-
Posts
9739 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Dark Munster
-
Especially if they go down with 40+ points. Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't they the last team to do so?
-
And the current rule is fine if it were easy to implement in close calls. As we've seen, it isn't. We're suggesting a minor change in the rule. Ice hockey has an "offside" rule which is of course different from football's, but has similarities. Roughly speaking a player in hockey is offside if he enters the attacking zone before the puck. The way they define this is he's offside if both his skates enter the zone before the puck. Note they determine this only with his skates, not any other part of the body. And you can't score goals in hockey by kicking the puck into the net! So using feet only for offside in football isn't unreasonable. The difference between being offside/onside with the current rule and such a new one would only be inches.
-
If we can get 4 (or 6) from the next two then the Liverpool match would be the proverbial free hit.
-
Two words. Sheffield United.
-
Long's offside today that negated the penalty is a perfect example why using feet only makes it clearer. It looked like the defender's arm was in line with his foot. Certainly not a clear offside, and very hard to judge one way or the other. If feet only had been used he was clearly offside and no-one could complain. Dropping perpendicular lines down trailing body parts to determine who's in front in razor thin margins, as they did today, is just bollocks. As they say, Keep It Simple Stupid.
-
davieG:
-
Actually a bit stupid, firing up our players even more. We were all over them like a bulldog going after a pork chop, especially in the first half. Brilliant performance.
-
... if your bike is still there.
-
Why would it matter if he scores with his head, bum, knee or chest? As long as his feet are onside when the pass is made. The idea is to make the rule as simple as possible to judge, and minimize errors. It's not a drastic change, and keeps the spirit of the rule alive.
-
Doesn't it depends who we face? Maybe they are waiting to see if we're playing Spurs to move it for TV. Or is it too late now?
-
So no-one ****ing asked why the club takes such a ****ing low away ticket allocations?
-
Michael Obafemi - Official: Signs for Swansea
Dark Munster replied to SuperSAINT's topic in The Saints
In fairness, if Redmond was able emulate Henry I don't see why Obafemi can't emulate Bale. -
Does a 2 card yellow sending off suspension apply to the next league match? I know a straight red does, but not sure if a 2 yellow does. Either way, a second yellow would be most welcome.
-
If we do bring someone in I hope the scouts who recommended the likes of Enouseless, Hoedt, Vest, etc. are not involved (and no longer work for the club, for that matter).
-
That was us until a couple of seasons ago. We had a consistently awful injury record, in stark contrast to Leicester who never seemed to have more than one or two injuries (especially during their miracle season). I think Pearson had a lot to do with that, and they have continued it to this day. Something seems to have changed at SMS, and credit to our current (new?) physios/sport science guys for turning it around. It's massive keeping the majority of players fit. Bournemouth and Newcastle being prime examples of what happens if you don't.
-
Yes, definitely. Not sure when though.
-
Exactly this. And the VAR is a professional referee, not some random bloke with a monitor. Plus having the on field ref going over to a monitor will slow the game down. As others have said, change the offside rule so only feet positions count, and give the VAR 30 seconds max to make a decision. If he's not 100% certain, the goal stands. Occasionally a goal will be scored by a player 1 cm offside. Tough luck, take it on the chin, and move on. If it happens to us I wouldn't get apoplectic about it (unlike that Wembley call, and the Watford basketball player's "goal").
-
Whitey Grandad's TV:
-
True. And we may have won!
-
Don't know if he's any good, but that's the type of player we need. Central striker who can score.
-
Maybe we could convince Monaco to buy him?
-
Saints 2 Huddersfield 0 - Match & Reactions Thread
Dark Munster replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
His disallowed goal was well-taken and only mm offside, and he had a very nice assist for the first goal. I thought he did ok. Incidentally Romeu was ok too, not sure he's getting slagged off by some here. He's a good player, but not really suited to park the bus teams. Better suited to ones that come at us (like Leicester will next week). I thought Vest, Boufal and Adam's had disappointing games, although the latter had a nice assist on the second goal. Danso is also getting slagged off, but he's not a RB. I don't think he was that bad, and he's got a nice throw in. Everyone else was ok, even if no one was outstanding. Job done. -
Saints 2 Huddersfield 0 - Match & Reactions Thread
Dark Munster replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
So were some of the shirt pulls. -
Saints 2 Huddersfield 0 - Match & Reactions Thread
Dark Munster replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
No yellows for all those Huddersfield shirt pulls, but Long gets one for clipping a player's foot.
