Colinjb

Is their infrastructure now enough to sustain them?

So, people were murdered because some little oik wasn't getting any? Just, what!?

Never go back. Although the heart strings are saying it would be fun.

Graham Poll on BT Sport insisted that any contact with the keeper in the air is a foul. So it should have been dissallowed based on the rules of the game. Charlie didn't do anything wrong though, just stood there. I simply cannot understand how it was a foul, unless football has suddenly become a non-contact sport.

Glad we are continuing to try and go forward (At least after Tadic and Redmond came on.) Makes the inevitable defeats slightly less tedious.

It's not going to happen.

Absolutely not enough. Stick a fork in us, we're done.

Slightly confused....

Twenty minutes to make a positive difference.... No, I'm not holding my breath.

The only thing that I will miss is the mediaexposure. The ease in finding match coverage, highlights and reports on how we aredoing.

We bought our own?

Not sure how many people will have seen, but there has been someoutcry over the BBC's decision to broadcast Ian McDiarmid's reading the infamous'Rivers of Blood' speech originally given by Enoch Powell in the 60's. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43745447 I have been having a quite interesting debate with another forum member over the questions itraises over free speech. Whether controversial items like this should becensored. On what grounds should they be censored, etc My perspective is that censoring ideas like this is not right, only risks driving repellent ideas underground and will prove to be detrimental to society as it lacks that chance to learn from such material. The alternative view was that without having the right level of educational standing or intellectual capability these ideas will only prove dangerous and will be misused. While I have strength in my conviction, I can understand the opposing view. It's not an easy topic.... Which is why it should be discussed. Has the BBC gone too far? Should these ideas be kept out of the mainstream ordo they need to be kept in the open to be debunked?

Extremely interesting. From memory he was regarded as something of a joke figure here (due to manager's comments?) A great shame he never fulfilled his potential. Physical resilience and health can so often be a lottery.

Actually enjoyed the game today. But of course: Plucky defeat.

Stephens you idiot.

The last time we showed desire like this was the league cup final. Sadly, same scoreline.

Right. We go again.

Actually trying to play the ball in the opponents half. Not bad over the last ten minutes.

On the topic of right-backs, was going to say 'What's Jason McCarthy up to now?' Only to see he's been moved on to Barnsley.

Andreas Jakobson? Callum Davenport?

Talk is cheap.

So, the Championship next season.....

Lallana? Nope, this isn't worth taking seriously.

He is an idealist, and that makes him dangerous, naïve and utterly unsuitable for a role like leader of the opposition, let alone Prime Minister. He has also been proven to be every bit as hypocritical as any other politician yet maintains the same air and tries to project the same image. On that basis he is dangerous, and so regardless of the respect I may have for some of his ideals, I hate the prospect of him becoming prime minister. It would be disastrous.

I don't think taking on someone with a spine that cannot even sustain a round of golf, or in any way train without seizing up would be a good idea. Let's stick with the guy who has scored goals in Ligue 1 and played in the Champions League.