Rupert Lowe

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said:

 

Rupert forgot to turn his webcam off whilst tuping that.........

[benjii]

On 09/06/2026 at 11:25, Osvaldorama said:

 

Legend. 
 

Meanwhile a man being beheaded in the street in Belfast doesn’t even make it into the BBC News website…. 
 

 

Haha, what a daft cunt.

Let's make Britain a tinpot dictatorship.... great idea.

[JohnnyShearer2.0]

4 hours ago, benjii said:

Haha, what a daft cunt.

Let's make Britain a tinpot dictatorship.... great idea.

Arent prisons at capacity? If so, he could have a plan to kick start the economy. 

Build more prisons and then more jobs.

[Jeremy Corbyn]

18 hours ago, benjii said:

Haha, what a daft cunt.

Let's make Britain a tinpot dictatorship.... great idea.

Absolutely batshit - suggesting you would imprison people for political decisions in a democracy.

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, Jeremy Corbyn said:

Absolutely batshit - suggesting you would imprison people for political decisions in a democracy.

[badgerx16]

If voting were compulsory and it was a straight choice between Lowe and Farage, I'd refuse to vote.

[Osvaldorama]

[Willo of Whiteley]

He really is an absolute fanny, isn’t he.

All people like him do to stay relevant is to try and fan the flames.

Absolute scum of the earth him, Farage, etc. The world would be a much better place without those lowlifes flinging their shit around.

[badgerx16]

3 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:

Bloody Council wasting money on children in care instead of sorting out the really important stuff.

 

[Holmes_and_Watson]

10 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Bloody Council wasting money on children in care instead of sorting out the really important stuff.

 

By getting children in care to occupy their time cleaning graffiti, it's a win-win.

Looking forward to getting your vote. 🙂

[whelk]

Staring at walls is the new pastime for the kids not allowed on social media, so important they are clean and not influenced by subliminal graffiti.

[badgerx16]

4 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

By getting children in care to occupy their time cleaning graffiti, it's a win-win.

Looking forward to getting your vote. 🙂

As I stated earlier, I wouldn't vote for Lowe if voting was compulsory and he was the only candidate. He is a complete cunt of the highest order.

 

[ecuk268]

31 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

As I stated earlier, I wouldn't vote for Lowe if voting was compulsory and he was the only candidate. He is a complete cunt of the highest order.

 

Don't sit on the fence.

Tell us what you really think.

[Secret Site Agent]

On 04/06/2026 at 07:58, Weston Super Saint said:

Swing him from the Itchen bridge.

"Swing Low

Old Rupert Lowe

Coming for to send immigrants home.

Swing Lowe

Old Rupert Lowe

Saviour of the Nazi Genome."

 

[sadoldgit]

[spyinthesky]

3 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

Blimey, Hockey playing Rups has changed since he was Chairman of the mighty Saints!!

[Turkish]

4 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

@iansums how many times have you been told about this sort of stuff?

[ecuk268]

4 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

Obviously attracting the intellectual elite of Makerfield.

[Gloucester Saint]

4 hours ago, Turkish said:

@iansums how many times have you been told about this sort of stuff?

Good job he’s not allowed to vote. The good news is that after consultation with our elections officer in Romney Marsh, Mrs Sums is allowed to vote.

Every cloud etc.

[Osvaldorama]

The Rape Gang Inquiry Report

 

People can hate on him all they like, but organising and funding this is a genuinely heroic thing to do, and the coverup of this is absolutely disgusting. 
 

The mainstream media still haven’t covered this anywhere near enough, for some reason. 

[Farmer Saint]

29 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

The Rape Gang Inquiry Report

 

People can hate on him all they like, but organising and funding this is a genuinely heroic thing to do, and the coverup of this is absolutely disgusting. 
 

The mainstream media still haven’t covered this anywhere near enough, for some reason. 

But if it was the choice of this or Digital IDs we know which one you'd choose...

[Osvaldorama]

59 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

But if it was the choice of this or Digital IDs we know which one you'd choose...

Another low IQ comment. Clearly the two have absolutely nothing to do with each other. 

What does a systemic cover up of the rape of thousands of young girls by the national crime agency, police and other institutions have to do with a draconian new proposal?

Edited 19 hours ago by Osvaldorama

[Osvaldorama]

Still going on now btw

 

Rotherham survivor in her own words

[Farmer Saint]

7 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:

Another low IQ comment. Clearly the two have absolutely nothing to do with each other. 

What does a systemic cover up of the rape of thousands of young girls by the national crime agency, police and other institutions have to do with a draconian new proposal?

I think you have questions of mine to answer first, don't you? So I'll ask the questions again, for about the 10th time:

1. If you don't agree with a social media ban for kids, because you are scared of Digital IDs, what other methods would you use to safeguard children who use these platforms, and would you prefer to safeguard children, or have Digital IDs?

2. You made the comment that thousands of people in the UK have been arrested for criticising Keir Starmer's government without committing any crimes. Please give us an example of one of these.

Also, not sure there is anything that demonstrates a low IQ better than perpetuating a belief in conspiracy theories:

https://www.adamstaten.com/blog/2021/2/7/low-iq-and-conspiracy-theories-a-hand-in-glove-relationship

Edited 12 hours ago by Farmer Saint

[Osvaldorama]

2 hours ago, Farmer Saint said:

I think you have questions of mine to answer first, don't you? So I'll ask the questions again, for about the 10th time:

1. If you don't agree with a social media ban for kids, because you are scared of Digital IDs, what other methods would you use to safeguard children who use these platforms, and would you prefer to safeguard children, or have Digital IDs?

2. You made the comment that thousands of people in the UK have been arrested for criticising Keir Starmer's government without committing any crimes. Please give us an example of one of these.

Also, not sure there is anything that demonstrates a low IQ better than perpetuating a belief in conspiracy theories:

https://www.adamstaten.com/blog/2021/2/7/low-iq-and-conspiracy-theories-a-hand-in-glove-relationship

Why are you bringing issues from another thread into this one and ignoring the rape gang report? 
Do you support the abuse of young girls?

[rallyboy]

While frothing at the mouth about every Pakistani sex offender and demanding that they are put to death, Rupert has no opinion at all on the two white men who murdered a baby through a violent sexual assault.

Ditto Farage, Robinson and Fox, very quick to demand street rage for any crime committed by people who look different, but eerily silent on any crimes that don't suit them.

Both Reform and Restore's agendas and the aims of their financial backers are very clear.

[Gloucester Saint]

14 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

Why are you bringing issues from another thread into this one and ignoring the rape gang report? 
Do you support the abuse of young girls?

Whilst the police didn’t do enough to investigate the cases of men of Pakistani heritage raping and abusing girls in the 2000s, a police task force report in 2024 found that 27% of investigations into child abuse involved family members, 22% other children and 19% criminal networks of offenders (Sidney Cooke type rings).

The National Police Chiefs Council’s data (which has some variables but not on this scale) shows that circa 85% of group-based child abuse is perpetrated by white offenders alone. 

Funnily enough, the facts don’t sit with Musk’s misinformation.

Furthermore, Nazir Afzal, a public prosecutor from Pakistan heritage himself, has said several times that Kier Starmer was instrumental in giving him the time, space and political clearance to finally investigate and prosecute where his predecessors and the police hadn’t.

Starmer might be a wally and I’d never vote for him and Labour but this far right line of attack has no facts to back it up. 

Game. Set. Match. Don’t bother to reply.

Edited 10 hours ago by Gloucester Saint

[Farmer Saint]

25 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

Why are you bringing issues from another thread into this one and ignoring the rape gang report? 
Do you support the abuse of young girls?

Absolutely not.

Because you ran away from the other thread, so thought it best for you to answer on this one.

[Osvaldorama]

56 minutes ago, rallyboy said:

While frothing at the mouth about every Pakistani sex offender and demanding that they are put to death, Rupert has no opinion at all on the two white men who murdered a baby through a violent sexual assault.

Ditto Farage, Robinson and Fox, very quick to demand street rage for any crime committed by people who look different, but eerily silent on any crimes that don't suit them.

Both Reform and Restore's agendas and the aims of their financial backers are very clear.

‘Whataboutism’ and also simply not true. Restore especially have said that they will be tough on all criminals, nothing to do with race. 
 

 

[Osvaldorama]

55 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Whilst the police didn’t do enough to investigate the cases of men of Pakistani heritage raping and abusing girls in the 2000s, a police task force report in 2024 found that 27% of investigations into child abuse involved family members, 22% other children and 19% criminal networks of offenders (Sidney Cooke type rings).

The National Police Chiefs Council’s data (which has some variables but not on this scale) shows that circa 85% of group-based child abuse is perpetrated by white offenders alone. 

Funnily enough, the facts don’t sit with Musk’s misinformation.

Furthermore, Nazir Afzal, a public prosecutor from Pakistan heritage himself, has said several times that Kier Starmer was instrumental in giving him the time, space and political clearance to finally investigate and prosecute where his predecessors and the police hadn’t.

Starmer might be a wally and I’d never vote for him and Labour but this far right line of attack has no facts to back it up. 

Game. Set. Match. Don’t bother to reply.

So you’re just going to ignore the independent report and the accounts of the victims? 
 

nice. 

[badgerx16]

6 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

So you’re just going to ignore the independent report and the accounts of the victims? 
 

nice. 

He didn't say that, he put things in perspective. Of course nobody in their right mind would condone what happened to those victims, and there may possibly have been attempts by the authorities to tone down references to the race of some groups of perpetrators, but the scale and scope of this is wider than might be perceived by focussing on one ethno-religious group for political advantage.

[Osvaldorama]

33 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

He didn't say that, he put things in perspective. Of course nobody in their right mind would condone what happened to those victims, and there may possibly have been attempts by the authorities to tone down references to the race of some groups of perpetrators, but the scale and scope of this is wider than might be perceived by focussing on one ethno-religious group for political advantage.

The police told the mother of one of the victims when she reported it that “she should be grateful for experiencing other cultures”

 

[Osvaldorama]

[Gloucester Saint]

28 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

The police told the mother of one of the victims when she reported it that “she should be grateful for experiencing other cultures”

 

Crap policing. They aren’t any better with white on white victims though, loads of harrowing accounts of mis-handling of cases. The whole two-tier construct is garbage. 

Edited 8 hours ago by Gloucester Saint

[Gloucester Saint]

14 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

Again, it’s lack of context and objective evidence. We can all cherry pick and cut and paste quotes. DPP wasn’t getting proper cases from the police forces which they should have had. They have to make decisions on the strength of the case presenting and likelihood of prosecution should a case go to court. Court cases in these situations, rare as they are, are bloody expensive and doubly so if there’s say a 50% chance of acquitting, that’s a hell of a risk to take not to mention the social and cultural costs.

This is from family who have been senior figures in the judicial system, not X.

The figure for Starmer is meaningless without the context of what was presented to the DPP. Nazir’s account of finally being enabled to address the issue and force the hand of the police is more realistic.

Khan I’m less comfortable about, I think it was quite complacent to assume it was a northern issue when you think about the size and complexity of London. But again, context. One random cut out from an entire report doesn’t make him an enabler. 

[Gloucester Saint]

PS - put on ignore. Anyone who thinks the man who took Southampton FC from the PL to L1 on -10, nearly losing the club, is the answer to the country’s ills is quite unwell mentally. I’m wasting time providing facts and context when it is cut and paste coming back with zero context. 

[egg]

35 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

The police told the mother of one of the victims when she reported it that “she should be grateful for experiencing other cultures”

 

Are those findings or claims? Regardless, as commendable as it is that Lowe pushed hard for the investigation, anyone seeking to lay the blame for these hideous gangs at the door of Starmer or Khan is beyond pathetic. Additionally, you've got to question why anyone would believe that Rupert Lowe is the saviour of the UK and the working man. 

[whelk]

47 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

Historian? No gullible fucking idiot scared of the world

[Osvaldorama]

1 hour ago, egg said:

Are those findings or claims? Regardless, as commendable as it is that Lowe pushed hard for the investigation, anyone seeking to lay the blame for these hideous gangs at the door of Starmer or Khan is beyond pathetic. Additionally, you've got to question why anyone would believe that Rupert Lowe is the saviour of the UK and the working man. 

The report states that both Starmer knew what was happening and covered it up/minimised the seriousness of it. 
 

Not really sure you have a leg to stand on here 

[egg]

13 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

The report states that both Starmer knew what was happening and covered it up/minimised the seriousness of it. 
 

Not really sure you have a leg to stand on here 

That doesn't address the question, which I asked as I genuinely wanted to know if the comment you highlighted was a finding from any enquiry, or a claim. What's the answer, please? 

Re Starmer, where does the report say that he "minimised it" or "covered it up"? That's a serious allegation, and you'll have to link me to the findings in the report which supports your claim. It doesn't say that though, but this is your claim, so support it please. 

[Osvaldorama]

It’s linked up above, go and read it. 
 

 

[whelk]

Is Michelle Obama a man?

[egg]

9 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

It’s linked up above, go and read it. 
 

 

This is tiresome, and that's not a link. 

Please just say whether the part you highlighted and I commented on is a claim or a finding. It's a really simple question, which you can answer "claim" or "finding". If that's it's the latter, please provide an actual link - you could have screen shot anything. 

Re Starmer, the report doesn't say that he covered up or minimised the rape gang stuff. If you say otherwise, post up an actual link to the evidence of your claim. 

[egg]

7 minutes ago, whelk said:

Is Michelle Obama a man?

A pro arm wrestler called Dirk from Michigan I've heard. It was on X so it's definitely true. 

[Osvaldorama]

17 minutes ago, whelk said:

Is Michelle Obama a man?

Not anymore 👀 

[egg]

2 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

PS - put on ignore. Anyone who thinks the man who took Southampton FC from the PL to L1 on -10, nearly losing the club, is the answer to the country’s ills is quite unwell mentally. I’m wasting time providing facts and context when it is cut and paste coming back with zero context. 

Ditto. Nowt worse than a poster who won't answer simple questions about their own posts, or link to their claims. He's either a troll or conspiracist who's lost down a rabbit hole. I suspect the latter.