Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Turkish said:

They’re just about to get 7 weeks off on full pay the lazy cunts they don’t need a whip round 

In the old days they would be prepping for lessons whereas advances in AI must make this a piece of piss

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, whelk said:

In the old days they would be prepping for lessons whereas advances in AI must make this a piece of piss

We bumped into my songs Religious studies teacher at the airport last time we went on holiday, fit as fuck no wonder he’s doing well in it

Edited by Turkish
Posted
43 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Meh. We used to drink it all the time round my mates house in Poulton in the early noughties 😎

But did you venture north of Victoria Road in Cleveleys ?

Posted
17 hours ago, Turkish said:

We bumped into my songs Religious studies teacher at the airport last time we went on holiday, fit as fuck no wonder he’s doing well in it

Religious Studies FFS!. I remember in one of those lessons when I was told by the teacher that I was 'a blasphemer'. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, iansums said:

Religious Studies FFS!. I remember in one of those lessons when I was told by the teacher that I was 'a blasphemer'. 

Its a compulsory GCSE subject as his school which i was surprised about as it isnt a faith school. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Local Government reorganisation; the Government are proposing a proper fuck-up in rearranging the Councils in Lancashire.

Wait until they get the green light from the King of the North to set their own council tax increases :facepalm:

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

Local Government reorganisation; the Government are proposing a proper fuck-up in rearranging the Councils in Lancashire.

Same in Hampshire- going to cost an absolute fortune and far as I can see no real benefit. And Labour have done no cost of change analysis just wouldn’t it be good if changed a boundary here and there 

Seems a text book exercise on pissing away tax payers money on the basis of proposals not fully assessed and thought through.

Edited by whelk
  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, whelk said:

Same in Hampshire- going to cost an absolute fortune and far as I can see no real benefit. And Labour have done no cost of change analysis just wouldn’t it be good if changed a boundary here and there 

Seems a text book exercise on pissing away tax payers money on the basis of proposals not fully assessed and thought through.

Depends on which area and who is asked. Gloucestershire 6 LAs to roll into 1, making England’s third biggest LA overall. Positive cross-party support although the Reform Leader here made some surprisingly articulate comments about the ambitious timescale and people probably at risk of redundancy having to carry out the transition. Gloucester CC less happy by far.

Devon where my folks live mixed, Exeter, Plymouth and Torbay quite happy with it, Devon CC furious.

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Depends on which area and who is asked. Gloucestershire 6 LAs to roll into 1, making England’s third biggest LA overall. Positive cross-party support although the Reform Leader here made some surprisingly articulate comments about the ambitious timescale and people probably at risk of redundancy having to carry out the transition. Gloucester CC less happy by far.

Devon where my folks live mixed, Exeter, Plymouth and Torbay quite happy with it, Devon CC furious.

Rural Devonian (adopted) here... Yep, most people outside the three conurbations are scratching their heads this morning (to put it politely).

It's absolutely nothing to do with Labour attempting to seize control of key areas, rather than doing what's best for residents, of course... ;)

 

FB_IMG_1784224064338.jpg

Edited by trousers
Posted
8 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Proof the pudding will be in the eating I suppose (getting the phrase right to Hypo’s satisfaction).

It’ll probably be about saving money as it has been for 16 years. 

Isn't one of the drivers supposed to be about rolling up all the individual LGPS schemes into fewer larger ones and then incentivising them to invest in UK businesses?  Thought I read that somewhere but could be wrong.  Far as I'm concerned it's a shit idea and I don't like it.  I don't want a sodding Mayor either.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, revolution saint said:

Isn't one of the drivers supposed to be about rolling up all the individual LGPS schemes into fewer larger ones and then incentivising them to invest in UK businesses?  Thought I read that somewhere but could be wrong.  Far as I'm concerned it's a shit idea and I don't like it.  I don't want a sodding Mayor either.

These things always go in cycles of gradual centralisation followed by explosive decentralisation into much smaller units. It's the story of the universe. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

These things always go in cycles of gradual centralisation followed by explosive decentralisation into much smaller units. It's the story of the universe. 

Yep, remember the Marmot Review late 00s and early 10s being a big thing eg localism.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

It’ll probably be about saving money as it has been for 16 years. 

Given there is little overlap in services between county councils and districts there isn't a lot of scope for de-duplication other than in areas such as HR administration, and most councils are already cut to the bone on staffing, ( despite what some media sources might tell you ). Also, the transition costs will be way higher than they will admit to, as they were in the 1990s version of LGR.

The big mistake in this current round, imo, is that the new authorities are being stitched together along the boundaries of the existing districts, rather than looking to create new more logical units drawn on effectively a blank canvass. In our case, Dolphinholme in the Forest of Bowland, is split between Wyre and Lancaster councils because the river running through it is the Borough boundary. The new authority layout merges Wyre with Blackpool, and will inevitably tend to focus things westwards towards Blackpool, which has very little in common with the areas towards the M6 and further east. It would make much more sense to make a new boundary west of the A6 and put Doplhinholne and it's surroundings totally within Lancaster, which is the nearest major centre. But then again, this was never about making sense.

It's not as if the new authorities would even match the Parliamentary boundaries. There is no logic to the proposal whatsoever.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...