PinkScarf Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Local paper gave Danny low marks for last game and said he was wasteful. Should Richardson be given a go ????????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deppo Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Yes, I think we should give Richardson a go at being wasteful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lets B Avenue Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Yes, I think we should give Richardson a go at being wasteful. We did. At Rochdale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sambosa75 Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Butterfield has more experience, I would stick with him. We need wise heads right now. Although we are blessed with a couple of decent right backs with good experience. As we are left backs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelkel31 Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 horses for courses, NA is doing the right thing in this area and picking the right player for the right match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
for_heaven's_Saint Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Whilst Richardson is quicker and perhaps more attack minded, he seems to have games where he struggles to find our players with any of his passes, for example Tranmere and Rochdale away, therefore I'd be inclined to stick with the unspectacular yet consistant Buttefield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Butterfield is our signing of the season IMO, Rovers is the only poor game I can remember him having. Yes he gets caught out now and then by pace but he's a 32 year old defender in the 3rd tier, what do you expect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Whilst Richardson is quicker and perhaps more attack minded' date=' he seems to have games where he struggles to find our players with any of his passes, for example Tranmere and Rochdale away, therefore I'd be inclined to stick with the unspectacular yet consistant Buttefield.[/quote'] 100% agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K,Billy's supersound Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 was at the game and yes he did give away possesion to much in the first half but i think you have to remember guly was suppose to play infront of him. again for the first 30mins of the first half he offered no width or ball down the line, he kept wanting to come more in midfeild untill nigel yet again yelled out him to stay wide and eventually swapped him over with fe for the last 15min. for me butterfeild would be my number 1 still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulwantsapint Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 The abuse that the full backs get all the time is because saints play with wingers who are given licence to roam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itchen_dan Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 I prefer Richardson. I dont go with all this "stick with Butterfield because he has more experience stuff". Richardson was in the League 1 team of the year last season. He helped Charlton get to the play offs. We paid about 400k for him. He is much better than Butterfield and offers us so much more IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wild-saint Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 I prefer Richardson. I dont go with all this "stick with Butterfield because he has more experience stuff". Richardson was in the League 1 team of the year last season. He helped Charlton get to the play offs. We paid about 400k for him. He is much better than Butterfield and offers us so much more IMO. this +1 pace and decent going forward. he is a proper fullback that looks to over lap unlike DB who is stable and never ventures over the halfway line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 this +1 pace and decent going forward. he is a proper fullback that looks to over lap unlike DB who is stable and never ventures over the halfway line. After viewing that 'proper fulback' Olivier Bernard in action I am more then happy with a RB that will not venture over the halfway line. Stability will do just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norwaysaint Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Richardson must be better because he cost us more money. Also he was in team of the year, so no matter what people see with their own eyes, he is officially better. It's like some of you have never played Football Manager at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithy Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 Butterfield should be our new striker now Barnard is out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colbury Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 this +1 pace and decent going forward. he is a proper fullback that looks to over lap unlike DB who is stable and never ventures over the halfway line. I must have imagined all the times DB has advanced into the opposition half and put in crosses of the highest quality then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFC Forever Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 I can remember several instances where Danny has ventured forward and put some great crosses into the opposition box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 19 April, 2011 Share Posted 19 April, 2011 both appear to be struggling with minor injuries so its who is fittest really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 20 April, 2011 Share Posted 20 April, 2011 Butterfield is our signing of the season IMO, Rovers is the only poor game I can remember him having. Yes he gets caught out now and then by pace but he's a 32 year old defender in the 3rd tier, what do you expect. Didn't go to Leyton Orient then ? FWIW I think Butterfield and Richardson have been below par the last couple of months, but Butterfield gives us more going forward as a far better crosser, and most of the problems he's had recently stem from our lack of a conventional right-sided midfielder supporting him. Richardson has managed not to impress me once this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stubby Posted 20 April, 2011 Share Posted 20 April, 2011 both appear to be struggling with minor injuries so its who is fittest really. Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wild-saint Posted 20 April, 2011 Share Posted 20 April, 2011 I can remember several instances where Danny has ventured forward and put some great crosses into the opposition box. Yeah he has put in some decent crosses but they are always from a deep position. I prefer a fullback that has the pace and ability to get further forward beyond their full back or at least at put a cross in from further up the field which means the opposition defence have a harder job of defending the ball in. DB maybe a better defender but we are in league 1 its not as if we are coming up against giggs and ronaldo each week. Anyhow if i was boss Richardson would be first choice and those are my reasons. right or wrong is not really the question is it? just a case of a preference of ore attack minded team. The same reasons above are why I like Dickson at fullback on the left over Harding (but to be fair to Harding its a much tighter call as he is much better going forward.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 20 April, 2011 Share Posted 20 April, 2011 Adkins has mixed the defence around more than I can remember. LB Dickson 12 Harding 33 CB Fonte 38 Jaidi 27 Seaborne 13 Martin 4 RB Butterfield 30 Richardson 11 But no-one has let in let less goals than us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revolution saint Posted 20 April, 2011 Share Posted 20 April, 2011 Tough start to the season for Richardson and maybe that's affected him but he hasn't impressed me in the way, say, Dickson has on the other side. There's not much between either RB but I'd be happier with Butterfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 20 April, 2011 Share Posted 20 April, 2011 Local paper gave Danny low marks for last game and said he was wasteful. Should Richardson be given a go ????????????????? we should play the one who is fit and have the best form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 20 April, 2011 Share Posted 20 April, 2011 Adkins has mixed the defence around more than I can remember. LB Dickson 12 Harding 33 CB Fonte 38 Jaidi 27 Seaborne 13 Martin 4 RB Butterfield 30 Richardson 11 But no-one has let in let less goals than us. To be fair.. there has been a long list of injuries throughout the season,(and occasional lapses of form,) but in most cases NA had little choice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 20 April, 2011 Share Posted 20 April, 2011 The abuse that the full backs get all the time is because saints play with wingers who are given licence to roam .......and in consequence don't give cover to their full back, as they should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now