revolution saint

Infract me up but christ you really are a boring, one trick pony c u n t.

And personally I was surprised that people took offence to it in the first place and it was closed. Clearly it was a popular and interesting thread and it was always possible to ignore. If anyone is being over the top then it's you - puppy being stabbed? Bit of a drama queen post really.

It would be a nice idea.......but I doubt it'll happen. Shame. Anyone got any links to forums with some football rumours? Obviously I already check football rumours so don't suggest that but any others will be welcome. On a side note can we get rid of the "what films are you watching", "what are you listening to", "what are you reading" threads? Personally I like them but obviously there are some people with short attention spans and they're the people we should be thinking of.

Isn't there also a Fit and Proper persons test as well? You'd hope it should be unlikely he'd pass that.

I think you're probably right, although there is speculation that Murdoch might jettison all of his papers. Newspapers in their current form are dying and I'm not sure how successful the internet subscription NI introduced has been. I don't think it's likely that he will sell off the rest of his papers but it's nice to speculate that he might.

To be honest it's all a matter of opinion, isn't it? I didn't find the rumours thread annoying in the slightest. If you didn't like it then you could ignore it, or you could start individual rumour threads as well - I don't see any reason why they couldn't co-exist and in many cases they did. Still it's a small thing to get worked up about, it's just a shame it's gone. Oh and the match day thread suggestion was a joke - fairly sure most people would have got that but I can always edit it if you found it annoying.

I liked the rumours thread, trawling through it was no more ardous than looking at individual threads. I imagine the matchday threads will now be split up into individual minute threads?

Always rated Roberts and whilst he isn't exactly quick he's still a decent player, would be a handy acquisition. Might just be agent talk though - I seem to remember us being linked with him last season so it could be a lazy rehash of that.

I can't be bothered to trawl through the entire thread but what has the perennial Left vs Right argument got to do with NOTW closing? I thought it was because NOTW did some illegal and morally corrupt things, became a toxic brand and were closed? I can't see how Left or Right ideology has any bearing on this.

soon find out.....and to be fair it couldn't be worse.

Genuine question - what in terms of teaching is the difference between a faith school and a secular one?

Registering the sunday sun earlier in the week actually shows Murdoch was reacting to events. Phil was implying they orchestrated this whole thing a long time before and I doubt that's the case.

Well Ed does give a fairly damning interview about brooks on Newsnight tonight. Personally though I think if this becomes political then it would be easier to give Murdoch control of Bskyb. All the time the public are focussed on Murdoch then it becomes harder. Just my opinion and I guess we probably want the same thing...

Sorry Phil but I think that's a conspiracy theory too far. This is a huge story, massive, and doesn't really need embellishment. NI have been reacting to events (events dear boy - never thought I'd quote MacMillan).

I'm not sure Bexy, the problem is that if we pursue this line of argument then it becomes political, subjective and open to interpretation. We've already seen an attempt to label the BBC as just as bad, albeit a poorly thought out attempt. Personally I'd like to focus on just how f*cked up what NOTW did was, and how Murdoch can make reparation for that. It would be a shame if this became a tory v labour argument.

Reporting and Information Manager - that's such a bland title it could mean anything and frequently does.

I agree, and maybe winding up the NOTW isn't such a clever move either. Clearly it was dead duck but by existing it could absorb the outrage of the masses - by getting rid of it there isn't a brand to apologise for it's mistakes. Except there needs to be someone to blame, and not just Wade, so where does that anger get deflected to? As it stands it's the rest of Murdoch's tabloid press (ie The Sun). People are a lot more media savvy these days and personally I don't think they'll take kindly to what is in effect a complete evasion of culpability by News International. The tabloid Murdoch press has been used to whipping it's readers up in a frenzy so it's quite ironic that it's that same baying mob that is causing it's downfall.

No problem, and Alistair Campbell was saying the same on Newsnight last night but so far the only allegations of illegality have been against NOTW. That may change but for now it's just them, and it's a horrible enough crime that it justifies just concentrating on them.

Sorry, but this is about the NOTW. If other allegations arise then that's different. Don't presume to know what I meant.

I can't really see anyone caring about a News International internal investigation. Career wise Brookes is toast, although financially Uncle Rupert will see she's OK.

Exactly. It's nothing to do with party politics, or indeed the wider press. It's about a disgusting and what seems endemic culture within NOTW.

I've not seen that anywhere, have you got a link? Meanwhile this shows how a bit of money hushes things up. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/08/murdoch-papers-phone-hacking

I'd give most of it to friends, family and charity - that much money is incomprehensible. I'd also buy a few places - certainly in New England and here. I'd also like to design and build my own place, a bit like grand designs. Mostly though I would go back to University and study something totally useless but interesting.

Not really, you just spoil most threads and I like making you look a bit silly. Nothing snobbish about that - I think most people enjoy that.

To be fair, it's not just today.