-
Posts
18,796 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Lord Duckhunter
-
Perhaps Puel has seen him in training, seen the data from the fitness people & decided not to "give him a go". If he's no intention of playing next season, I'd rather give someone who is "a go". Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Since his injury he hasn't been anywhere near the standard of pre injury JRod. How do you know Caceres hasn't suffered the same drop off. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Carraghar criticised him on Sky on Sunday , saying his final ball was sometimes poor. So it's probably a question of people hearing that and jumping on the bandwagon. It happens on here all the time, once a few idiots start it runs and runs . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Two things lacking from the current squad
Lord Duckhunter replied to doddisalegend's topic in The Saints
There is a problem with leaders. The keeper is an experienced player yet he hardly says a word. Yoshida is very quiet, even Stephens seems louder than him, maybe because of his lack of English . For all his good work OR doesn't seem to be the type either. If your keeper, centre halves & CM's are quiet you're really struggling to get leadership. There is a lack of leaders in the game, so we were lucky with VvD & Jose (Toby wasn't really one or Big Vic or Lovren). It wouldn't surprise me if we're having the same conversation next season, even with 3 or 4 new players. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
What like JRod? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Are you really that clueless? Here's a theory. The club think Stephens & Yoshida are first choice. They feel that Stephens is ready to play, but that Alfie Jones isn't, and also don't think Gardos is good enough. They therefore make a temporary signing of Caceres as cover in case Stephens or Yoshida get injured or suspended. Stephens & Yoshida haven't got injured or suspended, therefore Caceres hasn't been needed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Souness hit the nail on the head. We're lovely to watch, play some good stuff. But are a bit too easy to play against. We'd all like both, but is that realistic? I guess some would rather be like stoke or WBA & be more difficult to play against. Personally, if we're going to finish mid table, I'd rather do it like we are, than them . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Yeah good idea. Let's give him a game before he ****s off in the summer & drop a nipper who is gaining valuable experience & doing a decent job. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Having watched the reply I've come to the conclusion you are clueless. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Or perhaps the big sides are better this season Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
You're ****ing deluded. There's not one neutral who will say we were "really poor", not one. Look in the papers tomorrow, listen to the pundits , they'll not be one that states that Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I can't believe we're not beating the team on top of the league & who just put 4 past a really good Spurs side away from home. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
When the going gets tough Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Had the two men done their job at the corner the cross wouldn't have come in & it wouldn't have gone over Maya's head. Too easy to blame Yoshida & Stephens. I bet no pundits or writers say they were poor, yet you ****ing idiots on here will Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
****ing idiots blaming Stephens & Yoshida, they're not to blame. Spurs let in 4 on Sat against them , were their morons blaming their centre halves? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Bertrands fault , but I'm sure the centre halves will get the blame Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Stephens has done ok today Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
It was JWP outjumped by Alanso not anyone from the back. Started when Cedric went with his wrong foot to clear and sliced the ball for a corner. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Not a free kick because the ref blew before the ball was in play. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Anyway it's irrelevant now, Farron has finally said gay sex is not a sin. Hopefully now he's cleared that up he'll stop lying that he voted for equal marriage Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
What's that got to do with anything. Unless the 83 go on national TV and claim their voting record proves they aren't homophobic, whilst refusing to say homosexual acts aren't sinful , it's completely and utterly irrelevant. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Not only that, but because of him The EU will change. Of course lefties are so blinkered they can't acknowledge his influence. Without Nigel we'd have still been the EU, with out this EU guy with his "credibility " the EU would be exactly the same as it is now. He's influenced nothing, just another EU clone . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
As a Christian he answered the question that little Timmy seemed incapable of doing. Farron quite deliberately kept conflating the question of whether homosexual acts are a sin with whether being a homosexual is a sin. Give cut straight to it and said homosexual acts are not sinful. Farron also lied about his voting record in HoC over equal marriage, he did not vote for it on final reading but abstained . He also voted against the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations, which outlawed discrimination in goods and services.Peston being a pinko let him off the hook, imagine the outcry if Nigel had answered similarly. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
In which way has he more credibility than any other elected politician? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
More likely to be VvD wanting to stay on and see how it went. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
