Donald Trump Appreciation Thread

[skintsaint]

Some brag...

[sadoldgit]

20 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

Some brag...

Did he say why, or wasn’t that important? I suppose they should be thankful that they didn’t just blow it out of the water.

[whelk]

22 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

Some brag...

That’s what he says about his tiny shrivelled mushroom cock and his pissy little baby hands

[badgerx16]

Boasting about the size of something you have stolen. Is the US Navy now playing games with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, "Anything you can seize, we can seize bigger. We can seize snything bigger than you.".

Edited Thursday at 15:05 by badgerx16

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, sadoldgit said:

Did he say why, or wasn’t that important? I suppose they should be thankful that they didn’t just blow it out of the water.

They want it's cargo.

[sadoldgit]

Poor response to Donald in Parliament.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/dec/11/asked-about-the-donalds-national-security-strategy-the-commons-was-remarkable-for-its-absences

 

[Picard]

On 10/12/2025 at 23:06, badgerx16 said:

Now we know why the US Navy has deployed so much hardware to the sea off Venezuela, they are acting as modern day pirates.

 

The tanker was violating sanctions.

[sadoldgit]

Font changed for being woke.🙄

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgkez3367xmo.amp

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, Picard said:

The tanker was violating sanctions.

I know.

[sadoldgit]

4 hours ago, Picard said:

The tanker was violating sanctions.

Sanctions or no sanctions, under International law what the US did = piracy.

[sadoldgit]

Donald in trouble with the law again.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-is-sued-over-white-house-ballroom-construction-3e9098a0?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqfH-gLp0s9XVuG3oloSMWg_KCl5IwFRBRJweTn6I08cR2x6qZ4fk9OXT-Qp7ZY%3D&gaa_ts=693c7f7c&gaa_sig=biQJ5IYCu0n0FdksN2wVpJkwTah6lbJxBxQKxZYAxzW7fuDADCGQg678a5s7cMs0yZ8dvBPDD-gNv12cbsVM6w%3D%3D

[Farmer Saint]

 

Very interesting from Sky News again, they're really good at this sort of analysis.

 

[sadoldgit]

For those who have a problem with the far right label maybe best avoid this article. It comes from the stable of the same people who own the Daily Mail though.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/trump-wants-revolution-in-europe-the-far-right-will-help-him-get-it/ar-AA1Skmxt?cvid=3f69c721694f4dd5b4da9fe88fe6c20e&ocid=hpmsn

[badgerx16]

Donnie shows his class in commenting on the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife;

"The president said that Reiner, a 'once very talented movie director and comedy star,' had passed away 'reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease' known as TDS - or Trump Derangement Syndrome."

[sadoldgit]

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Donnie shows his class in commenting on the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife;

"The president said that Reiner, a 'once very talented movie director and comedy star,' had passed away 'reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease' known as TDS - or Trump Derangement Syndrome."

It’s always about Trump. As ever, no empathy, no class, no self awareness. Barely a day passes when he doesn’t sink to a new low.

[Gloucester Saint]

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Donnie shows his class in commenting on the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife;

"The president said that Reiner, a 'once very talented movie director and comedy star,' had passed away 'reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease' known as TDS - or Trump Derangement Syndrome."

All the charm, grace and diplomacy of an encrusted jizz stain on a headboard. Great advert for the USA.

[31cc]

Edited 20 hours ago by 31cc

[hypochondriac]

1 minute ago, 31cc said:

Yeah that's just a cuntish thing to say really isn't it. 

[Gloucester Saint]

2 minutes ago, 31cc said:

Debate his policies, his impact, the MAGA movement and the motives of the 77m who voted for him.

But just on this type of behaviour alone, he should not be anywhere near such an important leadership position, 

[sadoldgit]

3 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Debate his policies, his impact, the MAGA movement and the motives of the 77m who voted for him.

But just on this type of behaviour alone, he should not be anywhere near such an important leadership position, 

If a CEO of a company had written this they would have been escorted out of the building by security. It’s beyond bizarre that such an appalling human being who demonstrates his unsuitability for such a job daily remains in post.

[benjii]

16 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Debate his policies, his impact, the MAGA movement and the motives of the 77m who voted for him.

But just on this type of behaviour alone, he should not be anywhere near such an important leadership position, 

Indeed, and not just for the sentiment but because he writes like a 12 year old.

Edited 20 hours ago by benjii
Felt "14" was maybe a bit unfair on 14 year olds, so changed it to "12".

[pingpong]

41 minutes ago, benjii said:

Indeed, and not just for the sentiment but because he writes like a 12 year old.

Still too high. By 12 you are in secondary school and would have surpassed trumps reading age already.

My 7 yr old nephew might say something like he did when he is having an episode, so I'd say he writes like a 7yr old having a tantrum.

Correction: I've looked it up. Trumps reading age is 9-10yrs old, so maybe the answer is between the two of us.

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/s/WjZJ9NGFZq

Edited 19 hours ago by pingpong
Reading age added.

[rallyboy]

Trump should lose this BBC lawsuit, he is claiming that the BBC showed malice, which is impossible to prove without some very dodgy internal communications.

His ego might have just walked him into an expensive mistake.

[sadoldgit]

1 minute ago, rallyboy said:

Trump should lose this BBC lawsuit, he is claiming that the BBC showed malice, which is impossible to prove without some very dodgy internal communications.

His ego might have just walked him into an expensive mistake.

He also has to prove that it was transmitted by the BBC in Florida which will prove problematic.

[badgerx16]

He also has to prove he suffered financial loss.

[sadoldgit]

12 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

He also has to prove he suffered financial loss.

And find evidence that people changed their voting intention based on what they saw. Given that he won the election he is on very thin ice there too.

It would be great if they invoked the 25th Amendment but then we would end up with Vance as POTUS. Not sure if that would be a huge improvement.

Edited 2 hours ago by sadoldgit
Added text

[Stripey McStripe Shirt]

3 hours ago, rallyboy said:

Trump should lose this BBC lawsuit, he is claiming that the BBC showed malice, which is impossible to prove without some very dodgy internal communications.

His ego might have just walked him into an expensive mistake.

I see he's claiming that the BBC stuff is completely fake, and that he never uttered those words and that it's probably AI. Obviously the BBC edited things in a stupid way, but it's clearly not AI. The worrying thing is though, that I suspect this is a sign of things to come from now on... do anything you want and if it goes badly claim it's AI/fake. Yes, basically the same as what he's always done, but potentially more dangerous now than ever before.

 

[badgerx16]

1 minute ago, Stripey McStripe Shirt said:

I see he's claiming that the BBC stuff is completely fake, and that he never uttered those words and that it's probably AI. Obviously the BBC edited things in a stupid way, but it's clearly not AI. The worrying thing is though, that I suspect this is a sign of things to come from now on... do anything you want and if it goes badly claim it's AI/fake. Yes, basically the same as what he's always done, but potentially more dangerous now than ever before.

 

So is he claiming the entire live TV broadcast of his speech, the tape of which the BBC edited, was a fabrication ?