AlexLaw76 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Its just how I feel. All I'm saying is that it encompasses so much more than tv. People associate the fee too much with the tv element. There are not many ‘things’ (if any) done, created or produced at, or commissioned by, the BBC that is unique.
JohnnyShearer2.0 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: There are not many ‘things’ (if any) done, created or produced at, or commissioned by, the BBC that is unique. Fair enough if thats how you feel and your opinion.
badgerx16 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 58 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Its just how I feel. All I'm saying is that it encompasses so much more than tv. People associate the fee too much with the tv element. Maybe because it is called the TV Licence.
JohnnyShearer2.0 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 27 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Maybe because it is called the TV Licence. Ha, good point! 😁 2 1
Turkish Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago 1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said: There are not many ‘things’ (if any) done, created or produced at, or commissioned by, the BBC that is unique. Peaky Blinders is one of them 1
Lord Duckhunter Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago 10 hours ago, sadoldgit said: When I was a kid and there was only two then three channels they always used to put on great Christmas specials and keep the big films back for Christmas week. Pre video recorders there was always a big debate about what to watch. They don’t seem to bother too much now. Stuck in the past again. Get into the modern world man..
Lord Duckhunter Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago 3 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: it would survive by dropping the very services people undervalue today—children’s education, local radio, cultural programming, and niche content If enough people want to watch it, they’ll pay for it, Why should the rest of us pony up for a load of old pony we don’t want to watch.
benjii Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said: If enough people want to watch it, they’ll pay for it, Why should the rest of us pony up for a load of old pony we don’t want to watch. So that we have a public service broadcaster.
Lord Duckhunter Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, benjii said: So that we have a public service broadcaster. Ahh bless
The Kraken Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, benjii said: So that we have a public service broadcaster. Why is that so important, out of interest? In this day and age I’m not sure I see the necessity but I admit I’m willing to be convinced otherwise. Other than “we’ve always had one”.
benjii Posted 26 minutes ago Posted 26 minutes ago I just answered his question. I don't have a strong view, other than the BBC seems miles better than most media organisations in the various places I have lived and worked 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 20 minutes ago Posted 20 minutes ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, benjii said: I just answered his question. I don't have a strong view, other than the BBC seems miles better than most media organisations in the various places I have lived and worked it's alright. Most of its content isn't particularly great, or ground breaking in any way. Edited 20 minutes ago by AlexLaw76
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now