St Chalet Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cqx1wqr3yjno This on top of their massive 6 point deduction. In the article it suggested we were considering a legal claim along with Forrest.
coalman Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 10 minutes ago, St Chalet said: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cqx1wqr3yjno This on top of their massive 6 point deduction. In the article it suggested we were considering a legal claim along with Forrest. Meanwhile in Middlesborough as the news was being received. 4
Saint86 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago That's a bugger for us. Goes a long way to wiping out the first year reduction in parachute payments.
Football Special Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Opens a can of worms, we'll end up with clubs taking out lawsuits against each other , lawyers will be delighted but the game is so far removed from the every day fan with all this nonsense Expect the appeal will take a while to be heard 3
obelisk Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago It's getting to the stage where there'll be no point playing actual games of football. Get in a decent defence of highly paid lawyers and promotion will be available without even having to kick a ball soon. I have to ask whether standing behind a tree with a camera watching events going on in public view is a better or worse offence than this though. 1
pingpong Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Forget getting a new striker, who is going to be in the legal team next year? Can we get that lord panic guy involved? 1
JohnnyShearer2.0 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Think Everton are appealing. Also is this worse cheating than Spying ? Funny if they say to Burnley, they can have Dibling instead. Edited 6 hours ago by JohnnyShearer2.0
badgerx16 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Think Everton are appealing. Not my type. Edited 6 hours ago by badgerx16 1 7
Gloucester Saint Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Absolute mess. Pace may well use that money to pay down some of the debts accrued from their leveraged takeover.
West Dean FC Legend Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Interesting response from Everton, ummm not saying they didn't do it, just saying it wasn't fair. Errrrr....the rules were there, it is your job to know them, you can't make excuses afterwards. So you are guilty of doing what you were charged with: The club said in a statement they were "clear in the belief the ruling is fundamentally flawed in both law and fact". "This ruling sets a dangerous and unworkable precedent for English football, given it is constructed on a principle that a club can be in breach of financial rules at any point in a financial year," the statement said.
Soton7 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago It sounds like the Premier League, EFL, FA and FIFA are a bunch of corrupt wankers who couldn’t run a bath. Absolutely useless. 1
DellBlockH Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago It makes you wonder how any football club can plan for the future. Everton were punished at the time and, presumably, thought that was it. Any claim by Burnley (or any other club) should have been dealt with then. The same goes for our recent transgression. Deal with it summarily and move on. Having several goes at the same offence helps no-one. Moving on to any claim against us that Middlesbrough might contemplate, I think it would be difficult for them to show that our spying denied them Premier League football. They rather managed that on their own. 2
DellBlockH Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 5 minutes ago, West Dean FC Legend said: Interesting response from Everton, ummm not saying they didn't do it, just saying it wasn't fair. Errrrr....the rules were there, it is your job to know them, you can't make excuses afterwards. So you are guilty of doing what you were charged with: The club said in a statement they were "clear in the belief the ruling is fundamentally flawed in both law and fact". "This ruling sets a dangerous and unworkable precedent for English football, given it is constructed on a principle that a club can be in breach of financial rules at any point in a financial year," the statement said. They are not saying that they didn’t commit the offence or that they shouldn't be punished (they were). They are saying that they cannot be held financially liable for Burnley's relegation.
Turkish Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Soton7 said: It sounds like the Premier League, EFL, FA and FIFA are a bunch of corrupt wankers who couldn’t run a bath. Absolutely useless. didnt you know already?
saintant Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago It's getting to the stage where your team of lawyers is more important than your team of players. 2
chownie20 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago cant remember what happened that season but dont we equally have an argument too?
Football Special Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 30 minutes ago, saintant said: It's getting to the stage where your team of lawyers is more important than your team of players. Match of the Day coming live from the High Court 2
SWLondon Saint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Jesus, what a mess. Can't see this ending well for anyone except the lawyers. I remember someone was saying in the spygate thread that a lot of football, despite the big money, is really badly / incompetently run. This kind of thing just proves that.... 1
Harry_SFC Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) This is getting ridiculous now Edited 5 hours ago by Harry_SFC
West Dean FC Legend Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 51 minutes ago, DellBlockH said: They are not saying that they didn’t commit the offence or that they shouldn't be punished (they were). They are saying that they cannot be held financially liable for Burnley's relegation. Thanks for that - you can tell I was an electrician for a while 😂 I would say that if they broke those rules, in Premiership football these clearly has an effect on your squad/managment and therefore it must affect results - therefore Burnley can easily claim what they did. Whether it is a much as that who knows but you can definitely argue that without such an advantage Everton may not have stayed up and Burnley might have - you can't prove it but you can't disprove it either. Anyway tactics - oh never mind them - who cares?! 🙃
bpsaint Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Why were we considering legal action? For the following season to Burnley going down I’m guessing, 2022/23? Trying to establish why Forest were also considering legal action against Everton?
trousers Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Now that's how you respond to a football authority's charges... 3
die Mannyschaft Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Does that then mean teams who finished 2nd or 3rd in Premier League when City won leaque could then sue City if they get done for 115 breaches. The same could be done for a relegated team for teams that missed out on a europe place, a final or semi final in leawue Cup or FA cup. This is a dream ruling for lawyers 2
Lallana's Left Peg Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I think Everton are right - this sets a dangerous and ridiculous precedent that most importantly doesn't have boundaries or can be proven. The ruling says Everton breaking the rules 'probably' impacted Burnley's ability to stay in the division. Where do you draw the line? Sue for red cards and simulation? It's all conjecture. What we actually need are strong and respected football authorities who have clear rules, clear punishments for breaking those rules, and apply those rules equally and fairly independent of the size of the club. Then none of this nonsense would happen. 3
Charlie Wayman Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, Soton7 said: It sounds like the Premier League, EFL, FA and FIFA are a bunch of corrupt wankers who couldn’t run a bath. Absolutely useless. You sound surprised.
rallyboy Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago So Everton have clearly brought the game into disrepute - as have West Ham with their owner, so I guess they're both heading for League One at least. Add in Man City getting liquidated for their charges, Chelsea and Liverpool getting hit for their misdemeanours and anyone who has ever played Man City or Leicester seeking compensation and it's going to be a complex season. Especially if Hull don't raise the immediate sales income to save them from having to pay ALL of us compensation... We could be minted by August.
Osvaldorama Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Absolute farce. Stupid decision as much as I hate Everton and want to laugh at them. We should sue Leicester now for getting promoted whilst in breach of financial regulations. They cost us an autos place 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 12 minutes ago Posted 12 minutes ago 1 hour ago, rallyboy said: So Everton have clearly brought the game into disrepute - as have West Ham with their owner, so I guess they're both heading for League One at least. Add in Man City getting liquidated for their charges, Chelsea and Liverpool getting hit for their misdemeanours and anyone who has ever played Man City or Leicester seeking compensation and it's going to be a complex season. Especially if Hull don't raise the immediate sales income to save them from having to pay ALL of us compensation... We could be minted by August. I look forward to Corinthian FC being crowned PL champions, following the retroactive punishments imposed across the history of football.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now