What Is Happening To Our Country?

[sadoldgit]

7 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Calm down, it’s hardly crime of the century.

I didn’t say it was. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy. But then you know that.

[AlexLaw76]

15 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

I didn’t say it was. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy. But then you know that.

are we being told to shut up for the sake of diversity. Also, is my life in danger if I draw a cartoon of Jesus?

[benjii]

On 20/02/2026 at 04:28, revolution saint said:

I’m thinking of going on holiday abroad. Main criteria is a current monarchy, any recommendations? 

Brunei. Kuwait. Spain.

[sadoldgit]

42 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

are we being told to shut up for the sake of diversity. Also, is my life in danger if I draw a cartoon of Jesus?

Remind me again how many people are in jail for grooming and raping young girls?

When the flag shaggers were busy rioting and burning down hotels it was on the basis of false information circulating on the internet. There are countless instances of sex crimes being covered up by the Church but not a peep out of you and the flag shaggers. Tell me, why is that?

Could it be because they are not foreigners by any chance?

Edited 5 hours ago by sadoldgit
Typo

[Lord Duckhunter]

12 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Remind me again how many people are in jail for grooming and raping young girls?

Not enough. 

[Holmes_and_Watson]

15 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Remind me again how many people are in jail for grooming and raping young girls?

When the flag shaggers were busy rioting and burning down hotels it was on the basis of false information circulating on the internet. There are countless instances of sex crimes being covered up by the Church but not a peep out of you and the flag shaggers. Tell me, why is that?

Could it be because they are not foreigners by any chance?

I hope none of them acted after you fabricated racially motivated damage to a car, and then blamed your wife for it.

[AlexLaw76]

27 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Remind me again how many people are in jail for grooming and raping young girls?

 

No where near enough, let alone the scale we were told to shut up and let the kids get raped for the sake of 'diversity'....

How is the Batley school teacher getting on...still alive I hope.

[sadoldgit]

5 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

No where near enough, let alone the scale we were told to shut up and let the kids get raped for the sake of 'diversity'....

How is the Batley school teacher getting on...still alive I hope.

“We” were told to shut up? Who is “we?” There were plenty of people who weren’t shutting up. Did you read the reports? Given that you only focus on one thing I’m guessing not. They found that there were multiple reasons why these matters weren’t dealt with properly at the time. Still, it suits your purpose just to focus on “diversity” and it is pretty obvious why that is.

It cuts both ways. Do you think that the Stephen Lawrence murder was handled well for example?

Child sexual abuse is clearly an abhorrence. It shouldn’t really matter what colour skin or what religion the perpetrators have. You only seem to get agitated by those with brown skins or Muslims. You won’t be surprised to hear that sexual abuse of children in the Christian church goes back way before immigration became an issue and there are still reports of cover ups. Perhaps you should spend as much time getting wound up about those too?

[Lord Duckhunter]

29 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Do you think that the Stephen Lawrence murder was handled well for example?

Not until the Daily Mail named the culprits, no. 

[Lord Duckhunter]

31 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

We” were told to shut up? Who is “we?” There were plenty of people who weren’t shutting up.

Unfortunately, you weren’t one of them. “Hardly crime of the century” was your analysis…

[east-stand-nic]

35 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

“We” were told to shut up? Who is “we?” There were plenty of people who weren’t shutting up. Did you read the reports? Given that you only focus on one thing I’m guessing not. They found that there were multiple reasons why these matters weren’t dealt with properly at the time. Still, it suits your purpose just to focus on “diversity” and it is pretty obvious why that is.

It cuts both ways. Do you think that the Stephen Lawrence murder was handled well for example?

Child sexual abuse is clearly an abhorrence. It shouldn’t really matter what colour skin or what religion the perpetrators have. You only seem to get agitated by those with brown skins or Muslims. You won’t be surprised to hear that sexual abuse of children in the Christian church goes back way before immigration became an issue and there are still reports of cover ups. Perhaps you should spend as much time getting wound up about those too?

And you have never condemned a Muslim attack of any kind and that is a fact. You are sick and vile in the way you view things. 

[trousers]

Saintsweb before the invention of the internet:

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by trousers

[sadoldgit]

42 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

And you have never condemned a Muslim attack of any kind and that is a fact. You are sick and vile in the way you view things. 

And you bring the level of debate on this forum to a constant low. I have condemned sex crimes committed by all, yes, including Muslims. You only seem bothered by sex crimes committed by immigrants. A simple bit of research will show you that most sex crimes are committed by the indigenous males, but hey, continue to focus on one group because it suits your agenda.

For someone with a supposed huge intellect you really are quite dense.

[sadoldgit]

51 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Unfortunately, you weren’t one of them. “Hardly crime of the century” was your analysis…

I assume you are referring to my comment about Hew Edwards as that is the only time I used that phrase.

It was based on the fact that the BBC had run the story as the main feature several nights in a row. It seemed like overkill given that it wasn’t actually the crime of the century and probably wasn’t the biggest news story every day of that week.

For a bit of perspective - put these three crimes in order of seriousness (hint, two of them are always tried in a Crown Court due to the level of seriousness).

Found in possession of indecent pictures of children.

Rape.

Murder.

Another clue. As far as we know, Edwards did not rape or murder anyone.

[sadoldgit]

54 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

And you have never condemned a Muslim attack of any kind and that is a fact. You are sick and vile in the way you view things. 

Every few weeks you make exactly the same claim and every few weeks you are just as wrong and deluded as you were before. Do you get off on making yourself look stupid on a daily basis?

[east-stand-nic]

42 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

And you bring the level of debate on this forum to a constant low. I have condemned sex crimes committed by all, yes, including Muslims. You only seem bothered by sex crimes committed by immigrants. A simple bit of research will show you that most sex crimes are committed by the indigenous males, but hey, continue to focus on one group because it suits your agenda.

For someone with a supposed huge intellect you really are quite dense.

Factually you have never once joined in condemning any Muslim attacks. Each and every time all you do is try to divert their wrong doings by saying whites do it more. You have the agenda, not us. You seem hell bent on protecting everything Muslims do but hate everything whites do. You are clearly a very disturbed person.