Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
44 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Surely that excludes those who identify as cats, unicorns, or elves. Would "Something in water" be less controversial ?

As usual, this is just ragebait bollocks. If you go to the source, you will find that they state "person in water" is a more inclusive term, but:

"currently, the term 'man overboard' still exists within electronic equipment, software and official documents produced by governing bodies. The important point is to be able to raise an alarm where a person has fallen overboard to initiate the emergency procedures. Until this is able to change, it would be recommended to continue to use the term 'man overboard' when following safety procedures"

The guide itself was created by the RYA in response to a high volume of requests for one from their affiliated clubs and recognised training centres.

So whatever that source is, it's disingenuous.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

Surely that excludes those who identify as cats, unicorns, or elves. Would "Something in water" be less controversial ?

Then everyone leans over the side to help, only to find your "something in the water" call referred to Jaws. 

Lots of icey stares from the survivors after that.

Posted

I see my stalker thinks this sort of thing is far more important than tackling knife crime, rape or murder. Cannot say as I am surprised by that as he is clearly all for those things. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said:

I see my stalker thinks this sort of thing is far more important than tackling knife crime, rape or murder. Cannot say as I am surprised by that as he is clearly all for those things. 

Accusing anyone of that proves to all that you are a cunt .

Only someone without an ounce of intelligence would post that

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

Accusing anyone of that proves to all that you are a cunt .

Only someone without an ounce of intelligence would post that

You have said similar and worse to me many times. So suck it up snowflake. Care to explain why you would post a lol emoji on what I said then? I mean, surely anyone against what I mentioned would not laugh at the statement would they? 

Looks like you are tied up in knots again. 

Edited by east-stand-nic
  • Haha 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Fucking hell…. Who would vote for this loon? 
 

 

The Greens seem to have lost the 'environ-' and just gone full on 'mental'.

Edited by badgerx16
Posted
28 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

The Greens seem to have lost the 'environ-' and just gone full on 'mental'.

It will win them a load of attention and votes and make them completely unelectable. Arguably they weren't looking to get elected anyway, simply to act as a pressure group so from that perspective they are successful.

Posted
6 minutes ago, pingpong said:

Fucking hell, who watches this shite gotcha journalism seriously?

 

May I ask, do you believe a woman can have a penis?

Posted

To be fair, Moron just seems like a cunt and Polanski seems like a very straight forward guy trying to have a conversation. 

Posted (edited)
On 12/10/2025 at 05:53, benjii said:

To be fair, Moron just seems like a cunt and Polanski seems like a very straight forward guy trying to have a conversation. 

This is the original article, only 12 years old.  Maybe he could growth or remove people's manhoods too? If he doesnt believe in basic facts I suppose anything is possible in his  world....

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/798031/can-you-really-think-your-boobs-bigger/

Edited by Sir Ralph
Posted

Remarkable decline of young people in America identifying as trans with the number halving in two years. It's almost like it was all a trend and a social contagion after all for the vast majority. Anyone pushing drugs and surgeries on these people need locking up.

20251014_233904.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Remarkable decline of young people in America identifying as trans with the number halving in two years. It's almost like it was all a trend and a social contagion after all for the vast majority. Anyone pushing drugs and surgeries on these people need locking up.

20251014_233904.jpg

That graph doesn't show any identifiable drop in people identifying as trans, and certainly not halving.  

It shows the share of students not identifying as male or female.

That's not the same thing at all.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 15/10/2025 at 00:23, pingpong said:

That graph doesn't show any identifiable drop in people identifying as trans, and certainly not halving.  

It shows the share of students not identifying as male or female.

That's not the same thing at all.

 

 

Poor old hypo, you have to wonder if there is a minority group left that he isn’t phobic about.

Posted
On 15/10/2025 at 00:23, pingpong said:

That graph doesn't show any identifiable drop in people identifying as trans, and certainly not halving.  

It shows the share of students not identifying as male or female.

That's not the same thing at all.

 

 

Here you go.

20251021_093325.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

Who could possibly have guessed.

The ones who took pubery blockers, had sex changes or who were told they were in the wrong body but twisted individuals?

Posted
37 minutes ago, Turkish said:

The ones who took pubery blockers, had sex changes or who were told they were in the wrong body but twisted individuals?

Thankfully many of these people who said they were trans did it for attention and most made no changes beyond a bit of makeup and clothing. The ones who took puberty blockers or had surgery are the ones who have had permanent alterations done and will rightly feel devastated by the choices the adults in their lives made. They were meant to protect them. It's a tragic situation all round but I hope any medical professionals involved are jailed for a long time.

Posted
25 minutes ago, swannymere said:

 Wouldn't the culture war happening in the US and elsewhere make people less like to identify if it means they're going to be persecuted?

I thought they all were persecuted anyway? We've been told for the last 10 years or so since it became a thing that it was so hard to be who they really are because they dont have safe spaces, get made fun of etc etc. 

I wouldn't have thought it would have made any difference?

Posted
1 hour ago, swannymere said:

True, just been amped up to 11 by various groups who need feel the need to punch down; i don't get it.

I find that phrase very odd. When you have institutions like the NHS rowing in behind this stuff to the point that women are forced to change in the presence of a biological man, how is that lacking power? Until recently did you see the annual accounts of Stonewall and the amount of big businesses lining up behind gender ideology? 

It's not actually about punching anyone- metaphorically or otherwise-for many it is about protecting children and young people who don't know any better from doing irreversible harms to themselves in order to chase a fantasy that doesn't exist.

Posted
2 hours ago, swannymere said:

 If you think trans women are the issue with regards to children and women wait till i introdue you to biological men.

There's loads of issues with children and women. Trans ideology and the real world harm that has been done to children because of it is one issue and it involves both men and women (oh and of course trans women are biological men.)

Posted
3 hours ago, swannymere said:

 If you think trans women are the issue with regards to children and women wait till i introdue you to biological men.

A trans woman is a biological man, and in some cases they are being allowed to use women's spaces. That's kind of the point.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...