What Is Happening To Our Country?

[sadoldgit]

7 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Calm down, it’s hardly crime of the century.

I didn’t say it was. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy. But then you know that.

[AlexLaw76]

15 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

I didn’t say it was. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy. But then you know that.

are we being told to shut up for the sake of diversity. Also, is my life in danger if I draw a cartoon of Jesus?

[benjii]

On 20/02/2026 at 04:28, revolution saint said:

I’m thinking of going on holiday abroad. Main criteria is a current monarchy, any recommendations? 

Brunei. Kuwait. Spain.

[sadoldgit]

42 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

are we being told to shut up for the sake of diversity. Also, is my life in danger if I draw a cartoon of Jesus?

Remind me again how many people are in jail for grooming and raping young girls?

When the flag shaggers were busy rioting and burning down hotels it was on the basis of false information circulating on the internet. There are countless instances of sex crimes being covered up by the Church but not a peep out of you and the flag shaggers. Tell me, why is that?

Could it be because they are not foreigners by any chance?

Edited yesterday at 11:05 by sadoldgit
Typo

[Lord Duckhunter]

12 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Remind me again how many people are in jail for grooming and raping young girls?

Not enough. 

[Holmes_and_Watson]

15 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Remind me again how many people are in jail for grooming and raping young girls?

When the flag shaggers were busy rioting and burning down hotels it was on the basis of false information circulating on the internet. There are countless instances of sex crimes being covered up by the Church but not a peep out of you and the flag shaggers. Tell me, why is that?

Could it be because they are not foreigners by any chance?

I hope none of them acted after you fabricated racially motivated damage to a car, and then blamed your wife for it.

[AlexLaw76]

27 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Remind me again how many people are in jail for grooming and raping young girls?

 

No where near enough, let alone the scale we were told to shut up and let the kids get raped for the sake of 'diversity'....

How is the Batley school teacher getting on...still alive I hope.

[sadoldgit]

5 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

No where near enough, let alone the scale we were told to shut up and let the kids get raped for the sake of 'diversity'....

How is the Batley school teacher getting on...still alive I hope.

“We” were told to shut up? Who is “we?” There were plenty of people who weren’t shutting up. Did you read the reports? Given that you only focus on one thing I’m guessing not. They found that there were multiple reasons why these matters weren’t dealt with properly at the time. Still, it suits your purpose just to focus on “diversity” and it is pretty obvious why that is.

It cuts both ways. Do you think that the Stephen Lawrence murder was handled well for example?

Child sexual abuse is clearly an abhorrence. It shouldn’t really matter what colour skin or what religion the perpetrators have. You only seem to get agitated by those with brown skins or Muslims. You won’t be surprised to hear that sexual abuse of children in the Christian church goes back way before immigration became an issue and there are still reports of cover ups. Perhaps you should spend as much time getting wound up about those too?

[Lord Duckhunter]

29 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Do you think that the Stephen Lawrence murder was handled well for example?

Not until the Daily Mail named the culprits, no. 

[Lord Duckhunter]

31 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

We” were told to shut up? Who is “we?” There were plenty of people who weren’t shutting up.

Unfortunately, you weren’t one of them. “Hardly crime of the century” was your analysis…

[east-stand-nic]

35 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

“We” were told to shut up? Who is “we?” There were plenty of people who weren’t shutting up. Did you read the reports? Given that you only focus on one thing I’m guessing not. They found that there were multiple reasons why these matters weren’t dealt with properly at the time. Still, it suits your purpose just to focus on “diversity” and it is pretty obvious why that is.

It cuts both ways. Do you think that the Stephen Lawrence murder was handled well for example?

Child sexual abuse is clearly an abhorrence. It shouldn’t really matter what colour skin or what religion the perpetrators have. You only seem to get agitated by those with brown skins or Muslims. You won’t be surprised to hear that sexual abuse of children in the Christian church goes back way before immigration became an issue and there are still reports of cover ups. Perhaps you should spend as much time getting wound up about those too?

And you have never condemned a Muslim attack of any kind and that is a fact. You are sick and vile in the way you view things. 

[trousers]

Saintsweb before the invention of the internet:

 

 

Edited yesterday at 13:07 by trousers

[sadoldgit]

42 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

And you have never condemned a Muslim attack of any kind and that is a fact. You are sick and vile in the way you view things. 

And you bring the level of debate on this forum to a constant low. I have condemned sex crimes committed by all, yes, including Muslims. You only seem bothered by sex crimes committed by immigrants. A simple bit of research will show you that most sex crimes are committed by the indigenous males, but hey, continue to focus on one group because it suits your agenda.

For someone with a supposed huge intellect you really are quite dense.

[sadoldgit]

51 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Unfortunately, you weren’t one of them. “Hardly crime of the century” was your analysis…

I assume you are referring to my comment about Hew Edwards as that is the only time I used that phrase.

It was based on the fact that the BBC had run the story as the main feature several nights in a row. It seemed like overkill given that it wasn’t actually the crime of the century and probably wasn’t the biggest news story every day of that week.

For a bit of perspective - put these three crimes in order of seriousness (hint, two of them are always tried in a Crown Court due to the level of seriousness).

Found in possession of indecent pictures of children.

Rape.

Murder.

Another clue. As far as we know, Edwards did not rape or murder anyone.

[sadoldgit]

54 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

And you have never condemned a Muslim attack of any kind and that is a fact. You are sick and vile in the way you view things. 

Every few weeks you make exactly the same claim and every few weeks you are just as wrong and deluded as you were before. Do you get off on making yourself look stupid on a daily basis?

[east-stand-nic]

42 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

And you bring the level of debate on this forum to a constant low. I have condemned sex crimes committed by all, yes, including Muslims. You only seem bothered by sex crimes committed by immigrants. A simple bit of research will show you that most sex crimes are committed by the indigenous males, but hey, continue to focus on one group because it suits your agenda.

For someone with a supposed huge intellect you really are quite dense.

Factually you have never once joined in condemning any Muslim attacks. Each and every time all you do is try to divert their wrong doings by saying whites do it more. You have the agenda, not us. You seem hell bent on protecting everything Muslims do but hate everything whites do. You are clearly a very disturbed person. 

[sadoldgit]

20 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

Factually you have never once joined in condemning any Muslim attacks. Each and every time all you do is try to divert their wrong doings by saying whites do it more. You have the agenda, not us. You seem hell bent on protecting everything Muslims do but hate everything whites do. You are clearly a very disturbed person. 

1. Factually there is plenty of factual evidence on this forum of me condemning any Muslim attacks.

2. Whites do it more? It is factually correct that “whites” commit more sexual assaults on women in this country. I make the point because people like you only focus on those who commit sexual assaults who have dark skins or are Muslim.

3. Provide evidence that I protect everything that Muslims do and hate everything whites do or STFU.

4. You, nutty nic, are the disturbed one. By some measure you are the most deluded, ignorant, blinkered, paedo supporting, far right apologist on here. Congratulations, that takes some doing.

I’ll say it again as you don’t seem to get it. I have zero tolerance for any extremists/terrorists who target innocent people no matter who they are. I worked in London at the height of the IRA bombing campaign and more recently was only a few hundreds yards away from the terror attack on London Bridge. All of the perpetrators no matter what their skin colour, religion or motive, can rot in hell as far as I am concerned.

Oh, and by the way, a vile person is someone who posts laughing emojis under posts about the deaths of innocent people and supports paedophiles. Little wonder you have ended up in Thailand.

Edited 7 hours ago by sadoldgit
Added text

[Lord Duckhunter]

20 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

put these three crimes in order of seriousness (hint, two of them are always tried in a Crown Court due to the level of seriousness).

Found in possession of indecent pictures of children.

Rape.

Murder.

Another clue. As far as we know, Edwards did not rape or murder anyone.

You’re sick in the head…

[Turkish]

21 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

I assume you are referring to my comment about Hew Edwards as that is the only time I used that phrase.

It was based on the fact that the BBC had run the story as the main feature several nights in a row. It seemed like overkill given that it wasn’t actually the crime of the century and probably wasn’t the biggest news story every day of that week.

For a bit of perspective - put these three crimes in order of seriousness (hint, two of them are always tried in a Crown Court due to the level of seriousness).

Found in possession of indecent pictures of children.

Rape.

Murder.

Another clue. As far as we know, Edwards did not rape or murder anyone.

Still trying to excuse how you shrugged your shoulders at this? You’re sick. 

[whelk]

I reckon SOG just shrugged at ‘home taping is killing music’

[AlexLaw76]

4 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Still trying to excuse how you shrugged your shoulders at this? You’re sick. 

His head is all over the place given he is likely fasting in solidarity with his barber 

[whelk]

He’d be losing his shit if it was anyone from the Christian church 

[sadoldgit]

4 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

You’re sick in the head…

Says the man that can’t condemn genocide and grades women according to how many pints he would need to drink in order to have sex with them.

If you think trying to put something into context is a problem you really shouldn’t spend your time here.

Ask yourself this, if it had been anyone else charged with being in possession of indecent images of children, would the BBC have run it as the main story for the best part of a week? They usually drop things further down the pecking order as the story progresses unless there is a new and major development. It smacks of the BBC trying to overcompensate because it was one of their own. Now you can disagree with that if you like, but spare me the faux outrage because I think that his crime did not warrant being the lead story for so long.

Edited 3 hours ago by sadoldgit
Added text

[whelk]

1 minute ago, sadoldgit said:

the man that can’t condemn genocide

Assume you apply that tag to anyone who isn’t a fervent anti-Semite like you?

[Holmes_and_Watson]

On 21/02/2026 at 12:55, trousers said:

Saintsweb before the invention of the internet:

 

 

No, it wasn't! 🙂

[Holmes_and_Watson]

@sadoldgit: Your comments of "it's not the crime of the century" and "relatively trivial" regarding child abuse, were the worst things I've read here. Kindly stop trying to justify your comments. It does you no favours whatsoever, and simply reinforces the views people have of you.

[badgerx16]

44 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

No, it wasn't! 🙂

I see you got full value for your £8.

[hypochondriac]

1 hour ago, sadoldgit said:

Says the man that can’t condemn genocide and grades women according to how many pints he would need to drink in order to have sex with them.

If you think trying to put something into context is a problem you really shouldn’t spend your time here.

Ask yourself this, if it had been anyone else charged with being in possession of indecent images of children, would the BBC have run it as the main story for the best part of a week? They usually drop things further down the pecking order as the story progresses unless there is a new and major development. It smacks of the BBC trying to overcompensate because it was one of their own. Now you can disagree with that if you like, but spare me the faux outrage because I think that his crime did not warrant being the lead story for so long.

Obviously your whole premise is idiotic but at the risk of prolonging this ridiculous conversation, it's the fact it wasn't someone else and was in fact one of the leading faces of the BBC that made it such a big story for the BBC. It's not just the awful crime clearly, it's the context behind it.

[hypochondriac]

I wonder if soggy would have described it as hardly the crime of the centriy if it had been Boris Johnson or Tommy Robinson caught with child porn?

[Holmes_and_Watson]

15 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

I see you got full value for your £8.

No, I didn't! 🙂

[Lord Duckhunter]

Ridiculous argument from our resident weirdo, he seems to be arguing that it’s just illegal porn & not a “proper” crime like rape. This from the bloke who wanted Ched Evan’s banged up for spit roasting a slapper. Get your priorities right man, there isn’t a hierarchy of sex crimes. You can contrast rape with burglaries or fraud, but to do so with these horrendous offences is sick. These kids subjected to the vile photos are just as much a victim as anyone who was ever raped. 

[AlexLaw76]

Seeing Soggy once again embarrassing himself, I reckon we are not far away from another self imposed exile 

[Lord Duckhunter]

5 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

and more recently was only a few hundreds yards away from the terror attack on London Bridge.

[Turkish]

33 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Seeing Soggy once again embarrassing himself, I reckon we are not far away from another self imposed exile 

Then come out swinging a week later like nothings happened. Same old story. What’s weird is he could have quite easily backed down, he didn’t even need to mention it again, but oh no can’t be wrong can he.

[hypochondriac]

2 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Ridiculous argument from our resident weirdo, he seems to be arguing that it’s just illegal porn & not a “proper” crime like rape. This from the bloke who wanted Ched Evan’s banged up for spit roasting a slapper. Get your priorities right man, there isn’t a hierarchy of sex crimes. You can contrast rape with burglaries or fraud, but to do so with these horrendous offences is sick. These kids subjected to the vile photos are just as much a victim as anyone who was ever raped. 

Worth pointing out that any downloading of child abuse creates a market for it and is very much supporting child rape and abuse. So yes it is as bad as those crimes (as if that needed to be said.)