it was bloody awful apart from a decent run in his first season.
Jeff Stelling's rant about him getting the hell out of Hartlepool today made me remember similar thoughts just before those terrible accusations were made against him.
Same mistake with the subs as the Bournemouth game. Brings on Boufal for JWP, gives up the midfield in doing so and get over run. Got away with it against the Cherry Pips but you don't against a decent side like City.
Funny how people look at things differently. When I first saw their TV ad that's currently running my first reaction was that they must be pretty proud to sponsor Saints if they are putting representation of the club in their marketing strategy.
the fact that **** Adrian Chiles supports them tells you everything you need to know about "the Albion"
Great result and even the most pessimistic must admit we are safe
Actually he isn't mis-reading anything. They have made a real pigs breakfast of the away matches where some list Saints score first (West Ham 3-0) and others list it second (Sunderland 0-4)
Well I thought generally it was light hearted banter regarding trying to listen to Puel for half an hour but some people seem to have got very upset so ******** basically !!
Problem with Tadic is that he plays when he wants to, no consistency whatsoever. Having said that there is always the chance of that killer ball that will create a chance.
I just wonder if this has cropped up because he knows that Puel is going to prefer Boufal next season having paid all that money for him and that there isnt much chance of playing both in the same team given they are what used to be called "luxury" players ?
a hired hand that has played for Barcelona and Juventus ! I can't quite believe you think Caceres should only be needed if Stephens or Yoshida get injured. Seriously ?
I thought we did ok, especially second half. It came down to two pens, one was given and one wasn't. All those slagging off Long for being offside, a fair few times he was level therefore onside.