Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BranfootsLoveChild said:

I think the FA will wait until we've climbed the table then fuck us over big time. 

Did you hear Tonda on the last question of the Birmingham pre-game press conference? 

He was trying to say that the EFL and FA have fucked the Championship clubs over with an evening kick off on transfer deadline day. You could see he wanted to call them cunts; had about three goes at trying to phrase it so we understood he wasn't impressed, but might avoid a ban from the worthless thin skinned bureaucrats.

Edited by Patches O Houlihan
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, BranfootsLoveChild said:

I think the FA will wait until we've climbed the table then fuck us over big time. 

Yep, I get the impression that’s the script. 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I really do think, if we were absolutely flying, annihilating the opposition, they would go harder on us. That would have them on a crusade to tear us down even further. In truth the damage (self) inflicted right now cannot be properly measured as yet. But it could well turn out to be catastrophic. Chucked out of a very winnable play off final, then subsequently missing out on the auto's due to the four point deduction, that could have ramifications for years! 

They want us to suffer. They want us as the example they still have control. But another punishment dump could be hard to justify considering we are still serving the last two. 

This inconsistency of form we are suffering from, might well be thing thing that quietly lets this unfold without too much fanfare. 

I mean, there's no club in the country who stands by a manager with a six month ban who can't keep a clean sheet and can't win away from home. They understand the consequences of the next over reaction. Him getting jettisoned by us the very next day does not fit the criteria. 

Six game touch line ban and a large personal fine incoming. Anything else and the baby is going out the window rapidly following the bath tub. 

This shit ends this week. We've all had enough.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 01/09/2026 at 09:52, BranfootsLoveChild said:

I think the FA will wait until we've climbed the table then fuck us over big time. 

The FA won't be deciding anything. The sanctions will be decided by a panel of three consisting of a KC and two "industry experts".

Posted

I'm pretty much resigned to the opinion that the FA will throw not just the book but the whole library at Tonda, just as the EFL did at the club with expulsion from the playoffs. 

A soft target to be made an example of and they can be seen to be tough on rule breakers while City and Chelsea either get away with it or get a financial slap on the wrist. 

If the punishment is punitive then we as fans must not take it lying down, regardless of what the club does in the immediate aftermath. 

 

Posted

I wonder if the lack of spending in the summer relieves some funds for a new manager?  Promoting Garner or Lallana, or both, seems the likely option.

Posted
24 minutes ago, do i not like fizzy pop said:

If the punishment is punitive then we as fans must not take it lying down, regardless of what the club does in the immediate aftermath. 

I have severe doubts in our fanbase's ability to react in a proactive and fiery manner to an injustice like this.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Disco Stu said:

The FA won't be deciding anything. The sanctions will be decided by a panel of three consisting of a KC and two "industry experts".

They'll be provided by the same company that the EFL disciplinary panel was - Sport Resolutions - so they will concur with them.

0a0e87d0-5538-11f1-ab88-f930a57d19ce.pdf

It's a shame Sport Resolutions have a monopoly in the business because with both the EFL and FA using them,  it means we get the same severity of punishment twice. If there were a rival company, the second panel might take a different view. But the panel members will all want to keep their lucrative jobs with Sport Resolutions so they won't risk disagreeing. It's all about money in the end.

Edited by Nordic Saint
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, CSA96 said:

 

Good, get it done.

Then we can finally draw a line under it and get on with the season without all the uncertainty hanging over our heads. 

Albeit, we chose this path, knowing full well that we were going to face further sanctions and disruption, rather than cleaning house and moving on in the summer. 

We've got no excuses for not having rock solid contingency plans in place, regardless of the outcome. 

  • Like 2
Posted
50 minutes ago, Nordic Saint said:

They'll be provided by the same company that the EFL disciplinary panel was - Sport Resolutions - so they will concur with them.

0a0e87d0-5538-11f1-ab88-f930a57d19ce.pdf

It's a shame Sport Resolutions have a monopoly in the business because with both the EFL and FA using them,  it means we get the same severity of punishment twice. If there were a rival company, the second panel might take a different view. But the panel members will all want to keep their lucrative jobs with Sport Resolutions so they won't risk disagreeing. It's all about money in the end.

Will Sport Resolutions be selecting panel members without any connections (no matter how fleeting) to the case this time around...?

Posted
13 minutes ago, trousers said:

Will Sport Resolutions be selecting panel members without any connections (no matter how fleeting) to the case this time around...?

More importantly, will we be using legal council (at all?) that will actually bother to look?

Posted

We've got no excuses for not having rock solid contingency plans in place, regardless of the outcome.

_________________________________________________

What, like a replacement lined up? 

Jesus, even on easy mode that plan has a massive failure rate...................its why we are sticking by the dude.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Nordic Saint said:

They'll be provided by the same company…

It's a shame Sport Resolutions have a monopoly in the business because with both the EFL and FA using them,  it means we get the same severity of punishment twice. If there were a rival company, the second panel might take a different view.m But the panel members will all want to keep their lucrative jobs with Sport Resolutions so they won't risk disagreeing. It's all about money in the end.

So, no conflict of interest whatsoever.
 

And no it’s not about money, it’s all about the integrity of the game…

What bollocks. 

  • Like 1
Posted

The fact that Parsons has done an interview with the BBC worries me. I think the club are expecting bad news.

Parsons speaking at all is bad news tbf. Bloke is a buffoon. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said:

The fact that Parsons has done an interview with the BBC worries me. I think the club are expecting bad news.

Parsons speaking at all is bad news tbf. Bloke is a buffoon. 

Where is this interview?

Posted

The club or/and Tonda will have an idea of what the punishment might be, it will be a range between A and B. They will not be left completely in the dark. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...