ever does.  Fake news anyone?

[east-stand-nic]

16 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

I’m surprised that nic didn’t find this funny. A guy collapsed in the Oval Office and whilst others rushed to help him, Trump just wanted to carry on with his briefing and seemed displeased that he was no longer the centre of attention. Must have been worth a laughing emoji surely nic?

Another own goal from you here. Firstly, if you watch the video of these events you will see he did go over to assist and then sensibly left it to the first aid experts. Had he have been all over the bloke you would have them complained he was in the way of said first aiders. You are an utter fool.

I note with interest you stopped replying to my posts the other day on the other thread and refused to answer ALL my questions yet again. 

[tdmickey3]

5 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Another own goal from you here. Firstly, if you watch the video of these events you will see he did go over to assist and then sensibly left it to the first aid experts. Had he have been all over the bloke you would have them complained he was in the way of said first aiders. You are an utter fool.

I note with interest you stopped replying to my posts the other day on the other thread and refused to answer ALL my questions yet again. 

Its because you are stupid, how many more times do you have to be told?

[sadoldgit]

2 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

Another own goal from you here. Firstly, if you watch the video of these events you will see he did go over to assist and then sensibly left it to the first aid experts. Had he have been all over the bloke you would have them complained he was in the way of said first aiders. You are an utter fool.

I note with interest you stopped replying to my posts the other day on the other thread and refused to answer ALL my questions yet again. 

So everyone else in the frame were first aid experts. He was the only one there who wasn’t so he toodled off to carry on as before? Ok. Maybe he could have picked up the phone and called for the para medics or something?

I told you before that I don’t read all of your posts as you really can’t be taken seriously. You don’t answer anyone else's questions, including mine. It’s a bit rich when you have a go at others and me for not answering yours. Even when I do you don’t seem to understand basic English or are deliberately obtuse.

You are a Trump and Farage apologist which not only makes you a bigger fool, but makes you a total twat.

[east-stand-nic]

2 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

So everyone else in the frame were first aid experts. He was the only one there who wasn’t so he toodled off to carry on as before? Ok. Maybe he could have picked up the phone and called for the para medics or something?

I told you before that I don’t read all of your posts as you really can’t be taken seriously. You don’t answer anyone else's questions, including mine. It’s a bit rich when you have a go at others and me for not answering yours. Even when I do you don’t seem to understand basic English or are deliberately obtuse.

You are a Trump and Farage apologist which not only makes you a bigger fool, but makes you a total twat.

So, why bring me into things if you don't like what I have to say? Outed again. 😂

[sadoldgit]

3 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

Another own goal from you here. Firstly, if you watch the video of these events you will see he did go over to assist and then sensibly left it to the first aid experts. Had he have been all over the bloke you would have them complained he was in the way of said first aiders. You are an utter fool.

I note with interest you stopped replying to my posts the other day on the other thread and refused to answer ALL my questions yet again. 

😂

I have just seen the whole video clip of the incident. He did not, as you say, “go over to assist.” He stood up when the guy collapsed, looked to his left when then he looked to the front again with a vacant expression on his face. At no point did he move towards the man….he just looked.

How do you know that the people around him were all medically trained?

Another own goal from the forum Trump apologist and utter fool, nutty nic.

Edited 13 hours ago by sadoldgit

[badgerx16]

12 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

😂

I have just seen the whole video clip of the incident. He did not, as you say, “go over to assist.” He stood up when the guy collapsed, looked to his left when then he looked to the front again with a vacant expression on his face. At no point did he move towards the man….he just looked.

Another own goal from the forum Trump apologist and utter fool, nutty nic.

Aaah, but how do you know the video wasn't edited, or manipulated by AI, to remove the images of The Great Leader demonstrating his undoubted humanitarian concern for the chap that fainted ?

There is, after all, a huge MSM conspiracy taking place here. Nic, through his underground counter-culture MATRIX resistance contacts, has access to the original, unadulterated source material.

Edited 13 hours ago by badgerx16

[east-stand-nic]

30 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

😂

I have just seen the whole video clip of the incident. He did not, as you say, “go over to assist.” He stood up when the guy collapsed, looked to his left when then he looked to the front again with a vacant expression on his face. At no point did he move towards the man….he just looked.

How do you know that the people around him were all medically trained?

Another own goal from the forum Trump apologist and utter fool, nutty nic.

Dear me, using the old edited BBC version huh. Clearly in the full coverage you could see Dr went over right away and at least 5 others stood watching, not just Trump, but you do not mention that. Later when the Dr. had done his thing Trump walked over, bent down and asked if all was OK, factamundo. But of course likely this had been edited. Fact of the matter was the Dr was there and went right in, so sensible people stood back to give him time and space to do his job, the right thing to do would you not say? No. You won't because any little thing in the world you can find to try and berate him, you will. Yet Starmer is tearing the UK apart and he can do no wrong in your eyes. Sick evil Pious old fool. 

18 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Aaah, but how do you know the video wasn't edited, or manipulated by AI, to remove the images of The Great Leader demonstrating his undoubted humanitarian concern for the chap that fainted ?

There is, after all, a huge MSM conspiracy taking place here. Nic, through his underground counter-culture MATRIX resistance contacts, has access to the original, unadulterated source material.

See above wankpot. 

 

Oh dear, what an evil man: https://www.newsweek.com/man-passed-out-collapse-oval-office-update-trump-11010528

 

"And he talked to her and got her much calmer than I could have ever done. And I just think he's just a wonderful human being that he would take time. He could have gone off and done ten other things. But he actually cared that the wife of a man who he has never met before felt in a safer place."

Outed yet again, OMG how many times. 

Edited 13 hours ago by east-stand-nic

[tdmickey3]

24 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Dear me, using the old edited BBC version huh. Clearly in the full coverage you could see Dr went over right away and at least 5 others stood watching, not just Trump, but you do not mention that. Later when the Dr. had done his thing Trump walked over, bent down and asked if all was OK, factamundo. But of course likely this had been edited. Fact of the matter was the Dr was there and went right in, so sensible people stood back to give him time and space to do his job, the right thing to do would you not say? No. You won't because any little thing in the world you can find to try and berate him, you will. Yet Starmer is tearing the UK apart and he can do no wrong in your eyes. Sick evil Pious old fool. 

See above wankpot. 

 

Oh dear, what an evil man: https://www.newsweek.com/man-passed-out-collapse-oval-office-update-trump-11010528

 

"And he talked to her and got her much calmer than I could have ever done. And I just think he's just a wonderful human being that he would take time. He could have gone off and done ten other things. But he actually cared that the wife of a man who he has never met before felt in a safer place."

Outed yet again, OMG how many times. 

Hahahahahahaha 

[badgerx16]

47 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Dear me, using the old edited BBC version huh. Clearly in the full coverage you could see Dr went over right away and at least 5 others stood watching, not just Trump, but you do not mention that. Later when the Dr. had done his thing Trump walked over, bent down and asked if all was OK, factamundo. But of course likely this had been edited. Fact of the matter was the Dr was there and went right in, so sensible people stood back to give him time and space to do his job, the right thing to do would you not say? No. You won't because any little thing in the world you can find to try and berate him, you will. Yet Starmer is tearing the UK apart and he can do no wrong in your eyes. Sick evil Pious old fool. 

See above wankpot. 

 

Oh dear, what an evil man: https://www.newsweek.com/man-passed-out-collapse-oval-office-update-trump-11010528

 

"And he talked to her and got her much calmer than I could have ever done. And I just think he's just a wonderful human being that he would take time. He could have gone off and done ten other things. But he actually cared that the wife of a man who he has never met before felt in a safer place."

Outed yet again, OMG how many times.

More "out"ing than a hack of GRINDR.

 

Nic,you are a fucking crackpot halfwit. The sooner you recognise this and accept it, the calmer and happier you will be.

Edited 12 hours ago by badgerx16

[sadoldgit]

2 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

Dear me, using the old edited BBC version huh. Clearly in the full coverage you could see Dr went over right away and at least 5 others stood watching, not just Trump, but you do not mention that. Later when the Dr. had done his thing Trump walked over, bent down and asked if all was OK, factamundo. But of course likely this had been edited. Fact of the matter was the Dr was there and went right in, so sensible people stood back to give him time and space to do his job, the right thing to do would you not say? No. You won't because any little thing in the world you can find to try and berate him, you will. Yet Starmer is tearing the UK apart and he can do no wrong in your eyes. Sick evil Pious old fool. 

See above wankpot. 

 

Oh dear, what an evil man: https://www.newsweek.com/man-passed-out-collapse-oval-office-update-trump-11010528

 

"And he talked to her and got her much calmer than I could have ever done. And I just think he's just a wonderful human being that he would take time. He could have gone off and done ten other things. But he actually cared that the wife of a man who he has never met before felt in a safer place."

Outed yet again, OMG how many times. 

Be honest nic, you haven’t actually seen it have you? Which one of the 3 people standing next to him who all went to his aid was the doctor? 😂 All of the people standing close to him did what the rest of us would do, all apart from Donny who did, eventually, the bare minimum and asked how he was. You have read a post from another MAGA disciple and taken their word for what happened.
By the way, when you finally see the clip you will hear him say he has made cuts of 1000% and 1200%. Does it worry you at all that the most powerful man on the planet has a lesser grasp of basic maths than a plant pot.

The only thing that Trump cares about is Trump. Occasionally he will remember to do something that narcissists don’t do, but only occasionally. Like the rest of us, you see this man in the media day after day, but you make apologies for how vile he is. Why is that?

As for Starmer, I have criticised him before and will criticise him again. Not for the first time you take something, run it through the nutty nic filter, and pass it out the other end like something you would find in rivers from Southern Water.

Starmer still has time to turn things around, but at the moment he is one of the main reasons that Remain are doing well in the polls. If Farage becomes the next PM I will lay most of the blame at the feet of Starmer and Labour’s policies just as I laid the blame with Clegg for letting the Tories screw over the country (and I had been a LidDem voter for years at the time - I haven’t voted for them since).

I have made this as clear as I can but I appreciate that you have a cognitive problem with plain English, so maybe find a small child to explain it to you, wankpot 😂

Edited 10 hours ago by sadoldgit

[influx]

4 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

More "out"ing than a hack of GRINDR.

 

Nic,you are a fucking crackpot halfwit. The sooner you recognise this and accept it, the calmer and happier you will be.

But he knows the trOoTH.    Someone should take his YouTube access away