Jump to content

No wage paid today


Matthew Le God

Recommended Posts

I agree. Pinnacle may be genuine but to be honest, there has to be a proper deadline in place now, or they should leave the table.

 

Why are people so keen for them to walk away?

 

If they walk, SFC folds.

 

We may not like the amount of time it's taking, but we have nothing to gain from them walking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Pinnacle may be genuine but to be honest, there has to be a proper deadline in place now, or they should leave the table.

 

Trouble is any reputable bid would require the same assurances from the FL, as Pinnacle are seeking. Then again, there is always Jackson!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, like last month, doesn't this put the Football Club subsidiary on the brink of Administration too? (it is afterall the Football Club company's name on the payslips, not SLH.)

 

Perhaps this is part of the sub-plot I've been alluding to about getting SFC Ltd into admin so we can come up with the CVA(s) that the FL need sight of?

 

Not paying wages is probably the easiest/quickest route to going into admin?

 

All in my opinion of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are people so keen for them to walk away?

 

If they walk, SFC folds.

 

We may not like the amount of time it's taking, but we have nothing to gain from them walking.

I suggest there isnt much time before they walk . If they dont stump up and the squad is decimated by firesales the asset they are buying is devalued and so they wont want to buy.It is a vicious circle.

Edited by OldNick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest there isnt much time before they walk i would suggest. If they dont stump up and the squad is decimated by firesales the asset they are buying is devalued and so they wont want to buy.It is a vicious circle.

 

I think we're past the stage of firesales to be honest. Player sales take time, other clubs know that they could hold out for a couple of days and get the players for free.

 

If SFC can't pay wages, they are insolvent, and the club will be liquidated. From what I've heard, SFC can't operate in administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If SFC can't pay wages, they are insolvent, and the club will be liquidated. From what I've heard, SFC can't operate in administration.
that is my impression, but by Fry saying he would sell players made it seeem that liquidation could be held back for a small amount of time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what does our failure to pay our staff mean in a business/legal sense? Will Fry have to declare the company insolvent or will the club be paced into administration in its own right (or both) How much time does the club have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's in the FL's interest to let matters drift a few days. If SFC can't pay the wages it shows that the club is insolvent. Pinacle are stuck on this one. If they put up £500,000 at a small risk the FL will say there you are proof that the club itself is insolvent. If they don't the FL will say there you are proof that the club itself is insolvent. The FL will be in no hurry and Lineham recognises this talking about they may not get back to him today. The stupidity of the pretence is now actually delaying the takeover. You will still get the same points deductions but you face a delayed takeover because the delay strengthens the leagues case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pinnacle will sort this. I like the way they're not sucking the FL over the issues they have.

 

What a poetic turn of phrase you have Ponty. :)

 

Presumably this really does put the club in jeopardy unless Fry has another exclusive lined up with £500K.

 

Last month he was fairly sure that the wages could be paid albeit late (Dyer's transfer fee etc). If there is nothing lined up this month surely he will have to fold the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's in the FL's interest to let matters drift a few days. If SFC can't pay the wages it shows that the club is insolvent. Pinacle are stuck on this one. If they put up £500,000 at a small risk the FL will say there you are proof that the club itself is insolvent. If they don't the FL will say there you are proof that the club itself is insolvent. The FL will be in no hurry and Lineham recognises this talking about they may not get back to him today. The stupidity of the pretence is now actually delaying the takeover. You will still get the same points deductions but you face a delayed takeover because the delay strengthens the leagues case.

 

Spot on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a poetic turn of phrase you have Ponty. :)

 

Presumably this really does put the club in jeopardy unless Fry has another exclusive lined up with £500K.

 

Last month he was fairly sure that the wages could be paid albeit late (Dyer's transfer fee etc). If there is nothing lined up this month surely he will have to fold the club.

but Im sure you will find it is not 500k but nearer £1m. Wages HMRC and player bonuses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's in the FL's interest to let matters drift a few days. If SFC can't pay the wages it shows that the club is insolvent. Pinacle are stuck on this one. If they put up £500,000 at a small risk the FL will say there you are proof that the club itself is insolvent. If they don't the FL will say there you are proof that the club itself is insolvent. The FL will be in no hurry and Lineham recognises this talking about they may not get back to him today. The stupidity of the pretence is now actually delaying the takeover. You will still get the same points deductions but you face a delayed takeover because the delay strengthens the leagues case.

 

Surely though if this were to happen Pinnacle could turn round and say the football club was never in administration, nor would it have been if you had let us do the deal. We will now sue you for forcing the club into administration

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardly deserves the "Breaking News" splash....maybe they could design an "Expected News, but we'll try to make it more sensational" splash?

 

I share this sentiment, this was expected and based on what Lynam said when departing Staplewood, the reason for his visit etc..., a statement on here that he had spoken to as many office staff as available at St Marys in essence, I assume, to outline their position with the FA and buy more time with all employees.

Not suggesting it is right that staff(not players) may have been asked to wait a few days but don't believe this to be as groundbreaking as the Echo are making out or as some are interpreting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I share this sentiment, this was expected and based on what Lynam said when departing Staplewood, the reason for his visit etc..., a statement on here that he had spoken to as many office staff as available at St Marys in essence, I assume, to outline their position with the FA and buy more time with all employees.

Not suggesting it is right that staff(not players) may have been asked to wait a few days but don't believe this to be as groundbreaking as the Echo are making out or as some are interpreting it.

I got the impression that is not what was said to staff, and they are pretty worried today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4458429.Saints_staff_not_paid/

 

Needs to be sorted today really so we can get going.

 

Hardly a surprise is it?

 

The FL won't even have got back to Pinnacle yet to say they won't agree to Pinnacle's modifcations to the contract.

 

This is getting us nowhere. What possible contingency plan can Lynam have, other than to sign regardless?

 

K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is my impression, but by Fry saying he would sell players made it seeem that liquidation could be held back for a small amount of time

 

What's the legal position of players contracts if the Club defaults on salary payments? Can the contracts become void in this instance? In which case could they walk away to a new club without SFC receiving an payment? This really would be trouble leaving no assets for Fry to sell to pay off the creditors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...